What if coding agents could checkpoint their own context?

Had a random thought this morning about context rot in agentic coding.

What if an agent could detect when its context is getting dangerously full, take the older \~50% of the conversation, compress the meaning into a compact machine optimized representation, and save it as a md checkpoint?

Something like:
conversation > semantic compression > [checkpoint.md](http://checkpoint.md) \> reinject into context

The raw history could still be archived separately in case the agent needs to retrieve something later.

Another part is making the agent aware of its own context state, so it decides when to checkpoint instead of blindly summarizing at a fixed token limit.

Im calling the compressed representation “gibberlink” for lack of a better name lol, although I know actual gibberlink/ggwave is an audio protocol, not a semantic language.

This probably isn’t a new idea in principle, but I havent seen this exact combination applied to coding agents.

So, thoughts?

reddit.com
u/Legendary_Nubb — 4 days ago
▲ 3 r/codereview+2 crossposts

I finished building the AI patch verification thing I posted about.

I posted here before about a tool that makes coding agents prove a bug exists before they’re allowed to patch it.

I ended up building it. ProofPatch reproduces the failure, gives the agent a separate workspace to make changes, then reruns the checks in a clean verification environment and records the result.

The idea is to stop agents from just saying
something is fixed when the evidence says otherwise.

Previous post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SideProject/s/chsBQCVYr3

GitHub:
https://github.com/Zoroo2626/ProofPatch

u/Legendary_Nubb — 1 month ago

Roblox studio MCP skills are interesting

So RS just got an interesting update. They introduced Skills, and even a skill for creating more skills. Looking through them, some of these are basically things I was already experimenting with through my CLI workflow, but now roblox is bringing official versions of them. The built in ones like docs search, scene analysis, unit testing, and performance profiling are actually pretty cool. What skills do you guys think would actually be useful to make? Since the MCP already knows studio better than a normal CLI workflow, I'm curious what skills would actually make sense to build on top of it.

reddit.com
u/Legendary_Nubb — 1 month ago

Why is nobody sharing Roblox AI workflows?

Anyone else noticed there's basically no public ecosystem around Roblox CLI skills, MCP servers, or agent workflows?

I've been building out my own setup, and every single session I end up discovering another workflow or capability that isn't documented anywhere. Compared to other development ecosystems, it feels almost empty.

I'm starting to think the people who have actually figured this stuff out just aren't sharing it because it's a genuine advantage. And I don't blame them at all. I ended up building my own vector database with embeddings and chunked documentation that my AI can reference through MCP while developing along side me. (Im not a full time dev in roblox).

Has anyone found solid public repositories, or is everyone just building these internally?

reddit.com
u/Legendary_Nubb — 1 month ago
▲ 2 r/PythonProjects2+1 crossposts

GitMRI:CLI that generates offline HTML dashboards for git repos

Hey everyone,

Built a simple CLI tool called GitMRI. You give it a local folder or a GitHub URL, and it generates a static HTML report showing commit activity, top contributors, and file hotspots. No sign ups or anything, it just opens a local file in your browser.

Install: pip install gitmri

Try it out on a public repo: gitmri scan https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi

Repo: https://github.com/Zoroo2626/GitMRI Let me know if you find any bugs, would appreciate insights as well.

u/Legendary_Nubb — 1 month ago

Bugcrowd suspended my account while a valid 1 click ATO I reported is still exploitable

Got hit with a 30 day suspension for "low quality submissions" after reporting what I still believe was a legitimate 1 click account takeover. The report was fully reproducible from my testing, I requested clarification through that request a response thing before it expired, never got a technical response, and now the vuln still exists to this day. Not naming the program for obvious reasons, but has anyone else had a report rejected, asked for clarification, and just ended up getting automated responses instead of an actual review? I get that there is a lot of AI slop here, ive been around the computer field for a few years now, had success with it 3 years back. AI stuff does ruin a lot, automated checks are getting common. Also found out that if you dont include video/image/text proof, it almost certainly will get dismissed. I respect their policy, not asking for an appeal, just awareness.

reddit.com
u/Legendary_Nubb — 2 months ago

Submitted a response request for an old style ATO… welp

Used to get a few vulns accepted a few years back when there was less competition with the AI stuff, so I thought this one was pretty solid too. It was basicaly an account takeover through a email change mutation but got marked NA because I didnt include enough image or video proof apparantly. Sent a response request now telling them I can provide whatever proof they want, so welp… guess we see

reddit.com
u/Legendary_Nubb — 3 months ago

Auto Open Edited Files does NOT work anymore.

I've been using anti-gravity for a long time now. It has been buggy and everyone knows it, I bought google one pro on 3 accounts- so 60 a month, gets my work done so not complaining about that. But this specific bug is bothering me, recently I noticed that this feature is not working at all. It does not open edited files, walkthroughs, or heck- even implementation plans. I cant reject its code, doesn't give me an option to do so. If anyone faced this before, how did you fix it?

u/Legendary_Nubb — 3 months ago