u/Mastermiine

I’ve been researching Italian citizenship by descent through a possible 1948 case and recently had a consultation with Aprigliano Law Firm.

Based on the records they reviewed, they believe there is a viable pathway through my great-grandmother’s line, although they made it clear there are no guarantees.

The quoted pricing I received was roughly:

* ~€6,600 for a solo applicant

* ~€7,950 for 2 applicants

* ~€11,850 for 4 applicants

plus court fees and possible additional document/translation costs.

From what I’ve researched so far, this seems to be within the normal range for a full-service 1948 case, but it is obviously still a major financial commitment.

Originally I thought more family members might participate, but when the per-person estimate landed around ~$3.5K USD each, my brothers immediately lost interest and said no. At this point I’m realistically evaluating whether this is something I would eventually pursue solo (or possibly with my father) once I’m financially stable again.

My main questions are:

* For those who pursued a 1948 case, what did you realistically pay all-in?

* Did unexpected costs come up beyond the original quote?

* What firms/lawyers did you use and would you recommend them?

* For those who pursued this solo, do you personally feel it was worth it?

* Has anyone regretted waiting too long before filing?

* How much concern do people have about future rule changes affecting eligibility?

Right now I’m trying to balance:

* the potential long-term value of EU citizenship,

* future opportunities for children/family,

* current financial realities,

* and uncertainty around possible future rule changes.

I’d appreciate hearing honest experiences from people who have actually gone through the process.

------------------------------------------------------------

EDIT / UPDATE:

Thank you everyone for the feedback so far. I really appreciate the perspectives and reality checks.

To clarify a few things:

• I have NOT committed to moving forward with the case yet.
• I absolutely plan to consult with additional firms/lawyers before making any decisions.
• I understand this appears to be a much more uncertain and evolving legal situation than I initially realized, especially with the recent changes people have mentioned.
• Part of why I made this post was to better understand the real-world risks, success rates, and total all-in costs beyond just the initial legal quote.

I also think part of my confusion right now is understanding exactly how the legal pathway is being structured.

From my understanding of what the lawyer explained, my direct line through my grandmother may be considered broken due to naturalization/minor-related issues. However, the firm believes there may still be a possible pathway through my great-grandmother’s line instead, because she allegedly maintained the uninterrupted bloodline through marriage/citizenship status.

The way it was explained to me sounded like:

• my father could potentially qualify through his grandmother,
• and then that recognition could potentially reopen or restore the chain for me afterward.

That said, after reading the comments here, I’m realizing there may be major uncertainty around whether courts will still recognize these types of reconstructed/workaround lines under the newer legal changes, which is why I definitely want multiple legal opinions before making any commitments.

Right now I’m mainly trying to understand:

• whether the case is actually viable under the current legal landscape,
• what realistic total costs look like after apostilles/translations/document work,
• how much of this depends on future legal challenges or changing interpretations,
• and whether this is realistically worth pursuing financially long-term.

The feedback about getting multiple opinions has been extremely helpful, and I’ll definitely be doing that before moving forward.

Trying to determine whether my Italian citizenship line was broken through my father’s mother’s side due to derivative U.S. citizenship through an American-born mother. This case involves pre-1948 / pre-1992 citizenship law and I’m hoping someone familiar with complex jure sanguinis cases may have insight.

Generation A (Great-Great-Grandparents)

• Born in Italy.
• Emigrated to the United States.
• Had a daughter born in Illinois in 1919.

Generation B (Great-Grandparents)

• Great-grandmother:
  • Born in Illinois in 1919 to Italian parents.
  • Later lived in Cefalù, Sicily.
  • Held an Italian ID card listing nationality as Italian.
• Great-grandfather:
  • Born in Italy in 1913.
  • Married great-grandmother in Italy in 1938.
  • Immigrated to the United States in 1947.
  • Naturalized in the United States in 1952.

Generation C (Grandmother)

• Born in Cefalù, Sicily in 1939 to Generation B.
• U.S. records later list her as “naturalized through mother.”
• Later registered to vote in California in 1966.
• I cannot find evidence she independently naturalized as an adult.

Generation D (My Parents)

• My father was born in the United States after Generation C was already living in America.

Important detail:
My great-grandmother appears to have simultaneously been recognized as:

• a U.S. citizen by birth, and
• an Italian citizen by Italian authorities.

My main question is:

Would Generation C’s derivative acquisition of U.S. citizenship through her American-born mother automatically have caused loss of Italian citizenship under the laws at that time?

Or is there still potentially a jure sanguinis argument because:

• the mother retained/was recognized as Italian,
• Generation C was born in Italy,
• and Generation C never appears to have independently naturalized as an adult?

I understand this may ultimately require an attorney or court interpretation, but I’m curious whether anyone has encountered a similar derivative-citizenship situation.