u/Powerful-Gold-7170

Does it still do that? I remember it did but I can't seem to find anything about it after it made the game get flagged with "in game purchases and micro transactions"

I have a theory that needs to tie into that but i can't find any evidance that the screen exists anymore.

Any and all help is appreciated 👍

Does it still do that? I remember it did but I can't seem to find anything about it after it made the game get flagged with "in game purchases and micro transactions"

I have a theory that needs to tie into that but i can't find any evidance that the screen exists anymore.

Any and all help is appreciated 👍

I mean, it makes sense for the image generative ai's, don't get me wrong.
but normal text based ai?

...

well call me a narcisist but i really don't see the reason to ban it!

i mean yeah sure "not all technology is good", but like... everyone who drank water has died, you know? so does that mean water is bad? the statement doesn't make a good point here. it's really just a excuse for people who hate something for the sake of it or because it is how their perseption is created by interactive media (this is me saying that the internet can give us a idea on stuff we have no real opinion about and make us defend it cause it sounds right but we really don't know what we're doing)

so, when looking at it in highsight... it sounds pretty dumb of us trying to ban ALL ai?

cause like don't get me wrong ban image generative ai by ALL means. but text based ones?
...
well i think we should keep them?

cause REALLY, when you think about it in highnsight: trying to ban ChatGPT sounds pretty in-efficent when you think about it.

"it makes us dumber" anything can make a person dumber, it's called intellegance for a reason.

"it creates lazyness" we are the only species that didn't want to get up to chance the channel on a tv so we just straight up invented a new wave of light. lazyness is built into us, like how Tetris came bundled in with each purcase of a Gameboy.

"it makes illegal stuff easyer to acsess!" the contents of the entire interactive media that is made by human and all other else is in the palm of your hands or somewhere close, and im not just refering to the normal internet here. cp is broadly streamed in dark web, now call me crazy but im pretty sure it wasn't Claude who did that.

"ai can spread misinformation!" the history of entire humanity, including wars, battles, murder sprees and hoaxs alike have misinformation in them. it's not exactly new, just like iphone: it just comes back in another shape or form.

"it can hulicinate!" throw yourself in a desert with no water and see if you keep a straight sight. asking something that has no basic idea on what you're talking about is always going to end up bad, even if it doesn't esclate. please stop asking Thomas to do the electrical work on a nuclear plant, please, im begging you.

"students cheat on essays!" wikipedia. . . i don't think i need to explain myself here.

"it can be used to trick ther people!" i can use a knife to kill someone. is the knife guilty since it allowed the crime to happen, or am I guilty cause i used something that was created to make food for something outisde of it's created and intended purpose?

now, again: image generative ai can go to hell, trust me i hate those things with my whole heart and soul. they are trained on a person's art, while text based ai is used on just text prompts, you're not exactly stealing something. and i don't mean that in a sense of "if you sent it into the internet than it's public domain and everyone can use it" no. i mean it in a sense that text is made out of 26+ symbols, while art is made with a style, passion, color choice. they aren't the same, not by a long shot.

but normal text based ai is not that much different than just a piece of technology. you shove something in it and it shoves it back in but more gentler, more useful. (my phrasing is offensive but you get the idea)

so, again. i ask: why are we trying to ban ALL ai?