The hot guy at the shop next to the bakery — is he into me or am I delusional? 😭”

I couldn't think of a title, so here it goes.

I'm a gay guy from Karachi, and I currently go to a place—not regularly, but often enough. There's a bakery behind it where I usually wait to get a bike ride through the apps. Now, there's this hot guy across the street, probably the shopkeeper, who seems to be in his 20s. He looks older than me, but still young. He often stares at me, and whenever I get there, he's usually sitting in his chair inside the shop. But the moment he sees me, he gets closer to the glass door or comes outside and just looks at me, sometimes pretending to be on his phone.

I do the same thing. I sit on the bike across the street (it's not my bike, btw 😭). Today, I deliberately stood across the street again. This time, he didn't come outside, but I know he got up from his chair and stood next to the glass door, looking at me. I looked back at him but immediately looked away and pretended I was on a call or scrolling through my phone.

Also, I was wearing a black shirt and black trousers—the kind of outfit I usually wear to the gym. I'm not built or anything, though 😭.

Like, in an ideal world—not Pakistan—I would just go into the shop and see where things go. But damn, he was so hot and exactly my type, which is rare for me to find IRL. And he seems to show some interest in me too, although I don't know if I'm just making it all up in my head.

I've never dated a guy before or had a hookup, so I don't really know how to read these things.

I don't even know why I'm writing this confession. I kept it vague to protect my identity, so sorry about that. I know this might come across as creepy from my side, but his attention was definitely welcome.

This doesn't usually happen to me. Well, it happens, but this time I actually liked the guy back, and he seemed to show interest too. On the ride home, I was literally daydreaming about him. Ahhh. 😭

And when my ride finally came, I just left without even trying to get a second glimpse of him or looking back. Now I'm sitting here wondering why the hell I didn't. 😭

I felt like I needed to talk to someone about this, so here you go. Tea. ☕️

reddit.com
u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 2 days ago
▲ 56 r/GenZpk

People would still be defending these blaspheme laws..

The Supreme Court has acquitted three individuals who had been sentenced to death in a 2014 case in which a Christian couple was burned alive in a brick kiln in Kasur’s Kot Radha Kishan over blasphemy allegations.

The court overturned the death sentences of the three men and acquitted them after giving them the “benefit of doubt”, the 26-page judgement said. The court also rejected a state appeal against the acquittal of 102 other individuals in the case.

The appeals were taken up by a three-judge bench led by Justice Shahzad Ahmad Khan and comprising Justices Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Justice Shakeel Ahmed.

u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 3 days ago
▲ 27 r/GenZpk

Why Pakistan’s Sharia Morality Laws Are a Rapist’s Best Friend: The Invisible Link Between the Rape Epidemic and Illegal Consensual Sex.

We talk all the time about the horrific rape epidemic in Pakistan, but we rarely dig into the exact legal machinery that makes it impossible to fix. People point to police corruption or culture, but the core issue is structural. Our legal system applies a 1,500 year old evidentiary standard to modern crimes, effectively turning the victim’s own body into state certified evidence of their own guilt.

The numbers are damning. In Pakistan, the conviction rate for rape sits at an abysmal 1 percent to 3 percent. Meanwhile, the estimated percentage of sexual assault cases that go completely unreported is somewhere between 70 percent and 90 percent. Why? Because filing a rape report in Pakistan is treated by the system as a confession to a crime.

The Math of Impunity: The 4 Witness Rule
This crisis traces back to 1979, when the military dictatorship of Zia-ul-Haq passed the Hudood Ordinances. Under this framework, rape (Zina-bil-jabr) and consensual sex outside of marriage (Zina) were shoved into the exact same legal category. To convict a rapist under the traditional maximum penalty (Hadd), the prosecution is required to produce four adult, Muslim, male eyewitnesses who literally watched the act of penetration occur. Think about the sheer, twisted logic of that. Rape does not happen in front of an audience. Because finding four male eyewitnesses to a sexual assault is practically impossible, almost every single Hadd rape case fails.

When an Accusation Becomes a Confession: The Safia Bibi Case
But the law didn't just let the rapist go free; it actively hunted the victim. Under the Zina laws, if a victim came forward and stated, "This man had sex with me against my will," but failed to produce those four male witnesses, the court flipped the script. The system essentially reasoned: "You just admitted that sexual intercourse took place, but you have zero witnesses to prove it was forced. Therefore, you just confessed to having illegal sex outside of wedlock."

This resulted in shocking legal precedents of extreme injustice. In the infamous Safia Bibi case (1982 to 1983) in Sahiwal, a nearly blind teenage girl working as a domestic helper was raped by her landlord and his son. She became pregnant from the assault. Because she was completely unable to produce four adult male eyewitnesses to visually identify the perpetrators, the courts acquitted both rapists on the exact same day. Instead of receiving justice, Safia Bibi was tried for Zina (fornication) because her pregnancy was used by the court as a confession to extramarital sex. She was sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment, a financial fine, and 15 public lashings. While a massive wave of public protests by groups like the Women’s Action Forum and international embarrassment eventually forced the Federal Shariat Court to acquit her on technical grounds, she had already served six months in jail and suffered the trauma of state sponsored punishment. Before the Hudood laws, there were roughly 70 women in Pakistani prisons nationwide. Within less than a decade of this law being active, that number skyrocketed to over 6,000 women jailed. The vast majority of these inmates were working class women and domestic workers who had originally tried to report rape or were falsely accused by vengeful family members.

The Death Penalty Trap for Boys and Children
This Draconian system didn't just destroy women; it entirely erased male and child victims. Because the archaic definition of Zina was explicitly framed around heterosexual extramarital intercourse, the legal system lacked a proper framework for the sexual abuse of young boys. Predators exploiting children through underground practices like bacha bazi or predatory abuse in local institutions knew they were entirely safe. If a young boy or his family dared to report the abuse without four adult male witnesses, the system turned on them with even greater violence. Under section 377 of the Pakistan Penal Code, which criminalizes same sex intimacy, failing to prove that a sexual assault was forced transforms the report into an admission of unnatural offenses. As a result, a young boy or his family making a rape accusation without impossible eyewitness proof could find the victim or the accuser suddenly subjected to life imprisonment or the death penalty. The legal system effectively engineered a trap where reporting the rape of a boy could get the child executed or jailed for life, making total silence the only option for survival.

The Modern Reality: How Morality Laws Facilitate Rape
Activists fought for decades, leading to the Protection of Women Act of 2006, which technically moved rape out of the Hudood Ordinance and back into the civil Penal Code to remove the four witness requirement for standard trials. But you cannot undo decades of systemic judicial training with a piece of paper. The residual impact is everywhere.

Defense lawyers in Pakistani courts routinely downgrade a rape charge to a Zina charge. If the rapist can convince a judge that the victim knew them, talked to them, or consented at any point, the charge drops from a death sentence or 25 years in prison to a minor 5 year fornication charge. The system rewards rapists by allowing them to use morality laws to get less harsh sentences.

Furthermore, because sex outside of marriage remains illegal, defense teams spend the entire trial tearing down the victim's moral character. If a court decides a victim is of easy virtue, her entire testimony is thrown out. Victims don't just fear the judge; they fear the community. An accusation of Zina carries such a heavy social taboo that families will actively honor kill or violently attack a victim just to erase the shame of the allegation before a court even hears it.

Pakistan’s rape epidemic is a direct symptom of a state that is obsessed with policing private morality. Laws against consensual sex, whether same sex or opposite sex, do not protect morality. They systematically facilitate rape, weaponize the legal system against victims, protect predators with lighter sentences, and force victims into absolute silence. How do we even begin to dismantle a crisis when the very act of demanding legal reform is branded by society as an attack on religion?

reddit.com
u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 3 days ago

Help! Newbie here. How do I get rid of these huge transport ships? pls read the description and check out the pictures. I'm UK.

Hi, I just started playing supremacy. I used to play call of war a few years ago and Algeria an AI led country attacked me out of nowhere. Now his units of 600 or 500 manpower 3 or 4 of them are going into the sea and idk where they are headed to. I have cruiser but they can easily be destroyed by these transport ships so I'm just trying to follow them and bomb them from a distance.

Now It's confirmed that these ships are chasing my cruisers. What should I do? I'm thinking of moving them far away to Americas away from Europe (my lands).

I'm thinking of him them chase me away while my other units take advantage and attack algeria.

How do I destroy and get rid of these huge transport ship units that could potentially land on my lands in Europe!? What should I use? build submarines, airplanes?

I already have been tho this with a player. He had this huge ass unit of 900 trying to land in my port city so I bombed it while it was headed there and bombed it and attacked it while it was disembaking.

u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 4 days ago
▲ 30 r/GenZpk

The fine itself is a joke and so are the Shariat courts! When are we going to get independence from these state imposed mullahs.

The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) and the chairman of the Senate Standing Committee on Religious Affairs have opposed the law that imposes a Rs. 5,000 fine on a husband for contracting a second marriage without permission from the first wife. They termed the provision contrary to Islamic teachings.

The Senate Standing Committee on Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony discussed the matter during a meeting. Senator Hafiz Abdul Karim chaired the session because Standing Committee Chairman Senator Atta ur Rehman was occupied with other engagements.

Council of Islamic Ideology Chairman Dr. Raghib Hussain Naeemi also attended the meeting as a special participant. He gave the council's opinion on proposed amendments to Pakistan's family laws.

During the meeting, the committee reviewed the Muslim Family Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, a private member's bill introduced in the Senate by Senator Sarmad Ali on January 19, 2026.

The proposed bill seeks to increase the fine for a husband who contracts a second marriage without permission. It proposes raising the existing penalty from Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 50,000.

However, Senate Standing Committee on Religious Affairs Chairman Senator Dr. Abdul Karim opposed the proposal. He argued that when Shariah itself does not impose such a restriction on a second marriage, the law cannot justify even the existing Rs. 5,000 fine.

CII Chairman Dr. Raghib Hussain Naeemi also opposed the Rs. 5,000 penalty imposed on a husband for contracting a second marriage without permission.

u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 6 days ago
▲ 42 r/GenZpk

And some folks still glorify the Sharia laws.

I recently talked to an Afghan women refugee in the west who said something around the lines "Culture is the problem but it is the religion that legitimizes it".And some folks still glorify the shahria laws and shariat courts using 1500 year divine law that if you even talk about reforming or challenging can get you killed by islamist mobs or death penalty under false allegations of blasphemy.

u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 9 days ago
▲ 15 r/LGBTQpakistan+1 crossposts

Halal yaoi? Yurt (Dormitory, 2023) is a Turkish coming-of-age drama.

Yurt (Dormitory, 2023) is a Turkish coming-of-age drama directed by Nehir Tuna. Set in Turkey during the late 1990s, the film follows Ahmet, a 14-year-old boy who is sent by his father to a conservative Islamic boarding dormitory while continuing to attend a secular school.

As Ahmet struggles to adjust to the strict rules and expectations of dormitory life, he forms a close bond with another student, leading him to question his identity, freedom, faith, and sense of belonging. Through its intimate storytelling and realistic performances, the film explores adolescence, family pressure, and the tension between personal beliefs and societal expectations.

Premiering at the 2023 Venice International Film Festival, Yurt received widespread critical acclaim for its sensitive direction and emotionally powerful portrayal of growing up between two conflicting worlds.

u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 9 days ago

Why is that the Right wing leaders in Latin America so pro Israel while the left is so pro Palestina? is this something they do piss off each other?

I was always under the impression that Latin American people due to their history with American imperialism and European Colonization etc were more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause and these views were often reinforced by seeing big political leaders like Brazil president and out going Columbian president's being vocal in their support for Palestine.

Ik a lot of Latin American who vote for the right have pro Palestinian views as well but then why are right wing latin leaders so pro israeli like one of the first things the elected Columbian president did was hug the Israeli FM and yk Mellie bromance with Netanyahu.

It's sad seeing a humanitarian stance being torn between the right and left.

reddit.com
u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 12 days ago

What Whey Protein Powder brand should I buy?

They all seem expensive when I look at them online. The only Pakistani whey protein powder I found that was relatively cheap is Nutrifactor. I want good recommendations that aren't too expensive. I'm looking to bulk and gain muscle, so I'd like recommendations that are popular among bodybuilders. I want results and I'm open to all recommendations.

reddit.com
u/Prestigious-Rope3089 — 13 days ago