u/No-Comment-8160

News is :- Investors seem to be rotating out of large caps and moving money into mid- and small-cap funds. However, despite this shift in allocation, overall equity mutual fund inflows have fallen by 15%, which suggests fresh money coming into equities has actually slowed.

So, does this mean that if the market falls now, the correction could be sharper rather than gradual, as the steady support from DIIs appears to be weakening?

Flows weakening → DII monthly inflows drying up → the cushion/support that was absorbing market declines is gradually getting weaker.

Is it ?

I have an MTF position in CG Power (500 shares). Around 3:28 PM, the stock was trading around ₹852, but the official closing auction price was ₹826.

That single auction move:
• Increased my unrealized loss by around ₹13,000+ within minutes.

• Forced me to add more margin to maintain my MTF position.

I understand that SEBI introduced CAS to reduce closing price manipulation, but from a retail investor's perspective, it feels like we've lost the ability to react to large end-of-day price changes.

There were days when this stock kept breaking every resistance level on its way to ₹8,000. And now? It’s been hitting the lower circuit for the last three consecutive days.

I entered TCS because it’s a Nifty 50 company, and I believed the global AI rally might eventually cool off once the earnings of major AI companies started reflecting reality.

As the stock kept falling, I averaged down aggressively to bring my cost closer to a realistic exit level around ₹2,400.

Yesterday, TCS finally reached my target and I exited. I was pretty happy with the trade.

Today, after seeing the stock drop back toward the ₹2,200 zone, I’m probably 100 times happier. It feels like I narrowly escaped getting trapped in a much deeper drawdown.

Now the bigger question is:

Is the golden era of Indian IT over, or is this just a temporary reset before the next growth cycle?

I’m trying to understand whether Pakistan’s decision to restore several street names in Lahore to their pre-Partition identities is being driven by international pressure from the US or EU, or whether it is part of a broader image-rebranding strategy.

For decades, Pakistan’s global reputation has often been shaped by associations with terrorism, extremism, and Islamic fundamentalism. Because of this, it seems possible that the state now wants to project a different image one rooted more deeply in the shared civilizational and cultural heritage of South Asia, similar to how neighbouring countries present themselves internationally.

Could this renaming effort be an attempt to reconnect with Lahore’s pre-Partition history and multicultural past in order to soften Pakistan’s international image? Or is it a calculated cultural and diplomatic move aimed at repositioning Pakistan as a historically rich South Asian nation rather than a country primarily viewed through the lens of security concerns and militancy?