u/Perfect_Lake_6630

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

Recently, I posted about how social media influencers are increasingly normalizing nudity and highly revealing content. Many Redditors responded by saying it's just my algorithm and that people's choices shouldn't be questioned. My point, however, isn't about policing individual choices—it's about discussing the broader cultural influence that influencers have on young audiences and whether that influence deserves scrutiny.

Reducing this issue to "it's just your algorithm" misses the broader point. Algorithms don't create trends out of nothing, they amplify content that receives high engagement. If revealing content consistently performs well across platforms, that's evidence of a wider social trend, not just an individual's feed.

My concern isn't about policing what adults choose to wear. It's about the cultural influence of social media. Influencers shape fashion, beauty standards, consumer habits, and even political opinions. So why is it unreasonable to say they also influence young people's attitudes toward modesty, sexuality, and self-worth?

If a large number of young girls see that revealing more of their body brings more likes, followers, brand deals, and attention, it's natural that some will try to imitate that model of success. Likewise, when young men are constantly rewarded (sexual gratification) for consuming and engaging with such content, it reinforces a cycle of objectification. Both sides contribute to that loop.

Saying "it's just your algorithm" avoids the real question: What kind of values are we normalizing for the next generation? Freedom of choice and social influence can both exist at the same time. Acknowledging one doesn't erase the other.

And personally, I still believe the most attractive people are those whose confidence, character, and abilities speak louder than how much skin they reveal.

And I know those people will not give me a valid logical counter argument but will call me an uncle, Your generation is horny and hypocrite and blah blah!

What's GRWM? Back in our time, we used to call it MMS.

It feels like Gen Z and Gen Alpha have normalized revealing content to the point where modesty seems overlooked. People should carry themselves with a sense of decency and self-respect.

How do thin panties or revealing clothes make people comfortable? I don't buy the argument when they say it's for their comfort and not for attention. Seriously, wearing and revealing a thin, transparent panty under shorts can never be about comfort unless they're seeking attention.

To me, the most attractive people aren't those who rely on nudity or revealing clothing for attention.

Are Nepalese/gorkhas indigenous to assam? If not then why are they interfering in other states matter not only in assam but also in arunachal matters. For those who don't know the context, let me explain what's happening in Arunachal Pradesh.

1. We are demanding the strict implementation and regulation of the Inner Line Permit (ILP), which exists under the constitutional framework to protect the identity, culture, and interests of the indigenous tribal communities of Arunachal Pradesh.

2. We oppose the granting of Permanent Resident Certificates (PRC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) status to non-indigenous people, as these protections are meant for the indigenous tribes of the state.

3. We believe that voting rights should not be exercised in multiple constituencies. A person should choose one constituency—either in their home state or in Arunachal Pradesh. This is because the misuse of voter registration can influence local politics, and we believe the people of Arunachal should decide their own leadership. At the same time, we also understand that many non-tribal residents are here for work or business and may face difficult situations.

4. Recently, some individuals and groups identifying as Gorkhas, particularly from outside Arunachal Pradesh, including parts of Assam, have publicly attempted to interfere in matters concerning our state. Some have even made threatening remarks about entering Arunachal. They are also opposing demands that many people in Arunachal consider to be rights and protections provided under the Constitution. Such statements and interference are unacceptable. Decisions regarding Arunachal Pradesh should be made through lawful and democratic processes by the appropriate authorities and the people of the state.

This is not about hatred toward any community. It is about protecting the constitutional rights, indigenous identity, and democratic interests of Arunachal Pradesh while respecting the law and maintaining peace.