u/JustNotThatSerious

First round of FORM 1's Disapproved - Model Name questions
▲ 8 r/Form1+3 crossposts

First round of FORM 1's Disapproved - Model Name questions

So - submitted a few Form 1's in two batches. First batch was disapproved and I resubmitted to correct. Second batch may have similar issue not sure whether to withdraw and resubmit, submit a second with the same serial, or wait and see. My state has new 7/1 AWB laws in place so I was hoping these would get approved beforehand.

Batch 1 issue 1: Anderson Lower, has AM-15 and Multi Cal right below it. I used an existing drop down for the model "AM-15 Multi Cal" and I believe they rejected it b/c it should be just "AM-15" for the model name.

Batch 1 issue 2: Stribog SP9A3S. I put Model as SP9A3S. They told me it should be "Stribog SP9A3S" for the model.

In all cases they stressed that the model needs to match exactly as engraved/stamped on the firearm.

I resubmitted those.

My concern is now:

Batch 2 has some PSA Lowers. PA-15 is engraved. I used drop downs for them - I put "PA15" (no space no dash) for one and "PA 15" (space instead of dash) for the other. I realize now those drop downs aren't vetted and shouldn't assume they are correct.

First - a lesson for anyone else that hasn't experienced it.

Second - if I withdraw and resubmit it def won't be approved by 7/1. If I submit a second form for each - if they approve the first I can withdraw (or let them reject) the second. Is there any chance they reject the first based on a second entry with the same serial - I don't think so but figured I'd check here. Anyone know whether the PA15 or PA 15 instead of PA-15 will lead to Disapproved? And is there any risk in submitting a second set for those firearms so I can start the clock now instead of a month from now if they others get rejected?

These two PA 15 and PA15: unsure if they'll be approved - both should have PA-15 as the model

https://preview.redd.it/dgq9eue1pp3h1.png?width=176&format=png&auto=webp&s=4dc2bcff06b4157dbe55939f9b571ea03db43e8c

https://preview.redd.it/4plb8c6yop3h1.png?width=180&format=png&auto=webp&s=9856bbf585bc02ee8e24929d9fe27bc72c7f72c7

This was rejected b/c it should have been STRIBOG SP9A3S instead of just SP9A3S based on the agent and the markings on the firearm.

https://preview.redd.it/8a1v371sop3h1.png?width=172&format=png&auto=webp&s=35b09bce82392821e5045d8de8370b48ef102b99

This was rejected b/c Multi Cal should not have been in the Model at all. It should have just been AM-15.

https://preview.redd.it/9fm3gz0qop3h1.png?width=184&format=png&auto=webp&s=3bd9f4d5dda16494f3003a36f50555bd9e046e1c

See explanations for disapproval below:

https://preview.redd.it/mlw5smriop3h1.png?width=818&format=png&auto=webp&s=17c46fa044e9e527619b21c8caa1055b92c91d80

https://preview.redd.it/t7cbycznop3h1.png?width=820&format=png&auto=webp&s=c7e5c94377545c692f613535ba60cdb8e49a9a1e

reddit.com
u/JustNotThatSerious — 3 months ago

Folder vs sliding

I am getting my A3 in on Monday. I plan to use it for home defense and would like it to fit into a backpack. I am torn between KES and Strike Industry folding. I plan on forming it and both offer stock swaps for the braces. They both have check support if I go down that line (still figuring out my optic/optic height). How does the SI brace feel vs the tailhook (for “occasional” shouldering) SI seems like just a blade while KES with tailhook has two blades making it seem more comfortable? Anyone also SBR it with these systems? The SI stock definitely looks more comfortable than KES’s. I already a have short stroke and trigger spring otw and still deciding/researching on the best 3lug suppressor combo with minimum POI deviation.

reddit.com
u/JustNotThatSerious — 3 months ago