My take on what the Obession is

Regarding the movie "Obsession". I believe that based on all of the internal clues from the film and external clues from the primary sources that Freaky Nikki is an entity that was created by the One Wish Willow that possess the real Nikki.

Some suggests that Nikki suffers from BPD (I won't committ to a belief in that) My belief is that Nikki is attempting to bury the Freaky Nikki persona in the past in a normative sense of what her reputation was......However, I believe that the entity is separate force, the entity is using the perceived Freaky Nikki persona as the inspiration for the takeover of her soul. This seems to be supported by the fact that towards the end of the film the entity is completely self-aware of the wish and seems to mock Bear for creating this mess, the entity also makes every attempt to cover up the fact that Nikki is attempting to reclaim her faculties. But to support my case I have outlined some observations.

  1. The love Nikki exhibits doesn't feel like her own, even if we concede it was supernaturally enhanced.

We can imagine what it would be like to love someone 11/10 and it probably wouldn't end up entailing creating an alter for a dead animal (unless we assume the true Nikki's alter ego would be capable of this, which seems like an assumption).

  1. It's very clearly that the real Nikki is in a purgatory like state when she is not in the driver seat, at times she is viewing things through Freaky Nikki's POV, at times she is completely absent (this is why when she comes through she acts surprised by the enviornment at times). Also the fact that the phone operator was also able to visit or conjure Nikki's soul clearly shows her experience is supernaturally accessible if other people have access to it. It's very clear that she only regains her faculties when the entity is asleep.

  2. Throughout the film Nikki is able to slightly break through, when she writes statements like "Not me" which seems like a stretch if her own alter ego was responsible even if her natural alter ego was constituted and put in control of her other self-conception.

  3. The entity has extreme strength not indicative of anything Nikki should be capable of? Nikki doesn't come across as someone who has brute strength, but to beat someone's skin entirely off their face albeit even by slamming it against a brick, the angle she did it from was not adventagious. Also her ability to use a handgun with instant bulls-eye like accuracy without hesitation seems....odd?

  4. Now this could just be for the movies effect, but it does seem very intentional with how effective she is at causing carnage but ineffective at everything else; what's stranger is that the director said the wishes aren't inherently evil, however wishes can have extreme consequences when carelessly used.

  5. If Freaky Nikki never was a persona why would her actions have been different or the same? I think this gets to the main question.

Final Verdict: Nikki is possessed, not by anything demonic but by an entity that was created by a powerful wish request that needed to be fulfilled to the utmost.

reddit.com
u/PrinceOfDokkan — 7 hours ago
▲ 10 r/NFLForum+1 crossposts

Top 20 WR Seasons in RY/TPA (Updated 2025)

Two things were pointed out to me from the first post and I've since sharpened and updated the rankings.

  1. I've now included up to 2025 season, JSN incredibely is 2nd all-time and is the only WR in 2020s to have a 3.0 score or higher

  2. I went through and deducted games where a WR missed a game. This suggests a more accurate way to calculate a receiver's receiving yards per team pass attempt by only including the passing attempts from the games where the receiver actually played. This statistical metric is truly reflective of the opportunities that the receiver had.

“Player efficiency is measured using only games in which the player participated.”

(Football Outsiders, PFF, and ESPN Analytics)

“Participation is recorded for each player who plays at least one snap in a game.”

(NFL Player Participation Reports)

This is also more consistent with general NFL stat tracking and methodology.

In other words, thanks everyone for your input!

***How to interpret the score values***

***4.0+ — Mythical (Only one player in Modern-Era has achieved)***

​​Nearly unattainable in the modern NFL.

​​You'd be looking at an almost once-in-history type of season.

***3.0–3.99 — Historic / All-Time Great***

​​These are seasons that often end up on all-time lists.

​​On average only about 4 WR seasons in a given decade score a 3.0 or higher

​​Just 1 WR in 2020s has scored a 3.0 or higher to this point

***2.5–2.99 — Elite***

​​Usually an All-Pro caliber WR1.

​​Often among the league's very best in a given year.

***2.0–2.49 — Excellent***

​​High-end WR1 seasons.

​​Strong Pro Bowl level production.

***1.5–1.99 — Good***

​​Quality starter or lower-end WR1/high-end WR2.

***Below 1.5 — Average to role player***

​​Still valuable, but not carrying a passing offense.

***Only read beyond this point if your looking to learn more***

-This list is from modern era 1970(NFL merger)-2026 season (current)

For anyone who is not familiar:

Receiving Yards per Team Pass Attempt (RY/TPA) is a advanced metric/formula that measures how many receiving yards a player produced for every pass attempt by his own team. For the most accurate score, inelligible/missed games will be subtracted from the teams pass attempts in order that the WR in question is not impacted by games they were unable to participate in.

Citation: https://www.footballperspective.com/yearly-leaders-in-receiving-yards-per-team-pass-attempt/

Many consider it a universal WR metric since it adjusts for offensive volume. A receiver on a pass-heavy team has more opportunities to accumulate yards. RY/TPA asks, "How much of the team's passing offense did this receiver generate?" instead of just rewarding high-volume offenses.

It captures market share and efficiency together. To post a high number, a receiver must both earn a large share of the offense and produce a lot of yards with those opportunities.

The best part is that this metric works across NFL history. Unlike other advanced metrics such as yards per route run, this can be calculated for every season going back decades, making it useful for comparing players from different eras.

It rewards true offensive impact. If a team's passing game succeeds primarily because of one receiver, that player will stand out in this metric.

That's why it's such a powerful metric. It ties a receiver's production directly to the passing offense, rather than just counting raw yards or receptions.

If you're looking for the receiver equivalent of "yards per attempt", this is about as close as you'll get, football analysts consider it one of the best historical measures of a receiver's impact.

Feel free to use and share the above image and quotes from this post if you'd like.

u/PrinceOfDokkan — 1 month ago
▲ 8 r/NFLv2

Top 20 WR Seasons in (RY/TPA)

***How to interpret the score values***

***4.0+ — Mythical (Hypothetical)***

​​Essentially unattainable in the modern NFL.

​​You'd be looking at a once-in-history type of season.

***3.0–3.99 — Historic / All-Time Great***

​​These are seasons that often end up on all-time lists.

​​On average only about 4 WR seasons in a given decade score a 3.0 or higher

***2.5–2.99 — Elite***

​​Usually an All-Pro caliber WR1.

​​Often among the league's very best in a given year.

***2.0–2.49 — Excellent***

​​High-end WR1 seasons.

​​Strong Pro Bowl level production.

***1.5–1.99 — Good***

​​Quality starter or lower-end WR1/high-end WR2.

***Below 1.5 — Average to role player***

​​Still valuable, but not carrying a passing offense.

***Only read beyond this point if your looking to learn more***

-This list is from modern era 1970 (NFL merger)-2024 season.

For anyone who is not familiar:

Receiving Yards per Team Pass Attempt (RY/TPA) is a advanced metric/formula that measures how many receiving yards a player produced for every pass attempt by his own team.

Citation: https://www.footballperspective.com/yearly-leaders-in-receiving-yards-per-team-pass-attempt/

Many consider it a universal WR metric since it adjusts for offensive volume. A receiver on a pass-heavy team has more opportunities to accumulate yards. RY/TPA asks, "How much of the team's passing offense did this receiver generate?" instead of just rewarding high-volume offenses.

It captures market share and efficiency together. To post a high number, a receiver must both earn a large share of the offense and produce a lot of yards with those opportunities.

The best part is that this metric works across NFL history. Unlike other advanced metrics such as yards per route run, this can be calculated for every season going back decades, making it useful for comparing players from different eras.

It rewards true offensive impact. If a team's passing game succeeds primarily because of one receiver, that player will stand out in this metric.

That's why it's such a powerful metric. It ties a receiver's production directly to the passing offense, rather than just counting raw yards or receptions.

If you're looking for the receiver equivalent of "yards per attempt", this is about as close as you'll get, football analysts consider it one of the best historical measures of a receiver's impact.

Feel free to use and share the above image and quotes from this post if you'd like.

u/PrinceOfDokkan — 1 month ago
▲ 9 r/Chucky

Is Child's Play the best film? My Take:

Is Child's Play 1 the best film?

This is somewhat a response to fellow Chucky member who brought forth an interesting statment that I have heard many affirm, that being that CP1 has the best story and is in likelihood the best overall film due to it laying the groundwork for the entire series among other significant argumentation.

In my brief writeup I'm going to give my own personal opinion on the question

Preface: Child's Play does seem to be more favorable Chucky film among critics and fans alike. It's final draft is an orginal story that stands out among slasher films.

After watching Child's Play the first time I was in absolute AWE of how much I enjoyed it, so much so that I came back to watch it multiple times over. Sadly though, as time has gone on I realized how the re-watch value is lacking due to slow buildup of the film. Much of CP1 is used to suspensfully build up to the big reveal of Chucky's true doll persona, but sadly once the reveal loses it's novelty the film becomes much less effective.

Overall the film doesn't take as many chances as the other films and ends up turning into a pretty cut and dry film of good vs evil. With characters typically falling onto one side or the other without much gray area.

Conclusion: The film is great, but re-watchability and boldness goes a long way in my personal Chucky rankings. I still hold that Child's Play 2 is the best film due to it being similiar in effectiveness and cohesiveness of the story while allowing the Chucky character to take center stage. Overall the climax in Child's Play 1 is second only maybe to number 2 itself.

Child's Play is a fantastic film and I wouldn't fault anybody for having it #1. But I'm not so quick to definitively crown CP1 the best film in the franchise.

reddit.com
u/PrinceOfDokkan — 1 month ago
▲ 7 r/NFLv2

Larry Fitzgerald vs Steve Smith

From 2008 prior to Divisional Round Game. Comparing these 2 Elite WRs. What's your impressions of the analysis? Who was better at that time?

u/PrinceOfDokkan — 3 months ago