r/canon

Hello! I'm looking for advice on whether or not I should get the Canon RF 85mm 2.0 Macro lens. I currently have the Canon R8 and 24-70mm f2.8 IS STM lens*. I like to take portraits of my dogs and I have been wondering if it is worth buying the 85mm 2.0 as well. How big of a difference would it make for these kinds of photos? I am worried about the slow autofocus, because dogs don't stay still.

*Updated the lens info*

https://preview.redd.it/g8y74agohh2h1.jpg?width=3923&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2ac9d30ffd62cbb7b4f73eb4daef66a50a560552

I am looking to get a 35mm for a 2-body setup (to pair with my 85) as I get more paid work.

I'm currently rocking the RF 28-70mm 2.8 on an R8 and RF 85mm 1.4 VCM on my R6 II.

I will be keeping my zoom lens and use it for a more run and gun events but I feel like I produce better composition and more creative shots with a prime. I started with an EF 50mm 1.8 (with adapter) so I am comfortable zooming with my feet.

So, I guess my question is, should I go for the more expensive 35 vcm or would the cheaper 35 1.8 be enough?

I am a hobbyist taking personal family photos and kids soccer photos. No desire to get paid. Just want to capture family moments.

Shooting with R6ii. For soccer, I use RF70-200 F4 and RF100-400 for more reach.

Aside from the added reach on RF100-400, I find the pictures on my RF70-200 to be much sharper.

So I’m considering a RF100-500 to get the added reach and sharper image.

Question - with the higher resolution of a R5ii, what’s the real difference between:

Using R6ii and RF100-500 (primarily in 100-400 range)

And using R5ii and RF70-200, but cropping in to match the 100-400 range)

I don’t need or necessarily want a new camera. But if the result is comparable, I may just get the higher resolution R5ii instead of a new lens.

Thanks.

Hi! I am a beginner bird watcher and recently I have been feeling like keeping a good record of all the birds that I see by taking their pictures. What (second-hand of course) camera would you suggest? The subreddit is very overwhelming to me and it seems like there are tons of options. I just want to play around with a second-hand, basic BUT good-enough camera for birds specifically (so I assume you need a good zoom and focus?) and then later on upgrade if I am still interested in the hobby. Also I should point out that I have no knowledge of photography. My balance is at max 300 euros but I'd prefer something from 100-250 euros. Thank you!!!

When I change lenses, it makes some kind of strange noise. Does anyone know what might be causing this?

Seriously not sure what I should do.

I’m a hobbyist and I shoot purely for the enjoyment. I’m not opposed to spending money on this hobby, but I’m trying to have somewhat of a loose strategy around my lens collection. Loose meaning ideally no overlap and compatibility.

I have 3 bodies, a 5D MkIV, a 7D MkII (that I rarely use anymore these days) and a R6 MkII (I originally picked up a Canon RP to try out Mirrorless and quickly realized the benefits and picked up the R6)

I mostly shoot with the 5D MkIV, I’m extremely comfortable and used to the classic DSLR experience, but I want to put some miles on my R6 and start getting the benefits from the newer cameras (autofocus, IBIS, shots per second, etc.)

I currently own the usual 3 lens combination: EF 16-35 f2.8L, EF 24-70 f2.8L II, and the EF 70-200 f2.8L IS II

I love that i can use these across my 5D and 7D, and I have the basic EF-RF adapter for the R6 MkII and everything works fine, no complaints. I can even use the same batteries across all 3 bodies. It’s fantastic.

I do not own any RF lenses because I don’t like the idea that I can’t use them on my EF bodies. But I feel like I’m equally missing out too on the improvements Canon has been making in their optics.

I have some travel coming up and my 24-70 is my go to with my 5D or R6 with adapter for travel, but everything I’m reading is that the RF version of the 24-105 f4L is an amazing lens for travel. I used to have the EF version of this lens but sold it along the way as I upgraded. And now I’m considering the RF version, but I am conflicted as I find more value in buying used EF lenses - but outside of super telephotos, there really isn’t much more that I need. (I’m not much of a prime shooter and prefer zooms).

Any thoughts on if I should bite the bullet and pickup the RF 24-105 or other? (What’s your favorite RF travel lens?) or stick with EF lenses? If so, what are the best/sharpest lens these days for the RF-EF adapters?

Pro’s for buying an RF lens is better optics over older EF lenses, less weight, and less bulk (no adapter). Cons: price, and can’t use on the 5D/7D. I fully anticipate getting used to the R6 and never looking back, but the 5D series holds a special spot for me.

I appreciate any input or advice!
Thanks!

I just acquired another prime lens for my R8: the RF 50 f1.4 VCM, as I didn’t have a 50mm prime in my collection. It’s the fastest lens I own and seemed a bit extravagant, but I need it for low light event work when even 1.8 struggles and I don’t like raising the ISO too high. It seemed like a good opportunity to test all of my RF lenses on a tripod to compare sharpness in Lightroom.

My current lens collection includes a mix of non-L and L glass: RF 24 1.8 Macro, RF 35 1.8 Macro, RF 50 1.4 L VCM, RF 85 f2 Macro, RF 100 2.8 L Macro, and RF 70-200 f4 L.

What surprised me is just how sharp all of this glass is, even the budget primes. I could not tell a difference between the 35 1.8 and 50 1.4 when compensated for distance to subject due to different focal lengths, at least when stopped down to 2.8. They are both tack sharp and the difference is imperceptible. The same could be said for the 70-200 f4 at 70mm compared to the 50 VCM. And the 85 f2 vs. the 100 f2.8.

I honestly think there’s no justification of buying L lenses for image quality alone. If you are shooting in low light, or shooting moving subjects, and have a particular need for f1.4 or f1.2, or need specialist features for a particular purpose like weather sealing or macro, then obviously you need the right tool for the job. The extra stops of light gathering of faster primes will be useful for low light as you will have less noise and cleaner photos, and they might be a tiny bit sharper when wide open, but stopped down there is no difference. And that’s pixel peeping on a MacBook screen at 100%.

I was tempted to get the RF 35 F1.4 VCM as well but I don’t think I’ll bother. The 1.8 is that good.

Just my thoughts.

I’ve been reading and hearing for years that Sony autofocus is technically incredible but can sometimes feel a bit “robotic” or overly aggressive, while Canon AF feels more natural, intuitive and “human” in the way it tracks subjects.

For those of you who have used both systems extensively for street photography, do you think there’s truth to that?

I shoot mostly street photography and sometimes shoot from the hip or chest level. I also use manual focus and zone focusing a lot, especially at f/8, but I still enjoy using autofocus in many situations — particularly when shooting at wider apertures like f/2 or f/2.8 where AF accuracy becomes critical and missed shots can ruin the image.

Some people claim Canon gives them a higher keeper rate because the AF behavior feels more predictable and less “nervous” than Sony, especially with people walking toward the camera or in busy scenes. Others say Sony’s AF is objectively superior and that any difference is just user adaptation.

For those who have real-world experience with both:

• Did you notice a meaningful difference in keeper rate?
• Does Canon really feel more intuitive for people/street photography?
• Is Sony better once properly configured?
• Which system do you trust more for fast candid shots at shallow depth of field?

I’d especially love to hear from people who shoot:

• street photography
• candid portraits
• hip shooting
• moving subjects at f/2-ish apertures

Thanks.

I shoot food / restaurant photography and I’m kind of over my 24-105 currently. It’s just not as sharp as I’m wanting anymore. What do you guys use or recommend in that zone? I’m open to one or two different lenses. Budget is around 1,200 max.

I've been lurking for awhile. I found out through the sub Canon has a Loyalty Program. I just got off the phone with them. I'm moving from an old SL1 to a R6ii with 24-105 f/4 L. Three to seven business days. So any thoughts on what else I should get? Memory cards, batteries (Canon or aftermarket). Oh, also picked up the 100-400 f/5.6-8. Not a pro or looking to be. Retired and most of my shots will be National Parks, Europe, Night Sky, Northern lights.

I loved our SL1, we bought it used and got some great shots with it. Granted, I might have had to work a little harder but we have plenty of pics hanging on our walls. I have a backpack and cleaning supplies. What can you guys not do without when you are out and about.

Again, thanks

Wish it was the regular edition at MSRP since I'm looking to get one for my kid, but they've been selling those for around $1300-$1400 too for some reason.