u/Medium-Theme-4611

For you guys that are analyzing the match ups: don't underestimate the buff American fighters will get by fighting at the White House. It will be very powerful motivation. Also, the intimidation foreign fighters will feel will be very strong. Historic American White House, US Army, the famous and wealthy, and it's Americas 250th birthday. Not to mention, foreign fighters' motivation will be sapped knowing no one in attendance wants them to win.

Another big factor, aside from the psych stuff is the heat. I strongly believe Lewis will lose. He's the bigger guy, much fatter and has an old man's cardio. When its 80-90 degrees you will see Lewis move more lazily and slowly than ever before in his career. His body won't be able to cool down fast enough and it will tax his cardio.

I think Alex Pereira (-113) wins pretty handedly. Everyone agrees Gane lost to Volkov — does anyone here think Volkov is better than Alex Pereira at striking? I certainly don't.

Next, Bo Nickal (-300). Bo is going to wrestle his ass off in this fight, in my opinion. I think he gets it done. I'd say 60/40 with the odds favoring Bo.

Topuria (-750) beats Gaethje very easily. Gaethje is getting quite old and only had knockouts early in his career. And he just got knocked out by Max not that long ago. However, that came off the back of them swingin' and bangin' to beat the buzzer. Topuria just does not fight like that. Topuria's technique will be way too much for Justin to handle.

I actually think Justin will try to wrestle (rare I know) just because he knows this is the first opponent on the feet he can't really contend equally with. If Justin wrestles, it will slow the fight until the 2-3rd round barring Topuria doesn't immediately put him away.

If I parlay that, it's doubling my money. Not bad.

I was looking for a video game I could have running in the background while I did work on my computer.

I remembered I played this game after beating Fallout 4 ages ago, so I loaded it up and made a new playthrough.

It was a bit disturbing to see that it was precisely the same as when I left it.

The vault location was.... the same. The scenery was the same. The rooms were the same. Everything was identical.

I had thought because this game had "seasons" and on-going support that it would be more robust. Now, I'm wondering where has the developers put their efforts into.

The worst part is the game punishes me for leaving the game open.

I started a new game and quickly had about 10 dwellers.

I would leave it in the background and I noticed that there were incidents occurring so frequently that it was preventing all my dwellers from ever being above 50% HP.

I left my computer to brush my teeth, came back and two of my vault dwellers were dead.

I responded to the fire, then went back to brush my teeth. Two more died in a NEW event.

Now, I am left with so few dwellers, the entire playthrough is ruined.

The only thing new I noticed was in a Vault-Tec lunchbox, I got a card for someone named "Ma June." Researching this I learned she's a character in the live action series (whooptie doo).

I really don't remember the game being this bland and un-fun years ago. I also don't know why there aren't different types of vaults, different aesthetics, joinable factions, NPCs from previous games (why only Fallout 4 and live-action).

Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I need to buy a DLC or maybe I didn't play long enough. I'm not sure. So far, this playthrough is done for and I'm not sure I'll make another one.

If anyone has any suggestions for alternative games. PLEASE let me know.

I understand from David McLachlan's videos that the PMP is mostly scenario based questions. But something about studying for scenario based questions bothers me.

Every other certificate I've studied for, I take the time to learn definitions, how to recite formulas or the sequential stuff like what's the output of this process for example.

With David McLachlan's videos and his course on Udemy, there is not a strong emphasis on this. I even peaked at Study Hall and didn't see any questions like this.

Should I bust my hump learning definitions, or just keep going with scenario based stuff? So far, I'm killing it on the scenario based questions, but I can't shake the feeling I'm under prepared for the exam regardless of that. If someone asked me define each word in the acronym "SWOT" it would stump me. If they gave me multiple choice I could 100% infer the correct answer.