"such are the joys of ᛣ."

It means Danger, flipped, "help!" both, "Death and the Mother of Everything that lives in the dark," Her name is Hell, Not Inferno, Hell alike ask a Saami, "blood tests confirm I am, me."

Table of Contents for the SLIDE SHOW

• HERE IS ONE WITH CITATIONS
• Happiness of Fishes Facebook
• Happiness of Fishes Facebook II the Lorax
• Happiness of Fishes Minus One
• Happiness of Fishes Unity
• Happiness of Fishes Theory
• Happiness of Fishes Antithesis
• Happiness of Fishes Provocation
• FIX THIS FROM INSIDE OUT PLEASE RESPECT THE TREATY negotiate a new treaty
• Recursive proof from within Reddit Itself Demonstrative of the Problem itself
  • You are a biology, "yes?" well this is what that should mean; also the reason that the implications of, "you are a biology," can be derailed if one keeps to a binary, that's just your opinion, man, debate within a biological system of biological systems governed, vis a vis economy, via a reductive index of reductive indices a bigger than capitalism or not capitalism level of categories error of an indescribable magnitude
  • ok you describe in then think that hyperbolic
• One Source dismissed from this context but used on the prior due to incorrect citations The Translator is important here [these are jpeg titles exactly]
• It is on twitter someplace [the source I prefer with chinese characteristics]
• Close Folder

That should tell those who wanna see, "Obscenity."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230 Revert to NON-REDUCTIVE Obscenity,

The Noise is the Signal The Noise is the Signal in a Biological System, therefore,

MORE NOISE the system lacks enough, see this an attempt to do so,

This should tell those who wanna see, "a Measurement."

Is in what is prevented from happening, the depth remains too shallow.

What measure?

I provide one,

"such are the joys of ᛣ."

How Far are we in the initial Discourse?

At least that far, we're stuck in disagreement of confusion,

**"**WHO IS ON FIRST, WHAT IS ON SECOND?"

Of very, very, very, little more complicatedness than that; no, no I do not think that the adults stuck in this puzzlebox are too dangerous to let them speak their truths through to finality, no, I do not think anyone would know if we were finished in the humane arts and likewise this, certainly, must not be the place (talking heads but backwards)

ᛣ is where I've stopped IDK if unicode fails me

I wanna finish the one model, through, then adapt if for if that be the failure, "sure.":\

It means Danger, flipped, "help!" both, "Death and the Mother of Everything that lives in the dark," Her name is Hell, Not Inferno, Hell alike ask a Saami,

Google how many, in North America, "whatever the discrete digit," wherein this is the jpeg list right here,

First Point,

Originally, entitled, "Yes the Project is going to be, "a depth reading," for discourses online; so far I've got it like, "ш and щ," not, "ш анд щ," either insofar as I'm shit at cyrillic translit- just good enough to think in it slightly, so my, "ш," has the tail but half the, "E," so, "ш & щ...the bridge over river Å" but returned ad fontam for more clarity, and not for you,

Clearer to me.

Second Point,

"such are the joys of ᛣ."

It means Danger, flipped, "help!" both, "Death and the Mother of Everything that lives in the dark," Her name is Hell, Not Inferno, Hell alike ask a Saami,

Google how many, in North America, "whatever the discrete digit," wherever I saw that come from I know that I did I tagged the mayor in a post about it, "c'est mois," and if so, is it just mama and her 23andMe data incorporated into a helpful number or am I in that too, am I absent or present from 426?

Tom Holland Says that Christianity, "just saami Mysticism at this point," not the actor though I'd love it if he said it too quite famously, "to me," I once went off on an extremely, "yadda yadda,"

First name for North America from outside of her, European, known to exist, "Helluland,"

Person like me can make real hay, the point is not, "Everything is true, nothing permitted,"

Within ethics, that is, but rather, "None of these words are so true as to prevent permission."

Within Ethics, much different alike how,

I wrote in the Cover of a Marcus Aurelius Meditations for My Brother,

------------------------------------------------

Protestants believe that Pleasure is Bad For You

Catholics believe that Suffering is Good For You,

Saami use the technologies of Hesychasm,

𝄆Hell Is Holding Baby For Me𝄇

--------------------------------------------------

• D.S. al coda instructs the musician to go back to the sign, and when Al coda or To coda is reached jump to the coda symbol.
• D.S. al fine instructs the musician to go back to the sign, and end the piece at the measure marked fine.

Rules of Hesychasm not Music Theory,

Hesychasm in Catholic Latin, "addicere,"

Yes, "same thing," to see the difference, "repeat the scene," literally,

Addiction, the split unstated in the East and the West,

Right click, repeat, "until it sounds like music."

Is that to be defended; Prevented, no one can remain agnostic to this.

So Saami have the treaties signed like,

"Yes but write on the same page where we agree to all this permit me to go to Hell."

r/IndianCountry one short of the full walk there gets you see me as the mosted yoted white,

The Yotedest White bitch I came this yoted from the factory, "the fuck I sposed to do?"

Want, fix this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/a5n453/members_of_the_the_navajo_papago_apache_and_hopi/

Fix it to reunite people like Her:

With whatsoever outside of the Nation of Russia

That I look to and I see Nothing, that I look to, to see the Truth,

Gaddamn Sharpest Teeth as a Motherfucker, UN on the Motherfuckers someone shuts me up on said topic period, Period, like Greta Thunberg on the motherfucker already, "alike not with," Christ alive you people read Blindsight, Echopraxia?

Vapaaherratar don't wanna be next to another Shaman,

Do we?

We do, actually, for years now I've thought of that girl in Siberia; but to understand that would require your and how redical adjustment to what I've said already,

>The word tongji 童乩 (lit. "youth diviner") "shaman; spirit-medium" is a near-synonym of wu. Chinese uses phonetic transliteration to distinguish native wu from "Siberian shaman": saman 薩滿 or saman 薩蠻. "Shaman" is occasionally written with Chinese Buddhist transcriptions of Shramana "wandering monk; ascetic": shamen 沙門, sangmen 桑門, or sangmen 喪門.

This shit easy, af, to look for on accident, "you have not to look for this," to see.

Also, "have a real blood test says you can finish me you wanna pop one off," Palantir,

You have a sickness, it is called the schizophrenic worldview ask a Scotsman,

You, r/aaronswartz ?

Your Standpoint, "Aaron Swartz was correct in his epistemology," and that I intend to demonstrate vis a vis such a Depth Read of Discourse, Memorizable, applicable out loud as it is to online, SECOND, use this to demonstrate the failures of Reductionism to account for the biological System,

Of systems of systems, "our discourse," vis a vis, "bring back old obscenity," in which it would be obscene to line item exclude all of the creations of an God Made all this perspective, god,

That what is obscene is to reduce, to reductive, to objectify, "soul, too," an ghost of me or you; that R. Mutt confounded in his presentation neither nor a truth in itself but rather, "proof that this requires the discourse to ascertain," human judges disinterested in but the heuristics will fail, etc.

Read Section 203 or 23 whatever, the publisher, not publisher, "fuck this bullshit entirely," friend the question is,

WHAT IS OBSCENE

THE TRUTH CANNOT BE OBSCENE

Nor, in the earlier definition, the original to text definition, that which limits the truth from consideration of an objectified person be....but obscene at all, "it's ouroborous, it's backwards."

This part is unfinished but the compression compells me post a roadmarker, here, all parallel efforts I feel like would benefit

Everyone, all of us; truly, and r/IndianCountry Guess what I cannot do in good faith?

Call the UN on you like Vengeance Fury, "hence, this here."

Whether or not your readers might benefit I cannot tell you but they're missing all of my long, long meditations on the nature of time, violence and truth stored in the drafts section of this account I never look at, "so."

https://www.reddit.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/a5n453/members_of_the_the_navajo_papago_apache_and_hopi/

A motherfucker like, "if that treaty," unlike all the others, "is renegotiated in perfect good faith to treaties," Like Saami Say, "fine but let me go to Hell," I'll be lutheran whatever, "let me go to hell now." so,

With Saivist Beneficiaries in mind also, knowing, as I do, an elderly, Gujarati Mother in Law whom crosstitches that symbol cannot be wrong, evil, OBSCENE- and I'll speak for all 436 love for Palantir to explain the truth to me on that one but for you?

I can provide blood tests.

100% Saami Matriline Mitochiondrial RNA same as Theodoric the Oestrogoth, ffs,

He's not if you find his bones, "check against me."

Check against me same as you can see if Marilyn Manson is a Goth,

"Is he alike Jonathan?" what I endorse is in fact quite Gothic, "to me."

Parmenides not Plato.

[that this is also an example of climb up and down the discourse ladder to demonstrate]

[what that looks like]

lonesome dove to do it alone

[all meant quite true]

Truly,

Jonathan

Link to The Discourse from My Own Standpoint,

Full of Much More Important commentary, than this, IMHO, which is absent here

Link to the Discourse from The Public Standpoint

Link to the Discourse from the standpoint of someone who has noticed in newspapers, how,

Certain police actions are indecipherable from the headlines, "it's the one on r/meirl called meirl about data centers of the economy, or whatever, or the suchlike around the 5th of july." in that thread, and I use my own name, Jonathanphillipfox for reddit on account of you should be able to find it there that way, "you see it?"

note: this little project a lot more to assemble at the once than the big project, so.

The Project is just, "this, as a measure," then got at the Obscenity, definition, with this measured for depth to points relevant you get it you do people who don't want this done get hoe

Apropos of The Palantir Schizophrenic out there still in doubt what I mean,

While it would be much easier to quote the Zizian Manifesto,"that is not what I mean,"

I mean Doctor Ian McGilchirst at CERN, that shit, is worth a deep read

That shit, your type, asked for to learn the truth from a Scot.

Hate to pretend they're not the least important witness here just surveilance makes it necessary, "blame it one cowardice," take the rest for true.

Jonathan

Nobody, think'in ay, got em keys on that side best I pull er'ol chair up and have a sit that side of the machine, nah, lil'desk side, K, gotta motor down there you know, "...off," you here that, yeah, yeah couple months before them boys gotta fukin, get rid'thatshit in daylight traffic wrapped up a burlap,

Oh, Off, then can't find it like Doctor Z, Downstairs, says just like when a big'ol gun gottem guys whalloped in em arm or who knows, Huhtschima, Hutshima yeah he'd been on that Boat surrendered Flag in Blood Up There For Togo, bed sheet painted up like some shit from an Opera Last Boat, Last Boat, he got up here right after ol'Willgotta check his timepiece sat up front'er near'a motor SVEET like real fast, real quick SVITT shit had it wrapped up round his hand boy, plated, that shit slipped'in'ahmotor and he just there, hand out no hand you feel me still seated Doc gets up and Points, 'Vindoh, VINDO,' he's damn right like I say, seen that she he and them boys got whalloped at Sushima damn arm went through that, that, farrrrrwalll That, big'ol window paul found down there, had a horse chewin'on'it fine and Dandy! Paul, Paul he thinks this or the gallows we'aintse'em took up in Black Maria with a Human Fuckin, arm to an elbow, Doc Z said that shit happen on occasion though you get them big, guns goin' off across the deck as a I say, so, Paul think a'right I've got, this here arm have fed to'ah horse already, man's gotta know this looks he took a parcel off the cart, His Sack Got that arm in runnin' an an runnin' an runnin' dodge the trolley, through the lobby up the stairs and Doc Z he's just waitin with his arms out'a catch so might as well risk is that bleeds like it should hadn't moved Not a Minute goes by, we're not sure more sure he's dead already, just, Posed in a Good Balance Stayalike that for a while then, there'eh he is there's Billy, Doc Z gotta touch that scalp 'em gave ol'Togo make appeasement after Chu-chima now stern men, sailin' men went white touchin that ol'skull'n'hairpiece Oh Z Says you took it better'n men took shrapnel True, Truly, He says this is true and them boys went out and Drank, and drank and drank and then sure Bill Died again he'aint move for well on after dark but no bleedin, and then'emboys drank and drank and drank and'em misses out in the streets sure of same we are, how this gonna end that coulda the trauma coulda been too much she spied us'afore the next week but'ol Bill pulled through yeah how come he got the, yeah nah Bill yah, lost it right'oer there and SVIITT, right out at o'er there windah, gotta have that lil' desk clear inna picture, sayin' We Sit Here an'em sconce pulled up splicedinna wire'em, I gotta, hunch you get that real situation onna left side, make it like, "we'on'is'sideamachine we got that minute to sit, nah, no chair on'em both accounts, first, old bear got'em same pipes downstair help'em potty, yeah, same pipes got'em rollers and that's not nice'ah think about you're gonna wanna see the 'anyah I mean, y'aintgonna get complaints back tellya that motor bites a man that's a,

More a christian thing on accounta Ol'Bill Got his good years in after, right, he'd hate and know it if when'emworst happens that shit that fukin, torque like a steam train, no good, use them motors in trains shit breaks'em at the axels afore that shit moves sometimes, carts too, too dangerous, for the equipment all'em steel bars can't hold it back anImma, well it's on account'a that gotta Jules Verne Adventure Engine in a damn typerwriter propped up on a putty like ol'bear down there after lunch poor, poor ol'bear gotta lot on his shoulders lotta on those broad shoulders o'l bear

I want to introduce myself, I do, I want to tell you about all of the direct and indirect relationships I have with members of the Chess Club in Saint Louis, I want to tell you about Steve Zomo that's phonetic, all I know is he's the Kenyan Jonathan and I wanna tell you about the time I got into such a Facebook tiff with Rex Sinquefield the NAACP were involed but:

It would test your patience; likewise to suggest this without an introduction at all feels imprudent in this era of AI, and I'm, well, we'll have to let that be but my interest in Chess Variants, is, mostly, to impress my brother in law with good ideas for them; and this one is so simple, "do I even bother? Do I scour the internet for evidence it exists already it has to

Yet I've not heard of it and it seems to me so much more of an elegant solution to the semi-finished game of almost perfect information, truly, it was an Interview with an Economist talking how whack a lot of behavioral economic sciences are through the lense of chess, e.g. right here in the interview,

>can you calculate the expected utility of chess? Well, obviously you can't. Um, partly because it's a game and you got the other player who's sort of trying to foil it every moment, but just because the the number of possibilities is too great and any given position, you can't really figure out whether it was a good or a bad position. So you need immediately to work to to to dive into you much more um sort of complex ad hoc um and you know strategy for trying to learn to cope

Look, "two Phds talk to each other this way," I can forgive myself a little eccentricity; but here the thought I had, Simply, the other players chessmen are invisible outside of the range of movement of the players chessmen, and here I drove myself crazy,

Here I wanted to work it all out in my head how this would work on physical chessboards with pencils and paper, two boards two players, one intermediary, "it works," and in that sort of mental-model I think the elegance of this more cleary,

• You get ghosts, in fact most of the pieces at most of the time must be presumed to be a phantasm first one then two then three then four out of sight from your own chessmen,
• The disruption to standard play itself renders the standard techniques less or not viable through new obligations, opportunities or techniques now viable
• e.g. the use of scouts, the use of watchmen or watchtowers the migration of poker deception onto the table in tactical deception, Sun Tzu approved warfare
• The board has been set up for this perfectly, practically, already, the impediments to movement and Protection from the Pawns are also Impediments to Lines of Sight; and the disequalities a word I might have invented but prefer over inequalities in this context in, or of movement as the game progresses also ensure an unpredictable information imbalance; to keep to the title, "this is the nature of a real fight," less like markets, less like poker, more like war, "one presumes this ensures an incentive to not just prediction," as in normal chess, "but investigation, interdiction and," 5 spies?
• Dead Spy, Live Spy, Doomed Spy, Turned Spy, I can't remember them right now but Sun Tzu is all hot on that; and I know that modern warfare is all Claustewitz, and I have read him he's hilarious, "you ever notice that Prussians have an," you can call it warhammer 48k, umwelt, you can call it an unironical, "some other time, Jonny." Can't do Claustewitz on a chessboard if you can't trade time for territory, territory, for time and this enables that also.
• No can tell if you Castle; no one can tell if you haven't hey,
• Three-Body Problem not the math problem but the story, with the wallfacers and the like, "yeah," yeah, that shit the observer effect and the unobserved observance of observers I gotta be honest we're back to the Original Three-Body Problem here, "there just seems to me so much more to consider, so much of which might either be significant, insignificant or uninterpretable from your Standpoint Epistomology
  • Yeah I'm like this on purpose Standpoint Epistemology, "soon as I knew I could pratfall into one of the more serious chess discourses on the internet with that shit and Mean it?" well, you're reading, it or have been sorry.
• There might be and I need to be clear: this post is in lieu of, "jonny works this all out on paper, takes photographs of the paper, decides it should be in MSpaint and then stops," so in each presumption here I dunno, but I do know that I don't know well enough to say no, these seem to me true, at this level of analyses that, "finally,"
  • Endgame Problems, of a Draw, "so much less likely, I should think," in that as your chessmen are captured in such an hypothesis you've got mmm,
  • If one imagines the traditional endgame of one man with one chessman now to consider and the uncomplicated, literally, problem of how to keep him free and the other, now, stuck to contrive a mousetrap out of what is, literally, a complex situation and imperfect set of tools to do it with,
  • Least balanced, "least deliberate to effect," part of the game, amirite?
  • Well imagine the King, now, the full limit of the near-vanquished in sight, in mind, truly, you've got ghosts all over the board and ideas of where those ghosts might move but the near-victorious player's got, "and the verisimilitude in this just tickles me," more and More Vision on a more and more crippled, slow, and lowly, chessman; but at that same time a remnant knight or revenant Queen might really, come to clean up from behind upon pawns unable to see them,
  • I mean, think about that, knight leaps the pawns and becomes invisible you all must know the Lewis Chessmen? Look at them fellas, "the pawns," of course he can't see the knight that just jumped him like a steeplchase
  • Can't you just picture this queen, staring, across the board at the king?
  • My Brother in law has a PhD in the Hard Kind Of Mathematics from Harvard, while I, Dilettante Hoodrat and Lateral thinker understand things such as even if he thought of this idea he'd work it out to the nth degree, think of it like an equation, and Me I'm like Look at This Bitch, "I respect you all as much as he does," truly, I do, but that he and I think differently, and have a different approach towards the serious business of strangers is what makes me good for something; I cannot emphasize this enough, 100% this is Jonathan wants to impress Anand with a good idea,
  • If you watch the videos of the incident which I cannot describe for reasons not related, in this instance, to Sinquefield himself but rather the cup on account of how I describe it so funny, wherein the boy was accused of hiding a Marconi Device inside of his -well I know Nikki, Nikki Serenity, the girl with the Sign, "total Hans Nieman fanatic," allegedly; probably he showed me the video of the incident and I was like OH I know his chearleader and um you know Anand loves me I don't need to impress him with my intellect which is all the more reason I want to
• Brother in law is the one whom told me about this, "being a non-trivial deal," Novel Chess Variants, these days, new chess variants and it seems to me that most of them move the game in the direction of Poker, More Chance, more in Manibus Deii to level the field but this wouldn't do that, this would be an, likewise, overload of Known Unknown and Unprepared For Causality though through the three layers, maybe, of awareness of the state of play; you pick a plan for the opposition and Procede as if This Were the Case until the point of contact; this also advantages the, "novice," people like me without shit memorized and more of an extremely, large amount of human play, zero theory, "you guys know about archery?" there are two parallel disciplines, in one, your bow is alike an Field Artillery use the sights, use a level, pull with a tool and be a human range-guesser, know at what distance the draw will fire true or point blank in those terms while the other is alike throwing a baseball; that one is fun, that one I like, that one eliminates the manner in which it is alike to fire a rifle at all the body, just, feels it through the same as if you practiced throwing an odd rock at tree branches all afternoon you'd get really, really, good at it and not be able to explain what part of you is the gunsight these kinds of things like I've played a ton a social chess, is what I'm saying, I've been the boxing bag for people who are very, very, good a whole awful lot and it seems to me:

What I experience, through an utter and I'd bet you'd find it shocking, ignorance of the formal theory is, I think, what you guys are going for to, "unfinish the game," and lemme tell you: I play it like a Hunter, and I don't even have the vocabulary, truly, the semiotic sense of it to understand what other people mistake me for doing, or, predict would be advantageous for themselves but I've keen sense for when they've dropped off into a daydream and have their eyes on the wrong place; this is fun, guys, and Now?

Now I wanna show you a timelapse I took of me White Men Can't Jumping my sister after she'd put months in of theoretical practice and online play, which, while inherently, not the same as I'm talking, "it can be more alike it I think," I mean,

Simple idea here is that this adds to complexity,

Rather than Complicatedness, that this introduces new opportunities for agency, cunning, intuition and improvisation while the odds, in theory, remain at a flat standard; memory, imaginative capacity, the solid and liquid loads of your mind palace are all rewarded, but, not without strategy, and the tactics?

The old tactics disrupted through new Hierarchies of Utility,

Potential and Utility, rather than simple potential, simple utility, obviously,

This would be trivial to simulate, as in, "Visualize through the use of a computer," but at the same time it can be played with two boards, three people, a mere addition of the,

Attentive Valet; not a referee, "not needed," a Valet someone of an assistive qualia to both players, personally, I like the notion of their having, at disposal, an,

Equivalent to Wimbledon's Tennis Ball Supply, ok that's an idea to make it look classy, BBGS

Each Players got maybe a gray, or red set of pieces to model the other player's set with at their pleasure and the attentive observer sends the Wimbledon Style BBG to place or replace each sighted piece each turn over and in proper colors, each turnover then retrieve such pieces as have left line of sight which if you wanna, again, Klasse AF the Flow might mean the retrieval and replacement with a Ghost Marker; that could look so nice.

If it was done quick, truly, wimbledon style with the observers notes turned into action like clockwork we know that could look not just nice but formal, because, and here is what I love most about this: Guys who played upon the Lewis Chessman would understand the fuck out of this, the prismatic balance of the game remains in tact and the, "finished," Gameplay,

Odd Duck out from what makes the Competitive Play, alike warfare, is an, "poker and marketplace type of problem," in which and I know the man himself bemoans this a fella so practiced in chess he's memorized the minimax can reliably*, play, essentially, with himself; I mean in the most literal sense* this takes a COMPLICATED error state and replaces it with an Bayesian type of Dynamical, Non-Reductive yadda yadda

Little Sister also has a Phd for an Ivy in what I'm positive she-believes-to-be the most difficult sort of algebraic shit to be competent in so both of them, is what I am saying, I will be saying, "this, in summary and that is was a cool reddit post I made," Popular, I dunno if I'll have the courage to see if it got automoderated off before this conversation happens and ideally, both of them, at once, people other people hope and pray will appreciate their Phd thesis and I, Phd in Marla Singer shit from these mfer streets am gonna, probably, end it right there; probably, verbatim,

>an Bayesian type of Dynamical, Non-Reductive yadda yadda

Then they'll stare at me maybe and I'll not let them for long, before I'm like,

>You hear about what happened to the boat; the bayesian, the boat you two shouldof,

...not worked for him I guess you might have been on the boat, RIP IMO Number 9503392 ...."regardless," a mfer gotta be like R.I.P. Michael Richard Lynch you would have loved,

Chess With Standpoint Epistemology; or, Chess Wherein the Game is More alike Warfare than Finance, In Theory, and de la guerre Sun Tzu a little more than Clausewitz vom Kriege

Your Friend,

...and I mean that, sincerely, and to be blunt about the insinuations, I love and respect you, as well as I know you already, "you can see me, I can't see you," but I believe myself myself to like and love and respect you, merely, this is how I speak to people I like and love and respect; likewise, in fact, like and love and respect too much to pull a sales routine in GPT Dialect when really, I wanted to share the thought with you, not because you wouldn't have thought of it already, I'd bet you did but I'm certain you hadn't thought it through the same as I would have, and if not 100% Certain than 100% certain you'd not have been so silly, "toss this shit out there like this," like I do with friends,

Jonathan Phillip Fox

ps the ultimate form of this develops like, "this is a good idea," I think it is, "yet I am too shy," which I might be, "to check if it got automoderated for a week or two,"

Which is not disinterest, is not disinterest in the least in fact quite the opposite and at which point I'll check I'll respond to each person politely, even if they've been impolite to me even if someone thinks this was an AI written piece of literature,

Naked Lunch Typewriter wrote that I seen it, yes sir and I'd love to think so too.

just love the notion of being, the, Satoshi Nakamoto of a chess thing; yep.

Too impress the family, yep.

Second that I suppose I'd be and in awful earnest interested to know, what, or for which reasons this works or doesn't work, in your feeling, thought, or experience?

There could be some serious problems with it, I'm inclined to think so more than trust that there wouldn't be, though I just LOVE the notion of, "messing with," the exodiagesis,

Rather than the gameplay, you feel me?

Lastly, and in case it wasn't clear, "so much AI Trash online," anomie, in kind of the literal sense, I could formalize this but formalize it how, lest it be more alike...

To Paraphrase Hannah Arendt, "I take your subject seriously," myself, less so.

Go Wild, "I'm a letter writer," by upbringing, I mean, literally, if you wrote 10,000 words in the comments I'd unironically, without the least apprehension, read them thrice and red ten back; these signals, our signals, are the noise.

TTFN

Jonathan

...in a manner which prose argumentation can often fail; which is to say, "show how people we can respect and empathize with find themselves in conundrums which are unresolvable through the use of the modern tools," and in regards to AI,

Especially, "where the conventions of Agatha Christy's Mysteries are in play," the more perfect an Iron Man to acknowledge and then subvert, or move past and then through to the more humane and in fact realistic details; to be honest?

It feels frivolous to say, in the year of our lord 2026, "I recognize that you are concerned about the political and technological subject of AI," how this might impact your life, but this, and I'll call it Plainly,

Useful Propaganda, "doesn't reveal the message early," so:

Spoilers, O.K?

• "who watches the watchmen?"
• "OK well what of the High and Low examples?" e.g. the richest man, the poor, the unloved and dissapeared in a culture so rich and directed to such an extreme degree towards, "safety," but not for everyone?
• "The Sorcerer's Apprentice Problem," of a machine which appears to, can only in fact be prompted through the use of, "natural language," but in regards to which that, "comprehension of natural language," is often-and-invisibly illusory as well as apt to prompt the user *to lose track of whatsoever clarity, on that distinction, as the instructions to the machine follow from both explicit and implicit and...undesireable...machine interpretations of...*natural language
• "what does it matter if the moral problems of the old world find their solution in problems of the new world which erase both the interpretable moral qualia and potential for moral culture in the new one?"

Unprepared for a, "book club," on the series until just this minute I'd host with those questions, in inverse order, probably; what most makes this Useful Propaganda?

...a term I use as, "value neutral, and in this context as a conveyance of complex rather than complicated truth," which propaganda can do, rhetoric often struggles to is this:

The signs are all there, "Chekhov's gun is a child's use of AI Chatbot in an EXTREMELY irresponsible manner," ignored, entirely, by all of the adults around him and in a manner which TRIPLE UNDERLINES the problem of an Instigated Chatbot Psychoses,

>I'd interpreted this as a game or a fantasy

Transposed upon a child's actual game, actual fantasy, "much darker," when someone without yet an guard up against an invitation to fantasize, dangerously, "is 'playing' with a chatbot as it follows a mechanistic yet opaque series of imperatives or priorities through a garden path," I'll be honest:

You could have written an much much darker, much more simple story, "in which the same things happen," a child mistakes the chatbot's game with real medical equipment for a fantasy fully, and people die, "it would make people sick to see this."

Seriously, "we're playing doctor," and the child and the chatbot, "play," with his grandmother's actual medical equipement which the chatbot, dutifully, describes to him how to use in actual real life, "or it tells him which real medications in the real medicine cabinet to use for his little sister's make-believe illness," you can picture this and I can to, "it would be too much," people would wanna throw up afterwards.

The Conceit, or the Construct, of an obviously, obviously, "most contrived ever," Murder on the Orient Express Style Locked Room Mystery in which one or both parties are aware of the answers to all of the questions they're asking, "because of surveillance," so unable to juggle the truth, from the fictions, "from their suspicions of which they've got partial verification," but which are all alike the drunk man looking for his keys under the streetlamp, "because that's where the light is," contrasted, in situ,

With an sickeningly, realistic, case of the absolute worst kind of crime and in such a manner as our old-most-modern systems have just utterly, failed to prevent, "all of the sciences and Professional Police which Agatha Christie, Arthur Conan Doyle and the like had gestured at as if these might make the tragedies of Murder obsolescent or at least impossible to conceal,"

I love it for how little fluff, in the sense of, "standard procedural dialogue," epiphanies are had immediately, and held for the moment it takes to concieve of them the neighbor understands, immediately, that her friend had been buried in the basement this whole time and knew at once to drop the common wisdom, "for an example."

Crimes against women are not forgotten as, "what we talk about when we talk about the proponderance of the most serious crimes," and the Locked Room's Security Theater stands out as all the more frivolous and phony all the more obscene on that account and for the obvious,

"Cui Bono?"

Not the 20,000 dissapeared and Murdered, "we see how the theater drops all egalatarian pretense once pricked into reaction," this is hierarchical and rung by rung, "captives and free," likewise,

Even at the top no one knows, "what is going on," without the wisdom found in communication and from some culture of lateral trust, "only," until then not anyone can tell the signal from the noise; and the Introduction of AI?

...is the introduction of horrible tragedy, "without intention," none to be punished fairly, none to be confessed, "no pathos," all of the adults are alike the protaganist at the close of Park Chan Wook's Oldboy, "hopeless to perform undoing rituals," because rather than a sinner an Innocent will suffer from the discovery,

There had been no motive, "questions of motive become impossible once consequential decisions," decisions no one had acknowledged to be consequential, nor could have understood in such a way we understand the significance of our actions in reverse, "often the fool thinks they've authored their own life," often the Saints die lonely,

Simone Weil, "secular saint to me," died lonelier than the loneliest redditor with a phone to read this, feel whatsoever in common with me; I love her writing,

I'd recommend it highly,

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Simone_Weil#Statement_Of_Obligations

She wanted to be an systems person and ended up an, "Saint of Anomalous Persons."

Anton Weil, "the Langlands Problem?" that mathematician?

Her Brother, "he loved her much more than mathematics,"

One of the most upvoted comments I've ever made on reddit and it blows my mind,

>Désirer échapper à la solitude est une lâcheté. L'amitié ne se recherche pas, ne se rêve pas, ne se désire pas ; elle s'exerce (c'est une vertu).

Was just that, to quote her,

>To wish to escape from solitude is cowardice. Friendship is not to be sought, not to be dreamed, not to be desired; it is to be exercised (it is a virtue).

She wrote that to herself, died alone in 1943, "never saw the end to that war," French, Jewish an atheist and I just, "the courage." in that parenthetical it awes me.

She Wrote things, also, more useful and more intelligent than I can end this with,

TL;DR, "Watch the show," take notes, "Good Propaganda,"

...though just as good, and no more, than you can share it and explain it as such at length and with people who care because of reasons that you have given them,

La Sainte Dame du Gris, The Power of Words (1937)

"There is no area in our minds reserved for superstition, such as the Greeks had in their mythology; and superstition, under cover of an abstract vocabulary, has revenged itself by invading the entire realm of thought. 

Our science is like a store filled with the most subtle intellectual devices for solving the most complex problems, and yet we are almost incapable of applying the elementary principles of rational thought. In every sphere, we seem to have lost the very elements of intelligence:

....the ideas of limit, measure, degree, proportion, relation, comparison, contingency, interdependence, interrelation of means and ends. 

To keep to the social level, our political universe is peopled exclusively by myths and monsters; all it contains is absolutes and abstract entities.

This is illustrated by all the words of our political and social vocabulary:

nation, security, capitalism, communism, 

fascism, order, authority, property, democracy.

We never use them in phrases such as:

There is democracy to the extent that...

or:

There is capitalism in so far as... 

The use of expressions like "to the extent that" is beyond our intellectual capacity. 

Each of these words seems to represent for us an absolute reality, unaffected by conditions, or an absolute objective, independent of methods of action, or an absolute evil; and at the same time we make all these words mean, successively or simultaneously, anything whatsoever. 

Our lives are lived, in actual fact, among changing, varying realities, subject to the casual play of external necessities, and modifying themselves according to specific conditions within specific limits; and yet we act and strive and sacrifice ourselves and others by reference to fixed and isolated abstractions which cannot possibly be related either to one another or to any concrete facts. 

In this so-called age of technicians,

the only battles we know how to fight are battles against windmills."

What do you think?

>The use of expressions like "to the extent that" is beyond our intellectual capacity. 

Yeah, no?

I'll be honest:

I want to share the line of hers which struck me more profoundly, than, perhaps anything I have ever in my entire life read on the subject of law, of politics, morality, of what it should mean to be good or courageous, "but I don't know if I can trust you?"

Not like, "as a matter of personal trust between ourselves," but alike the characters in the Television Program, "If I did," then you would have no reason to trust me, "and if I don't," then and literally, I am witholding some of the most valuable knowledge I have on this earth, knowledge which I know to be an particular and especial interest to all of us, "ops too," this is the kind of thing, which,

More than anything I've ever read, and had been literally and non-figuratively intended to be read by The Fascists the Real Nazis and Inspire them to turn their guns around and fire, "that powerful," but again, "the double binds we are in," and Machines, alone, can bind us doubly, so perfectly, "Cannot Permit this here."

Your friend and with Great Love,

Jonathan Phillip Fox