Deciding between RF 70-200mm (2.8 Z) v RF 100-300 (2.8)
I currently have a awkward dilema, I have the opportunity to purchase the Canon RF 100-300 2.8, or save money and purchase the 70-200 Z. I am making a huge jump in telephoto lens, from having a RF-S 55-210.
I am using a Canon R6mkII, and am constantly in concert and sport photography. I could use the distance of the 300, but I want to see which one is the smarter option in the long run.
(EDIT):
I am currently using a Canon R6mk2, I used to have a Canon r100 (thats why I had a RF-S on a FF…)
Current lenses I own:
- Canon RF 50mm 1.8 IS STM
- Canon RF 24-105 f2.8 IS USM