u/PokerMenYTP

I sincerely apologize for the quality; the image is very large and I created it in Google Docs. Access the link here to view the original file, where the quality is vastly superior

1 - Monstro do Lago Ness;
2 - Lesson’s Little Dolphin;
3 - Long-Necked Seal;
4 - Delphinus Albigena;
5 - Dimorphic Beaked Whale;
6 - Corfu Island Creature;
7 - Alula Whale;
8 - Greek Dolphin;
9 - Holadeira (Sawtooth Dolphin);
10 - Cornish Two-Finned Dolphin;
11 - Illigan Dolphin;
12 - Steller’s Sea Cow;
13 - Hook Island Monster;
14 - Ndendecki;
15 - Senegal Dolphin;
16 - Deepstar 4000 Fish;
17 - Rhinoceros Dolphin;
18 - Lau;
19 - Giant Atlantic Grenadier;
20 - Cleary’s Fish;
21 - 52 Hertz Whale;
22 - Trunko;
23 - Giant Goblin-Shark
24 - Giglioli’s Whale;
25 - Giant Jellyfish;
26 - Giant Dragonfish;
27 - Three-Starred Anglerfish;
28 - five-Striped Constellation Fish;
29 - Pallid Sailfin;
30 - Abyssal Rainbow Gar;
31 - Lusca;
32 - High-Finned Sperm Whale;
33 - Con Rit;
34 - Cadborosaurus (Candy);
35 - Southern Narwhal;
36 - Champ;
37 - Giant Sleeper Shark;
38 - Captain Hanna’s Fish;
39 - Orcinus Glacialis;
40 - Stronsay Beast;
41 - Antarctic Godzilla;
42 - Many-Finned Sea Serpent;
43 - Antarctic Long-Finned Whale;
44 - Super-Otter (Sea Serpent);
45 - Mahamba;
46 - Memphre;
47 - Bloop.

Hello, it’s me again—the person who conducted the investigation into the famous photo of the giant Sucurijú(allegedly 40 meters long). I confirmed that the photograph dates back to the 1930s—specifically, no earlier than 1937—after finding it in a book titled "Amazonia: Rio Juruá", published that year.

I also looked into the other photograph—the one showing a Sucurijú said to be 35 meters long, with its head and tail submerged in the water (see here). Unfortunately, I didn't find much, other than the fact that two newspapers from widely separated Brazilian states reported the sighting—and published the photo—on the same day (June 17, 1949). However, I frequently came across accounts of an alleged 40-meter Sucurijú attacking the Tabatinga Fort; although I didn't focus on that aspect—since I was searching for the photo itself—I eventually discovered a news story in the Rio de Janeiro newspaper *A Noite*, dated March 5, 1951, which featured that photograph alongside the following article:

"HE GRABBED HER ALIVE!"

"And he came to offer it to the Zoo. It's over eight meters long, the enormous anaconda - It traveled by oxcart, launch, train and truck: - Unexpected arrival on a painter's excursion."

"The Zoo has just received another remarkable guest, a respectable sucurijú, measuring over eight meters in length and weighing 150 kilograms."

"The large snake was captured on the banks of the Brilhante River, a tributary of the Ivinheima River, by a painter seeking adventure who, departing from the city of Assis, in São Paulo, where he resides, had ventured into the Mato Grosso jungle."

"About thirty days ago, Mr. Paulo da Silveira—the fortunate and fearless hunter—encountered the fearsome reptile, which belongs to one of the best-known species and often reaches even more massive proportions"

so it continues on the next page:

"and living both on land and in the water."

"Generally, the snakes belong to the anaconda family, some of whose species are not venomous, they make their nests in burrows dug on the banks of rivers, with entrances below the waterline. They like, therefore, to go ashore where they hunt their food and take good naps curled up in the sun, giving the impression of a bundle of coiled ropes."

"Speaking to A Noite shortly after the snake’s arrival at the Zoo, Mr. Paulo da Silveira explained that for over four years he has made periodic trips to Mato Grosso, venturing into that state’s forests and wetlands on hunting expeditions and excursions. It was during one of these treks through the forest that he encountered the sucuriju, which—as he formally stated—he captured with his own hands. He named it "Tapajós" and crated it for the long journey here, a trip that involved a succession of transport methods: ox-cart, motorboat, train, and finally, truck."

""Tapajós," that formidable giant snake, has now fully settled into her transfer from the wilds of Mato Grosso to the Quinta da Boa Vista. Calm—and, one might say, almost civilized—she allows herself to be handled without agitation or significant resistance, not only by her captor but also by Mr. José Simplicio de Miranda, the Zoo’s Head of Maintenance. With great willingness—and even a certain perfectly photogenic flair—she readily posed for the A Noite camera, acting like a distinguished sucurijú who knows her own worth and appreciates the courtesies shown to the press."

(For some reason, the entire excerpt from the second page is repeated on page 24 of the same day's edition of the same newspaper.)

This page appeared in an article about animals supposedly discovered by Marc Van Roosmalen, but I cannot find this page on his website anywhere. I ask because, in addition to the giant paca, orange coati, and *onça-canguçú* skull, the image apparently shows other species he reported.

https://icebergthreads.com/pt/iceberg/OiT4zUYgzenGiNQLgpzI

The first one contains no information, and the second is dated 2018; I found it here

So, I was organizing and adding photos to an evidence drive I created, and while adding the Yagi Japanese Wolf photos, I stumbled upon a subreddit post sharing the video "Inside of Japan There Were Two Wolves." I found the video thumbnail a bit odd because one of the famous Yagi photos looked different. Watching the video, I noticed a discrepancy at the 9:08 mark—specifically regarding the most famous shot (the wolf on the small hill beneath a sign, looking toward Yagi), where the wolf's head is turned slightly to the side. Later, at the 9:58 mark, they show four more heavily zoomed-in photos; the top two are familiar, but the bottom two don't match any of the other 15 known images. I thought about using Google Lens on them to find the original, un-zoomed versions. When I ran a search on the photo where the wolf's head is turned, I came across a Japan Times video discussing the cryptid that features an interview with Hiroshi Yagi; its thumbnail uses that same photo of the wolf under the sign. That’s when I realized what made them look so different: the iron signpost behind the wolf isn't in the same position in every photo. This led me to consider two possibilities: either they are different photos, or—more plausibly—the video I was watching used AI to upscale the images, distorting the ones we know and making them look different from the originals. This is evident in the wolf's body pose, which is IDENTICAL across all three photos; if the animal had actually moved, I’d expect the pose to look at least slightly different. But that wouldn't apply to The Japan Times video's thumbnail, since the video was posted in 2021—a time when this whole AI thing didn't even exist, or if it did, it was back when it generated images with five arms and 37 fingers. So, I highly doubt it's AI, though maybe it's just my crazy imagination—what do you guys think?

A uns meses, um usuário do subreddit r/cryptozoology postou uma foto e um vídeo de dois supostos Musaranhos-de-Sonnerat, avistado apenas uma vez em 1813 na região de Pondicherry, na Índia e nunca mais foi relatado. Ele mencionou que descobriu um perfil de jardinagem de Luzon, Filipinas, que possuia evidencias em fotos e vídeos da existência dessa suposta espécie, ele não divulgou o perfil para evitar invasão de privacidade, e também ele não recebeu sinal verde para divulga-lo. Existe um artigo em um blog comentando sobre este caso, pesquise "Musaranho-de-Sonnerat (re)descoberto?" que você encontra muitas coisas envolvendo o animal. A questão se alguém poderia ajudar a tentar identificar, pois é extremamente comum mudanças genéticas com ratos fazerem eles terem a mesma coloração do suposto Musaranho-de-Sonnerat.

​

Peço mil perdões se não é permitido identificação de SUPOSTOS animais