The Three of Swords (A Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser omnibus) review

The Three of Swords (A Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser omnibus) review

TL/DR: A mixed bag of stories featuring the classic pulp fantasy/sword and sorcery characters Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser told in chronological, not publishing, order.

There’s a lot here. This omnibus collection collects three collections: Swords and Deviltry, Swords Against Death, and Swords in the Mist. Together they cover the backstory, meeting, and first few years of adventures for Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser.

For those who don’t know, these are two classic pulp fantasy/sword and sorcery characters who first appeared in the 1939 story, “Two Sought Adventure”. Fafhrd is the giant of a northman with the soul and temper of a skald. Mouser is a short cosmopolitan rogue with a slick tongue and a little bit of magical skill (“tall and small” has a long history). Mostly created by Fritz Leiber, this pair has been a huge influence on fantasy for decades, and maybe invented the Thieves Guild trope as we know it.

Swords and Deviltry includes a backstory novella each for Fafhrd (“The Snow Women”) and the Grey Mouser (“The Unholy Grail”) that work as their origin stories. A third story tells of their first meeting (“Ill Met in Lankhmar”) and also introduces the notorious thieves guild of Lankhmar. A short introduction sets the scene and tone of the world of Newhon.

Overall this is the most solid collection. The stories have the density of the era, in this case it’s 1962 and 1970, and it serves the tales well. They’re nicely atmospheric with a generous sprinkling of words not in common use today, which adds to the whole feel.

Swords Against Death is an expanded and revised collection previously released as “Two Sought Adventure”. There’re ten short stories here, dating from 1940 to 1970. All are good but some better than others. Several are all about Fafhrd and Mouser’s perilous ocean voyage to the far side of Newhon (like Columbus thought he was going to do from Europe to Asia) and their overland return home. These all had their moments (and one or two fantastic ideas), but I enjoyed the ones taking place in and around Lankhmar (“Thieves House”, “Claws from the Night”, and “Bazaar of the Bizarre” in particular) much more.

Swords in the Mist collects stories from 1947 to 1968. I thought this the weakest of the group. “The Cloud of Hate” and “Lean Times in Lankhmar” I enjoyed greatly. Here we meet the cult of Hate and the monster it can manifests, and Issek of the Jug, which includes an epic scene of Fafhrd mistaken for the miraculous presence of one of the gods in Lankhmar (as opposed to the gods of Lankhmar which are a totally different sort of being).

“Their Mistress, the Sea” takes them on another voyage and here’s where I thought things went off. In fact, from this point on through I was tempted many times to just stop. TMtS and the two that follow it, “When the Sea-King’s Away” and “The Wrong Branch”, felt by the numbers predictable. The last, “Adept’s Gambit”, longer than the others by far, is, I think, the reason why.

With “Adept’s Gambit”, Lieber moves Fafhrd and the Mouser to our world in ancient times. Lankhmar become Tyre. Their is an extensive adventure that (happily) sums up a series of fetch quests to get to the set piece of the climax. This was written in 1947 and a move to make FaGM multiversal heroes, something built upon in later stories but apparently that came out of nowhere for “Adept’s Gambit”. The three that preceded it in this omnibus were written in 1968, 1960, and 1968. The ones from 1968 feel like they were written out of a need to explain why our heroes changed worlds (and personal histories).

In short, this is a mixed bag of stories. You may wish to find one of the individual collections to see if old-school, pulpy, sword and sorcery fantasy is even for you. If it is, there’s a lot to love in this omnibus. There’s just also some things I found to be skimmable.

u/LaughingFoxson — 6 days ago

Review: Gideon’s Sword - Preston & Child 2011

Gideon’s Sword

Preston & Child 2011

Review

This is the first book in Preston & Child’s Gideon Crew series. As a thriller it hits the marks it should hit, the writing is engaging, and the set-up has the right blend of the familiar with something new and interesting. There are some things about it that put me a little off though.

The book opens with us meeting Gideon Crew and seeing Preston & Child establish his credentials as a bad-ass expert with flaws. There are a few opening chapters that present his childhood tragedy, the revelation about the villain behind it, and then Gideon getting his vengeance after years of work.

Once that’s done, he’s recruited by a mysterious group working with the government to go solo on a very important mission to get the MacGuffin. There’s he’s also informed of something that colors every decision he’ll make. From there he faces the person or persons going after the same thing, consults his only real ally, connects with others to help him, and bluffs his way into getting a lot of the pieces he needs to put together. Along the way it gets personal, Gideon is desperate and out of option, and the climax is a frankly fantastic set piece. There’s also a nice little character beat at the end before the set up for his next mission is presented.

It sounds like I’m ripping on the book but my point is if you’re looking for a good thriller this one fits the bill. My only real complaint is I think he gets too lucky too often.

What follows may contain more information than readers who, like me, want to go in knowing as few details as possible. So spoiler warning.

If Gideon’s age is established I either missed it or forgot. I’m picturing him in his mid-twenties. He’s got a doctorate, a good job at lab, and a new realization that his life is empty now that he’s gotten the revenge he worked so long and hard for. When he’s recruited by Effective Engineer Solutions, a government contractor hired to solve problems, he’s presented with the well-paying task of getting the plans of a super-weapon from a Chinese national fleeing to the United States. They also tell him that due to an inoperable, terminal condition that will see him dead within a year, two at the most.

That twist I like. Since there are five Gideon Crew books he’s squeezing a lot into those years. His luck, I don’t like so much. Early in the book, a henchman who goes back years with the villain, ultra-loyal, has Gideon dead to rights and opts to not kill him as ordered because Gideon, who he’s just met and has been fully sold on being the bad guy, convinces him the boss he’s been so loyal to all these years has lied to him and this bad guy he’s been sent to kill, after likely killing dozens of ‘bad guys’ on his boss’s orders, is not really a bad guy. My suspension of disbelief snapped right there. The women who fall fast and hard for him, one ready to dive feet first into his dangerous world, were something else I thought were too much. There’s a great twist with one I should have seen coming but didn’t, so mad respect to Preston & Child for that perfectly executed bit.

Really Gideon’s best talent seems to be spinning lies to convince people to let him go where he needs to go and see things he needs to see to put the pieces of the mystery together. And it’s a good mystery. The super-weapon angle is not what it seems and I liked that a lot.

So anyone who enjoys political action thrillers should find this introduction to Gideon Crew, other than being a little dated now, a fun read.

reddit.com
u/LaughingFoxson — 2 months ago

Sourcery – Terry Prachett, 1988 - a review

I’m not sure how I managed to read for decades and never before opened a Terry Prachett book. One more party where I’ve arrived very late, but here I am, jumping in at Book 5 of Discworld.

For anyone somehow unfamiliar with Terry Pratchett’s Discworld the first thing to know is that most of the books, including this one, are complete, standalone stories in a much wider setting spread over 41 books. Characters and stories interconnect, but you’re not facing the task of reading every single book to get a complete beginning, middle, and end. Per a lot a fan sites, you don’t even have to read them in publication order. It’s not like Wheel of Time in that way.

It’s also not like Wheel of Time because it’s funny. Just in Sourcery there’s wordplay galore and dry humor littering the pages throughout.

Sourcery’s story centers around the least successful wizard at a university of them and his extremely reluctant involvement in a magical war between the sentient magical hat traditionally worn by the archchancellors of the university (it possesses the evil vizier of a poetic king to facilitate casting spells) and the eighth son of an eighth son: the Sourcerer, a ten year old boy with a magical staff that is not only also sentient, but holding the soul of his father who’s settling an old grudge against the wizards.

All the while, various tropes of fantasy get twisted, poked at, and subverted. We meet the master thief and barbarian’s daughter who’d rather be a hairdresser, the barbarian hero-in-training equipped with his training manual, and the Luggage, a multi-legged, sentient box, loyal and deadly but prone to temper tantrums and sulking adventures. There’s also all the wizards, who are more like a decorative, slightly tattered social club than a political force. They differ from the ultra-powerful Sourcerers in that the wizards manipulate magic (with debatable strength and effectiveness). The almost-never seen (with good reason) Sourcerers are sources of magic. Hence the spelling that’s probably bugged everyone who wasn’t already in on the joke (or at least didn’t expect there to be one).

Sourcery has aged well. Highly recommend. In time I’ll get to more Discworld.

u/LaughingFoxson — 2 months ago

Review: Triumph of Time (aka A Clash of Cymbals) Cities in Flight book 4 by James Blish 1959

The wrap-up of the Cities in Flight series is a dense presentation of cosmological calculus and theoretical physics with a story squeezed between long paragraphs of exposition and intricate discussion about applying theories to an overwhelming problem.

It has been another generations-long time jump between the last book, “Earthman, Come Home” and the start of this one, which is fine. That’s a good place for a time jump. The story itself opens as one taking a look at the question of how virtually immortal people who have spent centuries as spacefarers adapt when they’ve settled their flying city permanently on a planet. Two young characters, born on that planet, are a device to lend perspective on that theme and though thinly characterized, often with some rapid “telling”, they do the job well.

Some inter-personal conflicts come up along with the presentation of a philosophical movement that I thought were going to be central to the story but, instead, we’re presented with the biggest stakes of all time and space; stakes that diminish those interesting things into bits of sometimes useful fluff for this new problem—which is addressed with those characteristics I mentioned in the first paragraph which often, in a way that seemed, even given the era Blish wrote this story, excessive, and all too frequently presenting sentences even longer and with more subdivided sections than this one, designed as a sort of example.

I looked for but could not find any contemporary reviews of this book or the omnibus collection I’ve been reading, so I can’t tell you how this was received back in the day. From the perspective of the second quarter of the twenty-first century though, it’s a slog (unless you’re particularly found of tromping through the weeds of dealing with an anti-matter incursion). It feels like those parts, which go on and on and on (I skimmed most of them, my eye looking for an indication that something was actually happening) could have been trimmed down considerably. Frankly, it comes off like padding. As does an entire section about what could have been a great sub-plot of a religious movement determined to sabotage things. Instead that’s a problem that’s quickly resolved by way of some clever use of some of that above-mentioned fluff and is only mentioned once, in passing, before the end of the book (despite a blatant hint the end of that problem was not going to be the end of that problem).

The first thing I said in my review of the first of these books was about the “...charms particular to old science fiction.” I’m bringing everything back around, full circle, to that point. Much of old science fiction included an almost lecture style presentation of hard science (or extrapolated science, a precursor in spirit to what we call “technobabble”) and Triumph of Time is an outstanding example of that. Sadly, to me, this meant so much of the promise of Blish’s setting, cities populated by virtually immortal humans flying through space, was left unexplored. The tastes of that promise he did deliver were great. I wish there had been more.

Of the four books, the first two are enjoyable for reasons beyond just being artifacts of mid-century science-fiction. The third falls somewhat short of that mark. The finale more so – but it does come to a satisfying ending amid all the drawbacks.

Postscript on those particular charms: I read long ago how of all the things classic science-fiction got right, it was just as interesting what it got wrong. Not only, in this case, how slow humanity’s space progress moved in the twentieth century (see the review of They Shall Have Stars for what I mean), but also how quickly computer technology would advance. In the last two books there are instances of top engineers and scientists using slide rules to solve problems. The computers of the stories are a bank of machines so giant they have literally been sinking into the floor. Meanwhile, whole cities are flying through space much faster than light and people are living for centuries.

reddit.com
u/LaughingFoxson — 3 months ago

Review: Earthman, Come Home - Cities in Flight book 3 by James Blish 1955

The third book in the four-book series is a collection of four Cities in Flight stories, making it the longest of the set. Those four stories: “Okie”, “Bindlestiff”, “Sargasso of Lost Cities”, and “Earthman, Come Home” were published in collections and magazines well before book two saw the light of day (or the stars). All tell about the adventures of New York as it travels the galaxy under the guidance of Mayor Amalfi, aided by his city manager Hazelton.

Like the first two, this installment of Cities in Flight has the hallmarks of mid-century science-fiction, for better and for worse. The big ideas are there in abundance. The characters are memorable. The writing is solid if sometimes cliched (at least from the perspective of seventy years later). It’s nice to see rarely-seen words (I admit I needed to look a few up!) used well instead of being a clear indication the writer had a handy thesaurus and wanted to show off.

As a single ‘book’, Earthman, Come Home suffers from having originally been published as separate, standalone episodes. There’s some exposition dumps thinly disguised as normal conversations, which speaks of Blish not originally having the pages to stretch out. There’s some abilities and items that come out of nowhere in an “Oh, by the way, he can do this and always could” that might not have been so stark with months between reading one story and the next.

Finally, there’s the poor depiction of passing time, which took me out of the story two or three times. Because of medicine, human life is measured in centuries. Centuries are passing between stories. Decades are passing within. This is rarely mentioned. When it was, I found it jarring. This character was only brought onboard last story but now you’re telling me she’s three hundred years old? Where does the time go?

The drawbacks of the book don’t at all outweigh the cool parts (presuming you have the patience for classic science-fiction in the first place). There’s a lot of well-explored great ideas here, enough that each story could have been its own full-length novel. If you read and enjoyed the first two books, I think you’ll be glad to have read this one.

Next – A Clash of Cymbals concludes the series!

reddit.com
u/LaughingFoxson — 3 months ago

Thoughts on ConvertKit for newsletters

I'm approaching the stage where I'll be starting a newsletter. An author I trust recommended ConvertKit (not apparently just "Kit") but I've seen mixed reviews. Does anyone have experience with it, good or bad?

reddit.com
u/LaughingFoxson — 3 months ago