I was asked to write the product of this hypothetical reaction, but my teacher said that the encircled one is the major one. Why would that be? Both structures have the same number of hyperconjugation structures. Moreover, the carbocation is more stabilised in the non encircled one, shouldn't that be the major one?
NS Sir se revise kar rhi thi par yaha CHX2 kaise add hua is minor wale me ye samajh me ni aya. 😞
I wanted to revise this topic but I couldn't find it in the playlist. Can somebody help me out here?
Ever since I was 7 years old I have been bullied and made fun of at school. I look ugly, am quite nerdy and awkward, so I was the perfect target. I've also had a porn addiction since then, and Ive had a shit family situation along with always comparing myself to people. I never have had many friends, and I have always keep these things bottled up. I always tried to also never spend anything extra or anything, so my childhood has always been just navigating alone through this mess I've had.
But then since I was like from 4th-5th grade, things started happening. I usually remained calm, but I developed another "side" of myself, where I was very cold and less empathetic. I was really beaten up and made fun of during that time, so that led to this disaster. And the thing is, I still have this side of myself to this day. My problems haven't fully resolved but I have come a long way, yet I now remain a double faced person. (I developed new problems such as having to plan out my future as my family is in major debt,k.
Now, occassionally, even though a part of me knows it's really fucked up shit, I think of klling people (who have wrong me, who beated me up and all) I've never acted upon it. I know it's really fcked up shit, I know it's wrong, but a part of my mind I think has I talk to myself all the time out loud and when I get angry/under stress, I revert to that side. And all that. I become very quiet, am rude and just act crazy when I'm alone. I even hurt my family and my best friend emotionally quite a lot when I'm like this. One part of me knows it's wrong but once I'm "triggered" I just think of / do all this.
I can't really go to therapy (Can't reveal all this to family, can't really trust to tell my only remaining friend this, and Ive got 12th boards, big dreams in IITs, gotta pay my debt and laons and all) so the only way to relieve it, except diary entries, is maybe confessing here.
IDK the extent of the shit person I've become, but I don't know what to do. Or even if I can become a better, normal person. I just wanna be normal again. IDK If I could ever be.
It just feels counterintuitive. I know the derivation, I know it is σ/2ε but it just feels wrong. Shouldn't it due to symmetry cancel out?
I think we'll have to further maybe use the fact that there are a total of 2026C2 choices over here to choose from but how would we do that exactly?
Here, I was given this molecule and asked to count how many resonance structures are there. The answer was 3 including the structure itself. But I obtained 4 of them. What should be the answer?
Here I think the second structure (E) is the more stable once since in (D) there is an sp2 hybridised carbon with a +ve charge, which is very unstable. However, the book lists the answer as D being the stabler resonance structure, due to "charge seperation being more". So I am confused as to which one should be the priority? I think it should be E but I am a bit puzzled right now.
Like yes I can directly see that if I attach a vinylic group there would be conjugations but I just wanted confirmation regarding the fact that is this the reason it's electron withdrawing right? Since the vinylic group would now bear +ve charge and Nitrogen bears -ve charge in the resonance structure, right?
Here, why don't we get cyclohex-1,3-diene which would have conjugation?
On the surface, it should be a -I group. The carbon should have sufficient partial positive due to the 2 oxygens pulling the electrons away from it. So, it should desire electrons, making it a withdrawing group. Why is it a density releasing one then? (I saw +I for COO- in my textbook)
PS : Why is it that NR3+ also is more withdrawing than NH3+? Shouldn't the Alkyls also give the electron density to N?
On the surface, it should be a -I group. The carbon should have sufficient partial positive due to the 2 oxygens pulling the electrons away from it. So, it should desire electrons, making it a withdrawying group. Why is it a density releasing one then?
I was doing some questions and in there we had to count chiral as well as pseudo chiral centres. But what does the latter term mean?
I have this compound which I have to react with Selenium and heat. The reaction product is Benzene via Dehydrogenating. However, I don't understand how this would react. Maybe it dehydrogenates one of the positions and there is an adjacent double bond formation but that's not conjugated. Aage kaise proceed karungi fir idhar?
I have this compound which I have to react with Selenium and heat. The reaction product is Benzene via Dehydrogenating. However, I don't understand how this would react. Maybe it dehydrogenates one of the positions and there is an adjacent double bond formation but that's not conjugated. How should I proceed?
I mean there is one lone pair and 6 fluorine atoms, which should mean that we get a Pentagonal Bipyramidal structure. But it's distorted octahedron with a fluxional lone pair. Why is this the case?
A launch travels across a river from A to B on the opposite bank along the line AB forming an angle α. The flag on the mast of the launch makes an angle β with the direction of the motion. What's the speed of the launch wrt the bank? Given that u is the velocity of the wind blowing perpendicularly to the current.
I don't idhar usin(α+β-π/2)sin(β) kaise hai. Mere hisaab se sirf usin(β+α-π/2) hoga kyunki that's the one providing the wind. Any idea kaise karna h ye?
