
Cabinet did not discuss Anwar's Taiwan remarks, says Fahmi
This is the first time I have seen the government need to do PR damage control for Anwar 😂🤣

This is the first time I have seen the government need to do PR damage control for Anwar 😂🤣
"All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away." - Sun Tzu.
The current political dilemma facing PM Anwar, specifically the electoral alliance between BN and PN following the Negeri Sembilan polls, is an interesting political dilemma. On the surface, it looks like a death sentence for Pakatan Harapan. Yet, Anwar and PH are no slouches when it comes to politics. Anwar is arguably the most shrewd active politician. And upon a more broader analysis, there appears to be strange events ongoing which point to a more sophisticated plot.
So, in order to make sense of the situation, I’ve been thinking about this: if I were Anwar Ibrahim right now, how would I win the next general election (GE16)?
To state the obvious, PH cannot win GE16 alone. Even assuming they manage to cement an alliance with GPS/GRS, A formal BN-PN alliance would consolidate the conservative Malay votes in our First-Past-The-Post system and is predicted to be able to form government on its own. Hence working with BN is basically a necessity if you want to remain government.
Currently, PH suffers from two main problems: a) reduced reformist support, and b) BN appears to be somewhat defecting to PN.
On paper, it makes sense for BN and PN to collaborate. You eat PH's seats together. But it seems strange that if it was this simple, then why was it not done earlier?
Historically, UMNO and PAS are actually rivals who share the same voter base but different stances, with UMNO representing moderation and status quo while PAS supports radical policies.
There are also many different factions within UMNO. If I were to arrange them generally, I would say there is a moderate faction that benefits from the current unity government, and a radical faction that benefits from working with PN. The idea is that if UMNO works with PN, it would scare away moderate and pragmatic voters, and certainly non-Malay voters from both MCA and MIC, which would reduce the power and make things far harder for the current moderate politicians in UMNO.
So if I were Anwar, my strategy to approaching BN would be to exploit the internal civil war taking place within UMNO and BN.
Who are these politicians within UMNO that benefit from the current government? The most obvious would be Zahid, but mostly to do with personal reasons related to his corruption charges, and Deputy Pres Tok Mat who also commands great respect in N9. Other moderate, maybe even progressive UMNO politicians include the MBs of Johor, Perak, N9 and Pahang. PAS's governance is bad PR to these states and the UMNO politicians know this. PH is certainly more centrist and good-for-economy than PAS. If Anwar wants to remain PM, these are the politicians he should support using government resources. Make it undeniable to them that staying aligned with PH will benefit their own position within UMNO.
Then there is the final piece of the puzzle that really perplexed me. I haven't heard a single word come out of Anwar about this BN and PN alliance. Strange. In situations like this, the moment he heard of this arrangement you would expect him to have realised what would happen and immediately demand Zahid cease. Yet he hasn't.
So my theory is: what if this is a trap?
Think about it. Onn Hafiz is quoted to be among the most progressive politicians within UMNO. So is Ismail Lasim who leads N9. In a three-way battle in GE15, we saw how vote splitting led to PAS previously decimating UMNO. So what if the recent state elections were a sacrifice play, to cement the power of progressive UMNO politicians within UMNO and also to stave off PN? Even more so, what if Anwar and Zahid want PN to think they are successfully courting UMNO? We all know UMNO politicians are snakes anyway. By letting PN believe a Malay unity alliance is forming, PN is going to begin to appease UMNO, sacrificing WAWASAN and giving UMNO more seats as well as stop attacking UMNO, which is crucial because then UMNO can begin to build more support among previous PN voters. In the meantime, disillusioned reformists hesitate to support a BN that appears to be aligned with PAS.
Then, at the 11th hour, when PAS demands that they be able to contest the seats they previously won and more, the moderate UMNO factions, who are now far stronger thanks to Anwar's backing, reject the demands. PN is left to rot, while PH and the moderate BN factions use their own vote concentration tactics to decimate PAS and sweep the general election.
At the end of the day, the whole BN-PN alliance is formed solely on the basis of eating PH, ideologically UMNO does not share the same views as PAS and they fight for the same seats, so they can never ally.
"A prince must imitate the fox and the lion, for the lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves." - Niccolò Machiavelli.
Thoughts? Or do you think this is just mad cope?
This was an article from 7 years ago but one I thought all Malaysians should read.
Looks like there are some MPs who have become billionaires during their political career.
What are your thoughts on this?
This was the last sentence of a news article another reddit user posted in this sub a few hours ago.
Some market veterans say that there is still room to go for the unravelling. They are suggesting SK and Samsung, and by extension, Micron, is going to continue to go down in the short-term.
What do we think?
In an X post on July 16, Network School Founder Balaji Srinivasan wrote the following:
"Should the global tech community continue investing in Malaysia?
Given recent events, I raise this question respectfully for the consideration of Prime Minister Yang Amat Berhormat Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim (@anwaribrahim), for the people of Malaysia, and for our friends in the Malaysian tech community. The answer will be of interest to anyone in global tech that’s considering building, investing, or expanding in Malaysia, including executives at Google, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft, founders of tech unicorns like Coinbase and Solana, and investors at the world’s largest venture capital funds like a16z and Polychain.
As context, I am the former CTO of Coinbase and former General Partner at a16z. In October 2024, I opened a startup society called Network School in Malaysia, because I felt I’d been invited in by the government’s pro-tech policies.
Specifically, the KL20 initiative set out Malaysia’s ambition of becoming a top 20 global tech hub. Their MDEC digital nomad visas and MM2H investor visas were created to facilitate an influx of global talent and capital. And the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone was announced to facilitate the flow of capital and talent between Malaysia and Singapore, where I live. When taken in combination with Malaysia’s datacenter buildout and its policy of welcoming visa-free visits for 98% of the world, it seemed like Malaysia might be a great place to build a global tech hub that was simultaneously inexpensive and easy to visit (especially for non-Westerners).
And that’s what we did, by creating Network School. It’s an international tech community with its first node in Forest City, Malaysia. We picked Forest City because it had millions of square feet of empty space, because it was one hour from Singapore’s capital markets, and because it was within the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. Then, within 18 months, without a single penny of government money, we built Network School into a global attraction that brought thousands of engineers, investors, and builders from 70+ countries to learn technology, burn calories, earn online, and have fun, integrating with the local Malaysian economy along the way.
Indeed, in terms of quantifiable contribution to the Malaysian economy, we’ve already invested 100M+ MYR in our campus to make it startup-friendly. For perspective, that’s about 4% of the budget of Johor, the Malaysian state where Forest City is located. We employ dozens of Malaysians directly and indirectly at every level from executive to staff. We’ve backed Malaysian tech startups like Collektr, hosted events for local teams like Superteam Malaysia, and are major customers of many local businesses like barbers, laundromats, and restaurants. We’ve also revitalized the multibillion-dollar Forest City project, causing millions of MYR in real estate appreciation. And, as the video below describes, we were on the cusp of a 500M+ MYR expansion to grow our community, as well as a global merit scholarship with my friend Amjad Masad of Replit.
However, that emerging multi-billion dollar success story — which should rightfully have been hailed as a huge victory for the pro-tech policies of the Malaysian government — is at risk of being derailed by a fake story spread by an anonymous account named MP4P.
In short: on the day before the July 11 Johor elections, MP4P posted an Instagram post falsely accusing Network School of harboring illegal aliens. The sensational accusations caused a tizzy in Malaysia, until Malaysian authorities came to our campus on July 14 to investigate. (I should note that the officers were very polite and professional.) After checking hundreds of physical passports from 40 countries, including dual passport holders, the authorities confirmed to the press on July 15 that all travel documents were in order. During the process, we cooperated fully; in the thread below you can see a photo of the men, women, and children of Network School smiling and holding up their passports in the bright daylight. Our faces are shown and our names are known; we have nothing to hide.
With that said, the process is the punishment. What MP4P did is very similar to the American crime of “swatting”, because MP4P created a hoax report of a serious threat, thereby forcing the Malaysian police to take time away from protecting the Malaysian people towards investigating a nonexistent issue. Moreover, this anonymous MP4P account has also called for Malaysia to boycott Apple, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft…a move that would cost ordinary Malaysians thousands of jobs…even while MP4P’s own Instagram collaborators promote their Apple and Google apps! I mean, we aren’t talking about a credible accuser, but just someone screaming inconsistently at the top of their lungs on social media for traffic, an all-too-common phenomenon these days.
Anyway, at this point, all further investment we were planning to make in Malaysia is on hold until we get sufficient assurance that such issues won’t recur. So are the investment plans of many of our friends, including the execs and investors at global tech firms that we brought to Forest City. Because to put it very plainly: we have invested 100M+ MYR in Malaysia, while creating jobs for dozens of Malaysians, and our faces and names are known. Our Malaysian executives and employees deserve the benefit of the doubt over anonymous internet trolls.
There are two paths forward. In the first case, if Malaysia still wants continued global tech investment, if it wants to be a top 20 tech hub, if it wants us to revitalize Forest City, then we request an audience with the Prime Minister’s office to discuss the terms of a memorandum of understanding between Network School and the Malaysian government, similar to the document recently signed between the Solana Foundation and the Kazakhstan government.
Specifics can of course be discussed, but we would publicly commit to abiding by all Malaysian laws (we already do) and respecting Malaysia’s sovereignty (never in question). In return, they’d get to know our friendly community, and realize that we actually chose Malaysia because we thought it was a great place to build a tech hub where engineers from the global South, investors from the West, and builders from Malaysia itself could meet new people, build cool things, and perhaps create millions of dollars in economic growth in the fullness of time.
That vision of peace and trade, internationalism and entrepreneurialism, is still on the table. We aren’t asking for any money — just a meeting, to help restore confidence in Malaysia as an investable jurisdiction. Alternatively, if you don’t want our investment, or those of our colleagues at billion dollar funds and trillion dollar companies, we will of course respect your wishes, and reallocate our capital to other countries instead.
Either way, we will remain friends and abide by your decision. Please let us know."