Although SPP has made countless attempts to save them, they always seem to be infinitely out of reach, trapped in the Metamathemagical realm.
I want to ask them: How can we save you? What will it take to convince you? Is there any hope?
Menschen mit Jobs, die schon vor Jahren hätten wegrationalisiert werden sollen, sind am lautesten, wenn es um KI-Hate geht. Ich bin Informatiker und stark davon betroffen, aber mit KI kann ich so schnell so krasses Zeug machen; es ist der Wahnsinn. Man muss nur mit der Zeit gehen und sich daran gewöhnen. Wer nicht mit der Zeit geht, geht mit der Zeit.
Die einzige Gefahr ist die Monopolbildung, aber es gibt Open-Source-Modelle, die sehr nah an die besten Modelle rankommen, die es derzeit gibt. Worst Case ist, wir müssen die KI-Zentren an uns reißen für das Allgemeinwohl. Best Case: Es bleibt gut verteilt und wir alle profitieren l.
This subreddit will always be funny to me. I made this video to capture the vibe. Enjoy!
In "Philosophie der Mathematik" by Murawski, the text references a survey by Ludwig Bauer asking whether 0.999... is less than 1 or equal to 1.
The data shows that 72.2% of high school students in grades 7 to 12 believe it is less than 1.
For math undergraduates after their third semester, 50% state it is less than 1.
In a separate count from a seminar of 51 students across all teaching degrees, 90.2% answered that it is less than 1.
Even among a small sample of 17 teachers and instructors, 47.1% decided it is less than 1.
Why do we enforce this standard interpretation on people when there are equally rigorous, non-standard mathematical frameworks that actually align with our natural intuition?
Hi everyone, I have been taking many of my books and turning them into podcast episodes, chapter by chapter, using Notebook LLM.
I thought this book might be especially interesting for some of you. Enjoy!
