▲ 455 r/schwiiz

Mir hend nöd z’vill Lüüt. Mir hend es System, wo Vermöge und Oberschicht a allne Ecke bevorzugt.

S’geniale a dere Debatte isch: Millionär und Milliardär im Parlament, Immobilie-Bsitzer, Verbänd und Partei-Elite zeiged permanent uf "z’vill Lüüt" - und de Pöbel diskutiert brav über Zuwanderig, statt über Bodebsitz, Hypothekarabzüg, BVG-Optimierig, Erbschafte, Kapitalgwünn und Mietwucher.

Das Problem isch nöd, dass z’vill Lüüt i de Schwiiz läbed. S’Problem isch, dass z’vill Regle so gmacht sind, dass Vermöge automatisch meh Vermöge wird - und Arbeit, Miete, Krankekass und Alltag immer meh drunter begrabe werded.

Wer Bode het, profitiert devo, dass Bauland knapp bliibt, Bauhöche begrenzt sind und Verdichtig überall blockiert wird. Für Eigentümer heisst das: Boderente. Für Mieter heisst das: meh Miete, weniger Wohnige, meh Druck.

Wer scho Vermöge oder Immobilie het, bechunt billigi Hypotheke als Hebel. Wer nüt het, zahlt Miete und finanziert indirekt d’Rendite vo de andere. Schöns Prinzip: "Du hesch scho vill? Da hesch no billigs Gäld dezue."

Hypozinse chasch vo de Stüüre abzieh. Miete nöd. Das belohnt verschuldeti Immobilie-Besitzer, vor allem bi hohem Iikomme und hohem Grenzstüürsatz. Wenn d’Hypothek optimiert wird, heisst’s Finanzplanig. Wenn d’Miete z’tüür isch, heisst’s halt: zieh doch weg.

Denn BVG. Wenn öpper Karriere macht und plötzlich 250k oder 300k verdient, tuet d’Pensionskass so, als hätt die Person dä Lohn scho s’ganze Läbe gha. Zack: "Vorsorgelücke". Und denn chan mer massiv stüürabzugsfähig iichaufe. Für Normalverdiener theoretisch au möglich - praktisch fehlt halt de Stutz.

Über em obligatorische BVG wird’s no schöner: Kader-Vorsorg, überobligatorischi Plän, 1e-Plän, individuelli Anlage, alles schön im Stüürmantel. Je höcher de Lohn, desto nützlicher s’Instrument.

Süüle 3a isch au so es Ding. Offiziell für alli. Real für die, wo nach Miete, Krankekass, Chind und Alltag no paar Tuusig Stutz vorig hend. Wer knapp lebt, het kei Stüürvorteil, sondern es leers Konto.

Privati Kapitalgwünn sind oft stüürfrei. Lohn wird brav bestüürt. Wenn s’Depot oder Beteiligige wachsed, isch’s elegant. Schaffe wird voll abgrächnet, Bsitz wachse loh viel weniger.

Erbschafte und Schänkige vererbed Klasse ziemlich bequem wiiter: Immobilie, Depots, Firmäanteil, Startvorteil. Und nachher heisst’s denn: "Mer muess halt fleissig si."

Pauschalbestüürig und Stüürwettbewerb helfed vor allem de Mobile und Riiche. Wer gnueg Gäld het, chan Kanton, Gmeind, Wohnsitz und Struktur optimiere. Normali Lüüt hanged a Job, Schuel, Familie und Wohnigsmarkt. Mobil sii isch sälber scho es Privileg.

Und all die Einsprach, Zoneplanig, Heimatschutz, Quartiercharakter, Ortsbild, Schattewurf, Verkehr, Lärm, Grünflächi - tönt alles neutral. I de Praxis schützt’s aber oft eifach bestehendi Eigentümer vor meh Wohnraum und damit vor sinkender Boderente.

Eigenmietwert-Debatte? Wird gern verkauft als Entlastig fürs Rentner-Päärli im alte Hüüsli. Je nach Usstaltig profitiere aber vor allem Lüüt mit vill Immobilievermöge. Mieter bechömed devo: exakt gar nüt.

Und wer nur Lohn het, isch stüürlich ziemlich nackt. Wer Firmä, Holdings, Dividende, Spese, Vorsorgelösige und Berater het, chan ganz anders jongliere.

Unde gits denn d’Gegesiite vom gliiche Spiel:

Kei schwiizweite Mindestlohn. Für es Land mit Schwiizer Miete, Krankekass und ÖV-Preise scho speziell.

Arbeitsverträģ mit 0 Stunde. Arbeit uf Abruf heisst: Arbeitgeber het Flexibilität, Arbeitnehmer trägt s’Risiko. Hüt 40 Stunde, nächsti Wuche 5, Corona 0 - aber Miete, Krankekass und Esse laufed normal wiiter.

Mehreri Jobs, aber trotzdem kaum BVG. Wer drei Teilzeitstelle het, cha zäme es normales Iikomme ha - aber jede Job frisst separat Eintrittsschwelle und Koordinationsabzug. Jahrelang gschafft, aber kaum PK-Guthabe mit Zinseszins. Super fair.

Zahnarzt nöd grundversicheret. Zäh sind medizinisch schibar Luxus. Wer Gäld het, macht Kontrolle, Dentalhygiene, Füllige, Spange und Implantat rechtziitig. Wer knapp lebt, wartet bis es weh tuet - und denn wird’s richtig tüür. Prävention für Riichi, Notfallmedizin für alli andere.

Und denn luegsch ufe zu de Lohnbubble.

Wenn Zürcher Stadträt Richtung 300k statt 250k gönd, wundert’s eim nöd, dass e Tram-Hin-und-zrugg für a Familie mit zwoi Teenager 35 Franke als "günstig" gilt. I dere Bubble isch s’Portemonnaie halt anders kalibriert.

Nationalrat isch offiziell Miliz. Real heisst das aber au: Wer scho Vermöge, Firma, Verwaltungsrät, Lobby-Netzwerk oder sogar Milliarde im Rugge het, cha mitentscheide, was für Normalverdiener „z’tüür“ oder „z’vill Staat“ isch. Und dezue git’s no Taggelder, Spese und Vorsorgbeitrag. Bundesrat sowieso obere Liga. Und gliich tönt Politik oft so, als wär mer ganz nöch bim normale Haushaltsbudget.

Oder Migros: Wenn en Chef mit ca. 900k Jahrlohn (75k im Monat) öffentlich jammert, dass Herr und Frau Schweizer ennet de Grenze günstiger poschted, wirkt das chli speziell. Für ihn isch’s Strategie. Für Familie isch’s Monatsbudget.

Und während mer Kundschaft moralisch gern im Inland bhalte würd, het Migros sälber im Usland und i Nebegschäft sehr hunderti Millione verlocht. Aber klar: Wenn obe verzockt wird, heisst’s Strategie. Wenn unde gspart wird, heisst’s mangelndi Solidarität.

Mini Pointe:

Wenn e Kassiererin drei Jobs het und trotzdem kei richtigs BVG zämebringt, isch das "Flexibilität". Wenn de Chef 900k verdient und d’Lüüt im Dütsche poschted, isch das plötzlich es nationales Problem.

Wenn Arme z’wenig hend, heisst’s Eigenverantwortig. Wenn Riichi z’wenig Stüüre zahled, heisst’s BVG-Optimierig, Hypothekarabzug oder Standortattraktivität.

Mir hend nöd primär es Problem, dass z’vill Lüüt da sind. Mir hend es Problem, dass z’vill politischi und finanzielle Regle so baut sind, dass Vermöge automatisch stärker wird - und Arbeit, Miete, Krankekass und Alltag immer meh drunter verschwinded.

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 6 days ago
▲ 64 r/codex

GPT-5.6 “national security” rollout is just compute rationing with better PR

https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1ufnwkh/breaking_trump_administration_asks_openai_to/

Completely unrelated conspiracy theory:

“national security rollout” also happens to be a very convenient way to not let Codex users instantly turn GPT-5.6 into a GPU bonfire.

Limit it to a few approved enterprise/gov customers, give the code monkeys bigger 5.5 limits, everyone claps.

OpenAI saves compute, Washington gets to look serious, and devs keep burning cheaper tokens on a model that was already good enough for most coding work anyway.

Not a conspiracy theory btw. Just capacity planning with a flag pin.

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 10 days ago

Antigravity IDE with Gemini 3.5 Pro Flash mid burned through all my tokens — am I stuck now?

So, I have been using Antigravity IDE with Gemini 3.5 Pro Flash mid the last days and honestly the combination worked like a charme. Even better than Codex in some of my real world coding workflows, so my trust went up a lot.

This morning I asked it to scan my codebase and find all potential coding patterns that are wasting RAM. It created a really nice report, with findings that looked correct and also useful refactoring suggestions. So far so good.

Then I asked it to implement the top 5 RAM savings from its own list.

It started doing the usual agent loop: change code, run our meta build system, commit patch, repeat. Looked good for a while. But then, shortly before finishing, it stopped with basically “limits are maxed out”.

Now the Antigravity Usage Dashboard shows 0% left for both 5h and 7d limits. This morning it still showed something like 37%-ish left.

And the really dumb part: from what it looks like, it may have read tons of meta build system output lines into the context and just burned all tokens on that. Like… why? This is the exact kind of thing an IDE coding agent should be smart about. Build logs can explode like crazy, and dumping all of that into context feels like setting money on fire.

But the worst part is that I cannot find a proper dashboard showing usage and limits over time. As a heavy Codex user I’m used to having the OpenAI Codex dashboard open, and also codex-lb / codex accounts load balancer dashboard, so I get direct feedback about consumption, remaining limits, where the tokens go, etc.

With Antigravity right now it feels like: “Wow, this works amazingly well” → “Oops, all limits gone” → “No useful explanation what exactly happened.”

Am I just stuck now until limits reset? Is there any better usage dashboard hidden somewhere? And is there any way to stop the agent from eating the whole meta build output like a hungry raccoon in a CI dumpster?

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 18 days ago
▲ 30 r/codex

Tiboi: Codex finally worked, so now you kill it?

Title:
Codex was genuinely useful for real work for the last 8 months. Not demo stuff, not toy apps, but actual daily engineering work. gpt-5.3-codex was the sweet spot: good enough, fast enough, affordable enough, reliable enough.

And now it’s gone. The replacements are either more expensive, worse at following instructions, overthink simple tasks, burn limits like crazy, or just hit Selected model is at capacity.

Tibo / OpenAI: do you realize who brought you a lot of those serious paying Codex users? Early adopters and power users talking about it. People like me telling others “yes, this is finally good enough for real daily work”.

That same word-of-mouth can turn into word-of-bad-mouth very fast. And then instead of recommending Codex, people will start recommending Gemini, Claude, Chinese competitors, local models, whatever actually works.

You finally had massive inflow of real paying users with real retention, not Sora hype or some consumer toy nonsense. And now it feels like you’re enshittifying exactly the thing that worked.

WTH.

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 27 days ago
▲ 17 r/codex

China for the Rescue? GPT-5.3-Codex Is Gone.

For the last 8+ months I've been a happy paying Codex customer.

First GPT-5.2, then GPT-5.3-Codex. Together they helped me build, debug and maintain a large brownfield full-stack system end-to-end. Not toy projects. Real work.

The funny part is that I probably generated more revenue for OpenAI than my own subscriptions. During that time I convinced 5+ fellow developers to become paying AI coding customers, or to switch from Claude to Codex.

Reddit is full of similar stories. Developers found a workflow that worked, paid for it, recommended it to colleagues, and became loyal customers.

Now that's over.

With GPT-5.3-Codex gone, I simply can't get through the week anymore on two Plus accounts. The practical message seems to be:

"Pay $100+ per month or accept lower productivity."

What I don't understand is the timing.

Right before an IPO, OpenAI is removing the model that turned many skeptical developers into enthusiastic paying customers. If there is a similar or better replacement, where is it? Why not clearly tell us?

What's even more interesting: for the last year I barely spent a single minute looking at competing models. Why would I? Codex worked. OpenAI got my money. Everyone was happy.

Now, suddenly, I'm reading about what people are achieving with Chinese models for $10–20 per month. Some claim they're getting comparable results. Others claim they're getting even more done than they did with Codex.

I don't know whether those claims are true.

But the fact that I'm seriously looking at alternatives for the first time in a year should worry someone at OpenAI.

The ironic part is that OpenAI may end up doing more for Chinese AI adoption than Chinese AI companies themselves.

Developers are pragmatic. We use what gets the job done at a price we can justify.

By the end of the year we'll have increasingly capable local AI laptops. Chinese labs are aggressively competing on efficiency, price/performance and accessibility.

Maybe OpenAI knows something I don't.

But from where I'm sitting, killing GPT-5.3-Codex feels less like progress and more like handing competitors a gift.

China for the rescue?

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 1 month ago
▲ 274 r/Fusion360

Rant: After 35 years in software, Fusion 360 still breaks my brain

I've been developing software professionally for 35 years in roles ranging from developer and project lead to product manager and CTO.

Embedded systems.
Distributed systems.
IoT platforms.
Security systems.
UIs.
ERPs.
CRMs.

During those 35 years I've worked on products used by hundreds of thousands of people.

If I had shipped software with the usability, consistency, and error reporting of Fusion 360, I would have been fired from almost every job I've ever had.

This week alone:

  • Revolve around an edge? Nope.
  • Revolve around a line 0.000001 mm away from the exact same edge? Works perfectly.
  • Loft between two ring profiles? Creates a solid blob.
  • Select a profile? One random segment silently deselects itself.
  • Move a sketch? Depends.
  • Move a body into a component? Sometimes copy/paste. Sometimes cut/paste. Sometimes neither.
  • Error message: "Profile is invalid."

Which profile?

Where?

Why?

Fusion knows.

Fusion won't tell you.

The most frustrating part is not that complex CAD operations are difficult.

The frustrating part is that simple operations constantly fail for reasons hidden somewhere between timeline state, sketch state, projected geometry, topology, component activation, construction history, the phase of the moon, and Autodesk's ancient tribal knowledge.

Every task that looks like a 30-second operation somehow turns into a 45-minute debugging session.

And that's the part I genuinely don't understand.

This is not a new product.
This is not a beta.
This is software with millions of users and more than a decade of development behind it.

Yet it still feels like a collection of edge cases that accidentally achieved consciousness.

Rant over.

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 1 month ago

Repeated WSL2 crashes in Mirrored mode (E_UNEXPECTED) + brief Windows network drop (May 26–27, 2026)

Hi all,

Posting this in case others have seen something similar recently.

My setup is a Lenovo T14s Gen 6, ordered as part of a larger organisational order (hundreds) with the same config in October 2025:

  • Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 / Radeon 860M
  • 32 GB RAM
  • Windows build 26200.8457
  • WSL2 / Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
  • VS Code with the WSL extension

My workload is a fairly heavy WSL2 development setup:

  • Zephyr / nRF Connect SDK development
  • west builds and cross-compilation
  • Docker, tooling, automation
  • everything inside Ubuntu 24.04 LTS on WSL2

I have been running WSL2 with networkingMode=Mirrored for roughly 6 months without major issues. WireGuard is sometimes enabled, sometimes disabled.

On May 26, 2026, while actively working, WSL suddenly started crashing repeatedly with:

  • Wsl/Service/E_UNEXPECTED
  • Catastrophic failure
  • process exit 0xffffffff

At the same time, Windows networking briefly disappeared and then came back.

From Event Viewer logs — Hyper-V, HNS, NetworkProfile — around 12:10 and again around 12:39–12:40, I could see roughly this pattern:

  • HNS removing mirrored endpoints
  • Hyper-V recreating compute/network state
  • WSL / Hyper-V firewall being reinitialized
  • NetworkProfile connectivity flipping from false back to true

After that, VS Code WSL was broken as well. code . from inside WSL no longer worked. I then updated WSL from the console, which brought me to WSL 2.7.3.0, and after that VS Code / WSL started working again.

Today, May 27, the same pattern happened once more. I also briefly saw:

  • Wsl/EnumerateDistros/Service/E_ACCESSDENIED
  • 0x8007000e

The important part: afterward, the distro itself looked healthy. wsl --status worked, the filesystem looked intact, and the distro started normally again. So this does not look like a corrupted distro.

Relevant .wslconfig:

[wsl2]
networkingMode=Mirrored
processors=14

Versions:

  • Windows build: 26200.8457
  • WSL: 2.7.3.0
  • WSL kernel: 6.6.114.1-1
  • WSLg: 1.0.73

Recent updates before / around the time this started:

  • KB5089549
  • KB5087051
  • KB5092762
  • KB5096566 — Phi Silica AI component update
  • multiple Defender intelligence updates

Additional datapoint regarding WireGuard:

I checked the WireGuard history because some of the crashes happened while WireGuard for Windows was active.

What I found:

  • installed WireGuard version: 1.1
  • wireguard.exe timestamp: 2026-05-07 12:48
  • registry uninstall/install date: 2026-05-12

I could not find clear evidence of a WireGuard binary/app update exactly matching the WSL crash window on May 26–27.

What is notable though:

Repeated Windows service events related to tunnel service recreation:

  • WireGuard Tunnel: VPNMWFritzbox service installed on 2026-05-26 10:10:48
  • similar service install/recreation events also appeared on:
    • 2026-05-12
    • 2026-05-16
    • 2026-05-19

I also found earlier related service errors:

  • The object already exists
  • No such host is known

Interpretation so far:

  • I currently have no proof that a WireGuard software update directly caused this.
  • I do have evidence of recurring WireGuard tunnel service churn during May, which may potentially interact badly with WSL mirrored networking / HNS / Hyper-V networking state rebuilds.

Has anyone else recently seen mirrored-mode instability combined with Hyper-V / HNS / WSL networking rebuilds?

I am especially interested in whether this affects:

  • newer Lenovo systems
  • Ryzen AI systems
  • WireGuard users
  • WSL mirrored networking users
  • people on recent Windows Insider / 26xxx builds

This Windows installation has honestly been the least stable Windows system I have used in 15+ years. Yesterday I gave up and disabled S0 Modern Standby / Fast Boot (empty battery every morning, crashes, blue screens) and switched the machine back to classic hibernate-based behavior like my laptops used for years.

For comparison, before this machine I had essentially the same development setup running on a ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 with a 10-core Intel i7, 32 GB RAM and Nvidia A600. That machine was loud, but Windows and WSL2 itself were rock solid.

So my current suspicion is not “broken Ubuntu distro”, but something around Windows networking, HNS, Hyper-V firewall integration, mirrored networking, power management, AMD or a recent update.

Has anyone found a proper long-term fix or a reliable workaround?

Any ideas what is actually happening internally here?

reddit.com
u/Large-Style-8355 — 1 month ago