
Novated Lease Model Y L
What are your thoughts on this ?
Interest rate is 8.91%
Fortnightly payment - 492.57

What are your thoughts on this ?
Interest rate is 8.91%
Fortnightly payment - 492.57
My partner and I (both 39, no kids/HECS) are getting ready to upgrade our PPOR in Brisbane and want to sanity-check our structural strategy before locking in a broker and tax accountant.
We want to make sure the ATO won't have an absolute field day with our debt tracing. Rate our plumbing.
Our Profile:
Combined Income: $247k PAYG ($147k / $100k split)
Living Expenses: ~$5,000/mo actual (Lenders will likely benchmark us higher on HEM).
Credit Cards: Single $15k limit card (will reduce/close if servicing gets tight).
Current Property (Bought for $630k, now worth ~$1.03M):
Current Loan: $441k (Variable P&I @ 6.09%)
Current Offset Balance: $435k
Effective Net Debt: ~$6k
The Plan & Target Purchase:
We want to buy a new PPOR in Brisbane with a budget of roughly $1.37M - $1.4M. We've estimated our maximum borrowing capacity sits around the $1.1M mark.
Here is the exact step-by-step financial sequence we are mapping out:
The Offset Sweep: On settlement day for the new house, we will withdraw the full $435k out of the current offset account and deploy it entirely as the 20% deposit + QLD stamp duty (~$55k-$60k) on the new PPOR.
Preserving Deductibility: We are leaving the old loan strictly at $441k. Because the original nexus of this debt was used entirely to buy the asset (which is now an income-producing asset generating ~$800/wk rent), our understanding is the full interest on the $441k becomes 100% tax-deductible under TR 93/6 once we move out.
No Top-Ups: We explicitly rejected a bank cash-back offer that required us to refinance the old loan to $500k to extract cash for the new place. We know the "use test" (TR 95/25) means borrowing against the IP for a private PPOR purpose would destroy deductibility and permanently contaminate the loan.
The IO Switch: Post-settlement on the new PPOR, we will call the lender and switch the old loan to Interest-Only to stop paying down the deductible principal. The monthly cash-flow savings will be swept straight into the new PPOR offset.
Day 1 Debt Recycling Architecture: When our broker sets up the new $1.1M PPOR loan, we want to split it on day one (e.g., a $1.05M main split and a $50k sub-split at a $0 balance). Once our cash flow stabilizes in year 2, we’ll pay down and redraw that $50k split directly into a clean brokerage account to buy diversified ETFs (TR 2000/18 compliance).
The Tax Deemed Cost Base: We are booking a formal API certified property valuation for the exact day we move out to lock in our deemed cost base at ~$1.03M under Section 118-192. (Though we will likely explore using the 6-year absence rule depending on how long we hold).
Questions for the sub:
Is there any hidden trap with the Offset Withdrawal Strategy here? If the $435k cash sits in the offset right up until the new property settlement exchange, the original $441k loan remains un-mixed and pristine, correct?
For Brisbane buyers—with an income split of $147k (37% bracket) and $100k (30% bracket), the property is currently held jointly 50/50. Since it's an existing asset, changing the title to favor the 37% earner for higher negative gearing deductions is basically a non-starter due to triggering upfront stamp duty/CGT event A1 anyway, right? We just accept the 50/50?
Any red flags on the borrowing capacity calculations? Will lenders penalize our capacity heavily for having an existing loan on Interest-Only when they calculate our servicing buffers, or should we keep it on P&I during the application process and switch it afterwards?
Keen to hear your thoughts, especially if you've done a similar transition recently. Cheers!
My partner and I (both 39, no kids/HECS) are getting ready to upgrade our PPOR in Brisbane and want to sanity-check our structural strategy before locking in a broker and tax accountant.
We want to make sure the ATO won't have an absolute field day with our debt tracing. Rate our plumbing.
Our Profile:
Combined Income: $247k PAYG ($147k / $100k split)
Living Expenses: ~$5,000/mo actual (Lenders will likely benchmark us higher on HEM).
Credit Cards: Single $15k limit card (will reduce/close if servicing gets tight).
Current Property (Bought for $630k, now worth ~$1.03M):
Current Loan: $441k (Variable P&I @ 6.09%)
Current Offset Balance: $435k
Effective Net Debt: ~$6k
The Plan & Target Purchase:
We want to buy a new PPOR in Brisbane with a budget of roughly $1.37M - $1.4M. We've estimated our maximum borrowing capacity sits around the $1.1M mark.
Here is the exact step-by-step financial sequence we are mapping out:
The Offset Sweep: On settlement day for the new house, we will withdraw the full $435k out of the current offset account and deploy it entirely as the 20% deposit + QLD stamp duty (~$55k-$60k) on the new PPOR.
Preserving Deductibility: We are leaving the old loan strictly at $441k. Because the original nexus of this debt was used entirely to buy the asset (which is now an income-producing asset generating ~$800/wk rent), our understanding is the full interest on the $441k becomes 100% tax-deductible under TR 93/6 once we move out.
No Top-Ups: We explicitly rejected a bank cash-back offer that required us to refinance the old loan to $500k to extract cash for the new place. We know the "use test" (TR 95/25) means borrowing against the IP for a private PPOR purpose would destroy deductibility and permanently contaminate the loan.
The IO Switch: Post-settlement on the new PPOR, we will call the lender and switch the old loan to Interest-Only to stop paying down the deductible principal. The monthly cash-flow savings will be swept straight into the new PPOR offset.
Day 1 Debt Recycling Architecture: When our broker sets up the new $1.1M PPOR loan, we want to split it on day one (e.g., a $1.05M main split and a $50k sub-split at a $0 balance). Once our cash flow stabilizes in year 2, we’ll pay down and redraw that $50k split directly into a clean brokerage account to buy diversified ETFs (TR 2000/18 compliance).
The Tax Deemed Cost Base: We are booking a formal API certified property valuation for the exact day we move out to lock in our deemed cost base at ~$1.03M under Section 118-192. (Though we will likely explore using the 6-year absence rule depending on how long we hold).
Questions for the sub:
Is there any hidden trap with the Offset Withdrawal Strategy here? If the $435k cash sits in the offset right up until the new property settlement exchange, the original $441k loan remains un-mixed and pristine, correct?
For Brisbane buyers—with an income split of $147k (37% bracket) and $100k (30% bracket), the property is currently held jointly 50/50. Since it's an existing asset, changing the title to favor the 37% earner for higher negative gearing deductions is basically a non-starter due to triggering upfront stamp duty/CGT event A1 anyway, right? We just accept the 50/50?
Any red flags on the borrowing capacity calculations? Will lenders penalize our capacity heavily for having an existing loan on Interest-Only when they calculate our servicing buffers, or should we keep it on P&I during the application process and switch it afterwards?
Keen to hear your thoughts, especially if you've done a similar transition recently. Cheers!
​
My partner and I (both 39, no kids/HECS) are getting ready to upgrade our PPOR in Brisbane and want to sanity-check our structural strategy before locking in a broker and tax accountant.
We want to make sure the ATO won't have an absolute field day with our debt tracing. Rate our plumbing.
Our Profile:
Combined Income: $247k PAYG ($147k / $100k split)
Living Expenses: ~$5,000/mo actual (Lenders will likely benchmark us higher on HEM).
Credit Cards: Single $15k limit card (will reduce/close if servicing gets tight).
Current Property (Bought for $630k, now worth ~$1.03M):
Current Loan: $441k (Variable P&I @ 6.09%)
Current Offset Balance: $435k
Effective Net Debt: ~$6k
The Plan & Target Purchase:
We want to buy a new PPOR in Brisbane with a budget of roughly $1.37M - $1.4M. We've estimated our maximum borrowing capacity sits around the $1.1M mark.
Here is the exact step-by-step financial sequence we are mapping out:
The Offset Sweep: On settlement day for the new house, we will withdraw the full $435k out of the current offset account and deploy it entirely as the 20% deposit + QLD stamp duty (~$55k-$60k) on the new PPOR.
Preserving Deductibility: We are leaving the old loan strictly at $441k. Because the original nexus of this debt was used entirely to buy the asset (which is now an income-producing asset generating ~$800/wk rent), our understanding is the full interest on the $441k becomes 100% tax-deductible under TR 93/6 once we move out.
No Top-Ups: We explicitly rejected a bank cash-back offer that required us to refinance the old loan to $500k to extract cash for the new place. We know the "use test" (TR 95/25) means borrowing against the IP for a private PPOR purpose would destroy deductibility and permanently contaminate the loan.
The IO Switch: Post-settlement on the new PPOR, we will call the lender and switch the old loan to Interest-Only to stop paying down the deductible principal. The monthly cash-flow savings will be swept straight into the new PPOR offset.
Day 1 Debt Recycling Architecture: When our broker sets up the new $1.1M PPOR loan, we want to split it on day one (e.g., a $1.05M main split and a $50k sub-split at a $0 balance). Once our cash flow stabilizes in year 2, we’ll pay down and redraw that $50k split directly into a clean brokerage account to buy diversified ETFs (TR 2000/18 compliance).
The Tax Deemed Cost Base: We are booking a formal API certified property valuation for the exact day we move out to lock in our deemed cost base at ~$1.03M under Section 118-192. (Though we will likely explore using the 6-year absence rule depending on how long we hold).
Questions for the sub:
Is there any hidden trap with the Offset Withdrawal Strategy here? If the $435k cash sits in the offset right up until the new property settlement exchange, the original $441k loan remains un-mixed and pristine, correct?
For Brisbane buyers—with an income split of $147k (37% bracket) and $100k (30% bracket), the property is currently held jointly 50/50. Since it's an existing asset, changing the title to favor the 37% earner for higher negative gearing deductions is basically a non-starter due to triggering upfront stamp duty/CGT event A1 anyway, right? We just accept the 50/50?
Any red flags on the borrowing capacity calculations? Will lenders penalize our capacity heavily for having an existing loan on Interest-Only when they calculate our servicing buffers, or should we keep it on P&I during the application process and switch it afterwards?
Keen to hear your thoughts, especially if you've done a similar transition recently. Cheers!