Image 1 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
Image 2 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
Image 3 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
Image 4 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
Image 5 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
Image 6 — Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!
▲ 7 r/u_Otherwise-Secret-268+1 crossposts

Avant guard 1051 product failure. Eron Knox, Matthew James Kennedy STAY AWAY!

This is for the detailing community, particularly anyone thinking about putting their money, customers and reputation behind Avant Guard Formula 1051. I want to talk about my experience dealing directly with Eron “Knoxy” Knox and Matt Kennedy. This isn’t something I heard from another detailer or read online. I was there. I put my money behind this product and, more importantly, I put my reputation behind it.
By the time I left SEMA in Las Vegas on November 7, 2025, I was still sitting on approximately 500 kits that we had been told were not working properly. This was a massive concern because Avant Guard was coming to Australia for our national Formula 1051 training tour, beginning November 18.
I repeatedly raised my concerns with Matt and Knoxy before leaving Las Vegas. I wanted to know whether the product was actually ready and whether Australia was covered. I was repeatedly reassured that they had it handled and not to worry. I trusted them.
Eleven days later, our first training session was scheduled for 9am on the Gold Coast, with around 20 detailers waiting at my shop. Matt and Knoxy flew into Brisbane at approximately 8am that morning carrying around 40 kits in their luggage — roughly an hour’s drive away from a training session starting an hour later.
Then their luggage was lost.
They arrived and told me we had no product to train with. Fortunately, another approximately 40 kits had been express-shipped to Australia. I’d managed to divert that shipment and have it urgently redirected to our shop. We started training around an hour late, thinking we’d managed to save the situation.
Then we got the call: don’t use those 40 kits — they’re faulty.
I’d left SEMA eleven days earlier with around 500 kits already causing concern, been assured Australia was covered, and now the replacement product at the first session of our national training tour couldn’t be used either.
What happened next is the part that has stayed with me. My recollection is that Matt and Knoxy proposed using rental cars for the training so the detailers wouldn’t subsequently see how the coating cured and how bad the finished result was.
I went along with it, and I take responsibility for that decision. I had around 20 detailers standing there who had trusted me, some having rearranged their businesses and travelled to attend. I didn’t want to let them down, and I was still believing the assurances that these problems were going to be fixed.
Looking back, I should have stopped the training and told everyone exactly what was happening. I didn’t. To the detailers who trusted me because of my involvement with Formula 1051, I’m sorry. I should have acted on what I was seeing instead of continuing to rely on assurances.
Unfortunately, that wasn’t the end of it.
By January 2026, I had received approximately 1,540 Formula 1051 kits. In my experience, different batches presented different problems, including solvent pop, coatings remaining sticky, rainbowing and other application and curing issues. I wasn’t comfortable putting what I was seeing onto a paying customer’s vehicle.
Then, after SEMA, the Australian training situation and the issues we’d experienced across those batches, I was asked in January to reload another 1,000 kits to maintain my exclusivity.
That’s the part I still struggle to understand. I had already received approximately 1,540 kits and was dealing with multiple issues across batches, yet the conversation had come back to committing to another thousand kits.
This is a major reason I’m speaking publicly about my experience with Eron “Knoxy” Knox. Avant Guard publicly identifies Knoxy as its Head of Product Development, and Formula 1051 has been marketed as the result of 1,051 rounds of testing and refinement.
So there are questions I believe deserve answers. If the product had undergone that level of testing and refinement, why was I experiencing these problems across different batches? Why did I leave SEMA with hundreds of kits already causing concern and then get reassured that Australia was covered? Why did the people responsible for the training arrive on the morning of the first session carrying the training product in their luggage, only for the replacement kits we’d managed to secure to be declared faulty?
And most importantly, why, according to my recollection, was the proposed solution to use rental cars so the detailers wouldn’t later see how those vehicles looked after the coating cured? Then, after everything that had happened, why was I being asked in January to commit to another 1,000 kits to maintain exclusivity?
Matt Kennedy and Eron Knox are entitled to give their version of these events, and I invite them to.
I’m not asking anyone to blindly believe me. I’m putting my experience on the record. Do your own due diligence. Research the company and the people involved, read the product claims, test products independently, and keep your messages, emails, invoices, batch numbers and agreements.
The biggest lesson I took from this is simple: don’t let somebody else’s confidence override what you’re seeing with your own eyes. If I’m putting a coating on somebody else’s vehicle, I need to be confident I can stand behind the result.
With the Formula 1051 batches I had received, I couldn’t. I should have acted on that sooner. I won’t make that mistake again.

u/Otherwise-Secret-268 — 8 days ago
▲ 8 r/AutoPaint+2 crossposts

Avant Guard 1051 Review Our Experience With Faulty Kits, Product Failures Solvent Pop financial loss

I’m writing this because anyone searching for Avant Guard 1051 reviews, Avant Guard coating reviews, Avant Guard 1051 problems, Avant Guard product issues or information about Avant Guard paint protection deserves to hear experiences from businesses and installers who have actually purchased and used the product.
This is my experience as the former Australian distributor of Avant Guard 1051.
We invested AUD $318,000 into Avant Guard and purchased 1,000 kits.
What followed became one of the most expensive and frustrating product experiences our business has dealt with.
The first 500 kits
The first 500 kits we received were faulty.
Initially, we tried to work through the problems. We had a significant amount of money invested and wanted the product and distribution arrangement to succeed.
We tested processes, worked with installers and spent considerable time trying to determine what was going wrong.
This wasn’t simply one inexperienced installer struggling with a new coating.
We had a network of 50+ installers, and problems were being experienced across the network.
The second 500 kits
The second 500 kits were also faulty.
At this point, we had now received the entire 1,000 kits originally purchased for AUD $318,000, and in our experience both batches had significant problems.
We continued trying to resolve the situation rather than immediately walking away.
Another 40 kits
We subsequently received approximately 40 additional kits.
Those were also faulty in our experience.
That meant we had now dealt with approximately 1,040 kits across multiple shipments that we considered faulty.
This is important because this wasn’t one isolated shipment, one installer, one vehicle or one bad day of application.
We were experiencing problems across multiple shipments and a large installer network.
The final 500 kits
We then received another approximately 500 kits.
These were finally usable, but that still didn’t mean the problems disappeared.
In our experience, these kits suffered from solvent-pop and haze issues, creating further difficulties for installers trying to achieve the finish customers expected.
By this stage, approximately 1,540 kits had passed through our operation while we were attempting to get the Avant Guard 1051 system working reliably.
We had more than 50 installers involved
One of the most important parts of this story is that this wasn’t simply me installing the product incorrectly.
Our Australian network involved more than 50 installers.
When problems initially appeared, we spent months troubleshooting because we genuinely wanted to believe there was a solution.
Processes were changed.
Installation techniques were reviewed.
Different approaches were tested.
Vehicles were inspected and rectified.
More product was tried.
We invested enormous amounts of time trying to make it work.
Then I started talking to overseas installers
During this period, I began independently contacting Avant Guard installers outside Australia.
This changed my perspective considerably.
I spoke with installers in the United States and South America who described their own negative experiences with the product.
One installer I spoke with in Colombia told me other installers around him had abandoned the product because of issues and he was one of the remaining installers. He later stopped using it as well.
The more people I spoke with, the harder it became for me to accept that what we were experiencing was simply an isolated Australian installation problem.
The financial damage
The original payment for the product was:
AUD $318,000
We have separately calculated approximately:
AUD $98,800 in documented additional losses.
That loss sheet is deliberately conservative.
It does not, in my opinion, come close to representing the complete economic impact when you consider the enormous amount of time spent troubleshooting, labour, cash expenditure, vehicle rectification, lost productivity and other consequences.
I believe the real additional economic impact is well over AUD $300,000 when everything is considered.
However, I’m using the conservative documented figure here because I want the numbers in this post to be clear.
Using those documented figures:
Original product payment: AUD $318,000
Documented additional losses: AUD $98,800
Documented total: AUD $416,800
Avant Guard subsequently refunded us:
USD $100,000
Using an AUD equivalent of approximately $141,502, that leaves our claimed documented balance at:
AUD $275,298
Again, that calculation uses the conservative documented losses rather than what I believe the true overall economic damage has been.
The warranty and rectification problem
Avant Guard 1051 was promoted with a 10-year warranty.
When you’re selling a protection product carrying a long warranty, the real test isn’t simply how good the marketing looks.
The real test is what happens when something goes wrong.
We had customers whose vehicles needed attention and a network of installers relying on us.
Regardless of what was happening behind the scenes, those customers were dealing with our businesses and our installers.
That meant we had to deal with the consequences.
Our reputation was on the line.
Our installers’ reputations were on the line.
And substantial amounts of time and money went into trying to rectify the situation.
Why we kept trying
Some people might reasonably ask:
Why keep using it if you were having so many problems?
Because we had invested $318,000.
You don’t make an investment of that size and throw everything away after the first difficulty.
We wanted Avant Guard 1051 to work.
We wanted the Australian distribution business to succeed.
We wanted our installers to succeed with it.
So we kept troubleshooting.
We kept testing.
We kept communicating.
We kept trying replacement product.
We kept trying to find solutions.
Eventually there comes a point where you have to stop asking how to make something work and start asking how much more money and time you’re prepared to lose trying.
What I would tell another installer considering Avant Guard 1051
Do your own independent due diligence.
Don’t base a major purchasing decision purely on promotional videos, demonstrations or information supplied by the company selling you the product.
Find former installers, not just current installers.
Find former distributors.
Ask them why they stopped.
Ask how many warranty claims they experienced.
Ask what happens when the coating needs to be removed.
Ask who pays the labour for rectification.
Ask who pays when a customer’s vehicle needs to come back.
Ask whether replacement product actually solved their problems.
Ask about hazing.
Ask about solvent pop.
Ask what happens to your inventory if your relationship with the supplier ends.
Ask exactly how the advertised warranty operates when there is a real-world failure.
And get important representations in writing.
Why I’m making this public
I’m sharing this because I wish information like this had been available when we were making our investment decision.
This represents my experience, our business records, our installer network’s experience and information communicated to me during the period we distributed the product.
I have retained extensive documentation relating to our dealings, including invoices, communications, product records, installer feedback, loss calculations, product issues, rectification expenses and refund discussions.
I’m not asking anyone reading this to blindly take my side.
Do your own research.
Speak to people who have actually installed the product.
Speak to former installers as well as successful current installers and make your own decision.
I also want to hear from other Avant Guard installers
If you’re a current or former Avant Guard 1051 installer, distributor or customer, I’d genuinely like to hear about your experience.
Good or bad.
Did Avant Guard 1051 work reliably for you?
Did you experience haze or solvent-pop issues?
Did you experience coating or installation failures?
Were warranty claims handled successfully?
Did you stop installing the product? If so, why?
If you had a problem, what happened when you contacted Avant Guard?
The more genuine installer experiences that are documented publicly, the easier it becomes for another detailing business to make an informed decision before investing significant money.
Hopefully this thread becomes a useful independent resource for anyone searching for:
Avant Guard 1051 reviews
Avant Guard reviews
Avant Guard coating reviews
Avant Guard 1051 problems
Avant Guard 1051 product issues
Avant Guard coating problems
Avant Guard 1051 solvent pop
Avant Guard 1051 haze
Avant Guard paint protection reviews
Avant Guard 1051 warranty problems
When businesses are being asked to put substantial money, their reputation and their customers’ vehicles behind a product, they deserve to be able to find both the positive experiences and the negative ones before making that decision.

u/Otherwise-Secret-268 — 2 months ago

Avant Guard 1051 fails do not trust this company

Avant guard 1051 is the worst product ever released into the automotive industry. The company is run by a guy named Matt Kennedy he is a flat out scam artist do not let him fool you. Their product has caused hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of damage to cars. When you approach them about their 10 year warranty they will tell you to go jump and block you from correspondence. See more info at the Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/share/g/1FLd4FMgep/?mibextid=wwXIfr

u/Otherwise-Secret-268 — 2 months ago