u/No_Appeal_5223

TL;DR: With only one normal practice session before Sprint Qualifying, I think getting the setup right immediately could matter as much as outright pace at Zandvoort.

The Dutch GP looks particularly difficult to predict this year.

Zandvoort already puts a premium on qualifying position, confidence and track position. Adding the Sprint format means teams have much less time to correct a setup that starts the weekend outside the ideal window.

That makes me think the biggest advantage may go to whichever team arrives closest to the right setup from the first session.

The main factors I'm watching are:

• qualifying pace and track position
• who adapts fastest with limited practice
• tyre behaviour over longer runs
• weather and Safety Car timing
• how aggressively teams approach the Sprint

I don't think past Zandvoort results alone are enough to identify the favourite this time. A slightly slower package executed perfectly could potentially beat a faster car that spends half the weekend searching for balance.

Who are your top three for the Dutch GP, and what do you think will decide the race?

The Dutch GP feels unusually difficult to call this year.

Zandvoort already rewards confidence and a good qualifying position, but adding the Sprint format means teams have much less time to correct a setup that starts the weekend in the wrong window.

That’s why I’m not convinced past Zandvoort form alone tells us who should be favourite.

A driver or team that arrives immediately comfortable with the car could have a much bigger advantage than usual, while someone who needs several practice runs to find the right balance may be playing catch-up all weekend.

My main things to watch are:

• who gets the setup right immediately
• qualifying performance and track position
• tyre behaviour over the longer runs
• whether changing conditions create a strategy opportunity
• how aggressively teams approach the Sprint versus the Grand Prix

I put together a longer Dutch GP prediction and race analysis here:

My current feeling is that the winner may be decided as much by execution as outright pace.

Who is your pick for Zandvoort, and which team do you think benefits most from the Sprint format?

For a long time, my “AI workflow” was basically a mess of saved prompts, bookmarks, notes, screenshots and random documents.

I kept finding useful ideas, but when I actually needed to get something done, I still had to search through everything again.

So I tried a different approach: instead of collecting more prompts, I started turning the useful ones into small repeatable workflows.

For example:

• SEO content research → outline → first draft → editing checklist
• Competitor research → data collection → comparison → summary
• Landing page copy → positioning → headline ideas → CTA variations
• Content repurposing → long-form article → short posts → video ideas
• Business planning → research → assumptions → structured plan

Eventually I organized the workflows I was actually using into around 20 practical playbooks.

The biggest thing I learned is that the prompt itself usually isn't the valuable part.

The useful part is knowing:

what information to give the AI, what order to do things in, what needs human judgment, and how to check the final output.

A brilliant prompt without a process around it often just creates another piece of text you still have to figure out what to do with.

I'm curious how other people here work.

Do you keep a library of prompts, or have you started building repeatable AI workflows for specific tasks?

And if you had to turn one AI task you do repeatedly into a step-by-step workflow, what would it be?