Justifying Flashpoint

A common criticism for season 3 is that Flashpoint was too underwhelming, especially compared to comics or animated series. And it’s fair if you don’t like it, but I can’t say it was necessarily bad considering what they had to work with.

I mean the CW already has a limited amount of DC IPs. So they can’t do anything like the animated series with flashpoint where they explored Batman in Flashpoint, as well as every superhero suffering from the butterfly effect. Anything even REMOTELY similar would need to rely on other TV shows (Flashpoint versions of Arrow etc). But considering Arrow was still airing at the time of season 3, there’s gonna be obvious scheduling conflicts between the Arrow actors and Flash. And that’s one thing, but Flashpoint also needs the consequences to be relayed throughout the series, and so even if the scheduling headache is sorted out, from there season 3 will either be entirely Flarrow (which isn’t fair to anyone cause the Arrow already has a show and the Flash should be focused on) or making Flashpoint largely filler, which would also suck cause that means less time on the actual story and it will likely end up underdeveloped (as we see in later seasons).

So with the limited resources we could only explore the alternative lives of side characters, which we did. And although alternative Batmen, Arrrows, Legends, etc can stretch multiple episodes for an interesting story. I really don’t think the same can be said about less known hero’s like Vibe. So if they did make Flashpoint multiple episodes it also would have just overstayed its welcome.

So if they couldn’t do anything interesting with Flashpoint itself the next best thing is to make the consequences of Flashpoint the main focus of season 3, which I think they did really well. With alchemy and Savitar and etc.

Again I think it’s fair to like other iterations of Flashpoint better but I also don’t necessarily think saying this Flashpoint was “poorly handled” is really accurate either

reddit.com
u/Prize_Bug3453 — 2 days ago

I was rewatching Trollhunters: Rise of the Titans and noticed this

Idk, take it with a grain of salt. But am I crazy or?

u/Prize_Bug3453 — 16 days ago

Theory: Deya saved Jim from the Darklands

Okay so in season 2 of Trollhunters the past Trollhunters in the void make a plan to save Jim from the Darklands.

So then there's the question: What made Jim so special to them? Cause every previous time a Trollhunter was about to die, they just watched and went "well, that sucks" without any intervention. So why Jim in particular when he was doomed to die?

Well in Wizards we see Troll-Jim meet a past version of Deya, and as he leaves Deya says "Fellow trollhunter" so she knows Jim was a trollhunter as he left.

We also know Jim was the first Trollhunter to gather the Triambric Stones and dawn the Eclipse Armor.

Anyway this is my theory: When Jim was first Trollhunter, the other trollhunters dismissed him as human until he killed Bular, that includes Deya. THEN: He dawned the Eclipse Armor, and Deya recognized him as the time-travel Troll who helped her prior to the battle of Killahead. Hence she gathered the other Trollhunters to do something, and with her being the most respected Trollhunter of all time, they decided to actually do something about this Trollhunter's death in contrary to what they did in the past.

BUT HEY THAT'S JUST A THEORY

u/Prize_Bug3453 — 21 days ago

Do you suppose Jim's plan involves Gaylen's core?

Like everyone I hate the ending of the film. But I am wondering the practicality of how Jim plans on saving everyone.

Jim going back in time is in order to save everyone who died, so I assume that involves Draal, Vendel, Mother, Merlin, Aja and Krel's parents, Strikler, Nomura, Archie, Nari, and maybe Morgana and Angor Rot, all whilst simultaneously saving the world from Bular, Angor, Gunmar, Morgana, Morando, the Green Knight, and the Arcane Order.

Now even as a side step I feel Jim could get them to speedrun assembling the Triambric Stones, rooting out the Changlings and Spies of Trollmarket, finding Merlin, and navigating through the Darklands into the Changeling Nursery with a Cradle Stone. The real complication is the Green Knight ambushing Toby in this timeline and the Arcane Order getting their hands on the Genesis Seals, cause that part seems inevitable.

So I was wondering how he'd stop that, when I realized he would already know Aja and Krel are aliens, and I assume he and Toby did an exposition dump off screen between Wizards and RoT cause he refers to their homeworld, Akiridion-Five, despite never hearing that name on screen before.

So my guess is: When he finally meets Aja and Krel, he can guide them straight to Gaylen's Core, which they could get way easier cause Morando and an army of Omens won't be breathing down their necks. And a Gaylen-Core-Amped Aja or Krel would deal with Morando with no fatalities, as well make it a lot easier to deal with the Green Knight and the Arcane Order.

reddit.com
u/Prize_Bug3453 — 27 days ago

The Star Beast Review

Okay context: I watched Doctor Who when I was younger, I stopped roughly when Twice Upon a Time aired. I mainly watched on DVDs cause it was hard to find a streaming site for Doctor Who where I lived, and then it got harder to keep track of and it sort of fizzled. Found a site to watch Doctor Who, but before I catch up everything I missed (13th doctor, roughly half of the 11th and 12th doctor episodes), I thought I'd watch The Star Beast first cause I heard it brings back Tennant's doctor and Donna Noble.

My opinion: It's not great.

What I enjoyed:

I really enjoyed the actors and their chemistry, the mini plot twist, as well as the overall story concept.

What I found lacking:

It completely fizzles the tragedy and stakes of the Meta Crisis. Sure Donna Noble didn't die immediately when she remembered cause part of the Meta Crisis got put into her daughter. But then the resolution was just "let it go"? That just undermines what made it dangerous. Like if the resolution to the Infinity Stones overloading you being "let it go" NOBODY would like that. And that's one thing, why did they tie it into "I found out because I'm a woman"? Don't get me wrong: I applaud the messaging. But it's just as stupid if it was resolved cause she understood "cancer is tragic" or "genocide is wrong", both correct and applaudable messages but completely overlooks what made the Meta Crisis so tragic and unique. In Journey's End the Doctor specifically said such a thing never existed cause there can't be, and it's not like there's no female timelords or Donna wasn't a woman during that event so it just further undercuts when the Doctor said "There can't be a meta crisis, that's why it never happened before".

I also wished they spent longer addressing Tennant's face returning. Each character spends maybe 3 minutes on it. And they had such an opportunity too cause every freshly regenerated doctor spends an episode in a somewhat identity crisis cause they're still "cooking", and it's a perfect opportunity to do it with an old face returning, like a more personal version of the 12th doctor having the face of a person the Doctor saved in Pompeii.

I don't love Donna giving away the lotto money. Cause it was a final gift from both the Doctor and her father, so again: It feels like a slap in the face to the beautiful goodbye 10 left for Donna. But that's one thing, then it's just played off for an admittedly funny scene of Donna ranting about giving away money, but never address the emotional value of what was given up.

David Tennant's acting is amazing as usual, but I felt that they were too quick to show off the emotional beats. The most intense Tennant moments I can think of (they all died speech from Waters of Mars, the "I can do so much more" speech from the finale), they all built up in emotion. Such as if 0 was completely calm and 10 was complete crash out, in these scenes, within a few minutes the Doctor slowly built up the emotions one step at a time, one digit at a time (5, 6, 7, 8) until it finally hit 10 at the climax and delivered an emotionally engaging performance. But here that beat is missing, it goes from 6 straight to 10, and thus the crashout is understandable but doesn't hold the same as the other scenes I mentioned. And considering how personal this scene was I felt it should have held it's own like the two speeches I cited, but doesn't (still holds well don't get me wrong, I just felt it could have been better)

They also don't address why events began bending around Donna and her family again (at least I don't remember). In Journey's End it was Dalek Caan bending the timeline as well as the Meta Crisis Doctor creating a timeline to converge. Another explanation for Donna's Grandfather being tied cause of the timelords in the Doctor's regeneration story.

By itself it'd just be a generic Doctor Who episode, but the amount of great storylines and finality it undoes for an unsatisfying reason and conclusion just brings it down for me. That and the potential storylines that got overlooked. I'd really just rather they didn't bring back Donna considering how great and personal the goodbye and her storyline was. And if they NEEDED to bring back an old companion, Martha and Micky would be my pick. Rose and Donna had their stories shut, but Micky and Martha went off to work in the military and fight aliens, so that's a lot more of an open ended finale. The Doctor did just give them a nod goodbye. So if they HAD to bring back an old companion I think this would be a good way to not ruin the finality of the companions. But even then, I'd just rather the old companions get a cameo at most and he gets a different companion.

But that's just my opinion. Thoughts?

reddit.com
u/Prize_Bug3453 — 2 months ago

When Davros got betrayed couldn’t he have just flicked the switch on his chair to make the Daleks voice-control only again?

Watched Genesis of the Daleks for the first time. Loved it. but this did stick out in my mind.

u/Prize_Bug3453 — 2 months ago