Another come to console post.

I'm not a huge fan of AMS2 (although I adore AMS1) but its still amazing to me that there is literally zero interest from the devs to bring this to console. With LMU and ACevo considering it, we know it can be done and I'll assume, easily.

From my POV AMS2 on PC has a slowly declining future in PC. Let's face it, its not going to bring in more players. Playstation and Xbox needs something better, there's literally just GT7 which sucks balls.

Is it a lack of funding? Is it just lack of vision? Is it lack of talent? Is it just a lack of caring? I mean, what's their response? What's their reasoning for not bringing to this console?

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 2 days ago
▲ 5 r/PSVR

Assetto Corsa Competizione in cinematic flat screen mode is fantastic.

I've only had the PSVR for a week now, and have already played out my GT7 fix I think, but my real love is ACC.

If you have ACC it would do you well to try it using the PSVR2 in cinematic mode. Pop that screen as wide as it will go ( I think it simulates a 100 inch screen), jump into the 2nd cockpit mode (the one without the steering wheel), and set your view distance to 12.4, which is nice and close to the dashboard. Adjust height up just a tad, and your pitch to negative just a tad, so the front of the hood is about half the way up from the bottom of the screen.

This is about as close to VR we are gonna get on the PS5 and ACC and frankly, I don't even need or want to play GT7 now.

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 9 days ago

Only 9 used Highlanders in my area, and 17 Pilots... Hmmm

I did a search on cars.com just to satisfy my curiousity if folks are getting rid of their 2020-2022 Highlanders, and oddly enough the pickings are slim. Compared to the same year range as Pilots, seems kind odd doesn't it?

So with all the people claiming that they've dumped their Highlanders due to the possible trans issue, why aren't there 50+ Highlanders for sale?

Try a search and compare.

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 11 days ago
▲ 0 r/PSVR

It's fine. PSVR2. Not game defining like some say.

I just got the PSVR2 for $180 and played GT7, RE Village, and a couple demos/trials.

I like it, makes gaming different, but no this is not revolutionary.

GT7 is the type of game where you want to be in VR and its looks great, feels great, easier to drive, and frankly don't see myself playing it in flat mode from this point forward.

But RE Village, its ok. I could still play it in flat mode and have just as much fun.

Couple others were cool, and worth checking out. I will def try MSFS2024 because I love flying and driving. I'd imagine I'd rather fly in VR, so that's a no brainer.

So anyway, I'll get tons of hate, yup, wrong forum to post this, but its also for those folks who don't have VR and are thinking its going to destroy the fun in the 2D games. Naw. Its a feature that works for some and meh for others. It has nothing to to with the setup, which I found very easy to do.

..

. . . . . . . .

ps. PSSSSSYCH!! This thing is freaking AWESOME! LOL. I just wanted to see how many folks actually read a post. 🫡

For the first time ever, I'm taking my PS5 with me on vacation. hah

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 16 days ago

26 Explorer Active 200A MSRP $50,320. 2.3L. 4WD.

Looking to add a second SUV to my garage. And Explorers are nice.

Options on top of the 200A:

Active comfort package: $3145

Keyless entry: $455

20" Carbon spoek wheels: $1395.

Remote start, LED fog lamps, Heated steering, LED sig lighting, 8 way power pass seat,

Connectivity package 7 years: $745.

Brand new and dealer offering $42,800 with all the rebates and summer savings.

Seems like a good deal?

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 24 days ago

You guys are absolutely nuts regarding tranny issues.

I have a '22 HL with 95k miles purchased brand new. I don't have any tranny issues (yet) but I am not worried at all, and the paranoia I see on reddit/youtube/internet is nuts. I'll make my points in sections so you can easily respond.

  1. I bought the HL because frankly they are *awesome*. Period. Best SUV out there.
  2. I bought it long term. Not 120k, not 200k, 300k. It will last because the HL is *awesome*.
  3. Selling your HL because of a possible tranny issue is *nuts*. Youre gonna go out and buy a brand new SUV, pay full price again, for an inferior SUV (Pilots aren't superior, sorry bro). And risking issues with the new SUV brand.
  4. Highlanders have *proven* to be long term investments, if youre looking for one night stand, the HL aint for you.
  5. I'm not concerned about the tranny issue at all. If it rears it's head, I will gladly plop down $10,000 for a new *brand new* tranny. Paying another $10,000 for a car to last up to 300k beats paying $50,000 for another SUV that *will* have more issues than the HL ever has.
  6. Stop being paranoid. The tranny isn't gonna just *blow up* someday. It will give you long term warning that it needs replaced, getting louder and louder. Get it replaced, big whoop,. calm down and chill. It's just a car.
  7. If the lawsuit wins, then you'll get some compensation in a few years. Save your receipts. If it doesn't win, who cares.

I'll never lose sight why I bought the HL in the first place. It rides beautifully, shifts effortlessly, tons of power, tons of room, comfortable seats, and ZERO issues. Take care of the HL and it will last you 300k and more. Best bargain in cars.

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 25 days ago
▲ 0 r/Lenovo

I just paid $160 for an x13 yoga Gen 1.

this is the top of the line model from 2020 16 GB of RAM 256 GB SSD i7 vPro chip. I believe it even has an oled screen.

It's definitely in used condition but my gosh what a great laptop. built tough has the carbon steel feel to it.

I assume that's good price?

reddit.com
u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 2 months ago

More collagen found in dinos. Biochemistry previously said it was "impossible".

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/05/260514084421.htm

Now we have yet another one from 2025, an "exceptionally preserved" Edmontosaurus sacrum with collagen remnants. Before they found it, the models said this stuff should break down way faster, and impossible to be found in dino fossils. Then they find it and suddenly start running shor term lab tests with iron cross linking and whatever, claiming "see, it can last!" But those tests aren't simulating deep time at all. You can't run a lab experiment for 66 million years. They're doing months or a couple years max, then excusing like crazy. So they find it in dino bone, go "whoa, exceptional preservation!", time to invent experiments after the fact to make it fit, and act like it was no big deal. How exactly does this dovetail into the eVoLuTiOn theory and the deep time narrative again? It feels less like settled science and more like "our models were wrong... but trust the updated models bro."

Happy reminder: what you think is rock-solid fAcT today might need another "uh..er..duh" moment next week.

They are now suggesting to start examining dino fossils (collegen enriched bones bro) discovered over the last 100 years. 😆

u/Lumpy_Confidence_637 — 3 months ago