Image 1 — Fantasyland vs. World Showcase
Image 2 — Fantasyland vs. World Showcase

Fantasyland vs. World Showcase

I would like to know something about the difference between Fantasyland and World Showcase. They both utilize the same architecture in some areas.

Just to give you an example, the Pinocchio Village Haus has similar architecture to the Germany Pavilion. I have images of the two side by side above, which have similar architecture. Even the area music loops for both sound similar, if not identical (you can listen on YouTube if you're interested). That's just one example. Actually, two examples.

This whole thing about Fantasyland vs. World Showcase grew out of my curiosity about why some people find the Frozen boat ride in the Norway pavilion so objectionable, mainly because Arendelle is not a real place and as such trivializes the World Showcase theme. It's not just ordinary people on social media, either, it's also people who write books about WDW, including Bob Sehlinger and Aaron Wallace, who think that World Showcase should be about real countries first and characters second, and that Arendelle should have been put someplace else, like maybe Fantasyland, which is apparently not about cultures (though even that's slightly debatable given Small World), but about stories. I personally don't have much of a problem with the Frozen boat ride, but a lot of people do.

So what, then, are the differences between Fantasyland and World Showcase? Is it that one celebrates culture while the other does not? Even that's not entirely true, if Small World is any indication. And then there's the complaint about how Tiana's Bayou Adventure has no business being in Frontierland either, but would have fit in Fantasyland.

Again, what does Fantasyland have (or doesn't have) that World Showcase or Frontierland don't have (or do)?

u/MHarrington85 — 13 hours ago

I can't eat that kind of bar because I'm in training! Doesn't Cracker Barrel have any of the other kinds of bars? You know, like energy bars or power bars? Or training bars?

u/MHarrington85 — 1 day ago

Who is this "Luke Stark Iller"? Is he Luke Skywalker's long-lost triplet brother? Well, I don't think I'll be needing his services today; all my stark is plenty ill already.

u/MHarrington85 — 12 days ago

Not talking about regular cards? Almost all of the posts here seem to talk about cards that are either enchanted, iconic or other such expensive cards. They hardly ever talk about just regular card collections in general.

reddit.com
u/MHarrington85 — 14 days ago

Can anyone explain what this parking lot inside the Magic Kingdom is for? Could it be removed for a potential expansion if needed?

u/MHarrington85 — 15 days ago

Happy birthday, Alex Hirsch!

Who knew that he and Matt Chapman would end up collaborating on each other's projects?!

u/MHarrington85 — 18 days ago

Once there were NO Disney characters at Epcot!

Believe it or not, while the Disney characters do appear in all the parks, there actually was a time when, at the time of Epcot's opening in 1982, they did not have any Disney characters in that park at all, on the grounds that they clashed with the serious, scientific identity of that park, that it and the Magic Kingdom were two separate, distinct parks and that any characters that inhabited them should also be separate and distinct. Thus, Mickey and the gang were to be only in the Magic Kingdom and nowhere else. That was the real reason Epcot received such classics as Figment and Dreamfinder, as well as the short-lived Children of the World that appeared in World Showcase. But there were no familiar characters in Epcot as people knew them. Yes, Mickey did show up for the opening day of Epcot, but after that, neither he nor anyone else was seen there for two years! But as with Pirates not being included at the Magic Kingdom early on, guests complained about the lack of any familiar characters. Yet their complaints went ignored. It wasn't until Michael Eisner came in and felt that Epcot's was too museum-like with little to do for children that he ordered the familiar characters be added to the park, and the designers, who insisted that the characters to be restricted to the Magic Kingdom, gritted their teeth and let the characters come in. Mickey and the gang would be dressed in very '80s spacesuits in Future World and various international garb in World Showcase, such as kimonos, lederhosen and sombreros, depending on the pavilion in question. It was indeed a lesson learned about whether characters were or were not allowed in the parks simply because of said parks' identities and themes.

reddit.com
u/MHarrington85 — 20 days ago

Happy birthday, Donald Duck! Maybe it's just the way his pupils look, but I think he doesn't look too dissimilar to how he did in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Take a look and see for yourself.

u/MHarrington85 — 26 days ago

Did the makers of "Digital Circus" look to Homestar Runner for how Bubble should look? Seriously, it looks like Shark-Toothed Bubs (minus the horn)!

u/MHarrington85 — 1 month ago

When Fantasyland was overhauled in 1983, many printed media, including Disney News and the Birnbaum guide, claimed that the teacups would not reopen until the Alice ride reopened in 1984. Yet the DL guidebook showed that the teacup did reopen in 1983, leaving Alice as the sole outlier. Which is it?

u/MHarrington85 — 1 month ago

The Summer 1993 issue of Disney News ran an article on Tokyo Disneyland and how different it is from the U.S. parks. One difference is that they board the boat rides like Pirates by stepping directly to the floor instead of the seat first, as it's a cultural thing. Who besides me does that?

u/MHarrington85 — 2 months ago

"It will always be MGM Studios to me!"

I had watched a video on Rob Play's site about why Disney-MGM Studios was renamed to Disney's Hollywood Studios, and more importantly, why it was called Disney-MGM Studios to begin with, which were mainly for legal and financial reasons. What really gets me is why everyone still refers to it as "MGM Studios" or even just "MGM", when the MGM name, as we speak, has been pretty much purged from the park's existence, for financial reasons, mainly, as the video explains. The park has come a long way since its beginnings as an actual studio. I personally refer to the park, either way, as just "The Studios". That way, regardless of MGM's existence in the park, I don't have to come up with a new nickname for it (although when/if they do change the name, removing the "Studios" part from it, I probably will have to find a new nickname). My nickname does not refer to either Disney or MGM in particular; it is deliberately vague and can go any way.

reddit.com
u/MHarrington85 — 2 months ago

Armchair Imagineering: An update to the Enchanted Tiki Room (Disneyland only)

This is an idea I've had to improve the Enchanted Tiki Room at Disneyland, based on what happened with Walt Disney World's version, only better, since the one in Disneyland is better overall.

This is a change so slight that it's not otherwise noteworthy. This will add in some special effects from the post-2011 version at WDW. These effects occur near the end after the gods, angered by all the celebrating, unleash a storm that plunges the room into darkness briefly. In the Florida version, outside the windows, the storm clouds are very visible with occasional lightning flashes. Disneyland's version will not only receive these same effects, but will also improve on them. As the Tiki Room War Chant intensifies, you can spot the clouds from the coming storm already gathering outside the windows. By the time the chant reaches its crescendo, the clouds have completely blotted out the sky before the storm finally breaks. It's not much, but it does provide another layer to a beloved attraction.

reddit.com
u/MHarrington85 — 2 months ago