The mods kindly granted me permission to share this here.

Geofancy is a free geomancy workspace I've been building since 2022. It generates the shield and the twelve houses from the four Mothers, runs perfection and the Way of Points, and presents structured reference material alongside the chart. It's meant to reduce bookkeeping friction and support study not to replace careful human interpretation.

🔗 Geofancy Beta

A bit of background

I first heard of geomancy in 2022 and was immediately taken with it. Polyphanes / Sam Block's writing was what helped me find good sources and serious material to work through, and John Michael Greer's The Art and Practice of Geomancy was the book I learned the modern revival of the system from, it shaped how I came to the art and how I first structured the engine. I owe both of them a real debt.

Around the same time I'd just started my first job as a software engineer full-stack, Microsoft stack, and I wanted to build the geomancy tool I wished existed and through building a tool I could start to understand geomancy from first principles. I started with a WinForms desktop app in C#: shield generation, house projection, perfections, no AI involved (it didn't really meaningfully exist for coding yet). Years of slow evolution later, that engine grew up into the web app you see now.

What it does

^(Seeks to go well above and beyond Georatio!)

• Full chart generation from the four Mothers to get the Daughters, Nieces, Witnesses, Judge, Reconciler, twelve-house projection, both shield and traditional house chart views.
• Perfections analysis that's the deepest I've personally found in a any geomancy tool: occupation, conjunction, translation, mutation, aspect (treated as a perfecting mode in its own right when significators move into the configuration as per Greers rule of significators and forming aspects), and Company of Houses with all four subtypes (Simple, DemiSimple, Compound, Capitular). Aspects are tracked with Dexter / Sinister direction, and the connections are weighted into a calculated favorable / unfavorable / net score with the full paper trail visible (calculated by translating Greers tables).
• Way of Points/Via Puncti surfaced seriously rather than skipped or half, implemented as it is in many digital tools. get a deep understanding on how each of the Via Puncti/Way of Points are formed and how they can inform your frame of interpretation, learn how to distinguish the way of fire/air/water/earth systematically.
• Court positions with per-position interpretive notes.
• Structured reference panels for figures, houses, and court positions written for use while you're at the chart, not just for study at rest.
• Dedicated mobile and desktop UIs so the workspace actually fits the device, phones get a chart-first layout with thumb-sized Mother input cells (4. Genitor, 3. Fratres, 2. Lucrum, 1. Vita).
• Shareable chart links (?seed=…) and JSON export for archiving readings, sending them to a study group, or comparing notes with a teacher.
• Light and dark themes.
• No account, no login, no chart database. The randomization stays with your hands; the app does not cast for you.

About the corpus and lineage

I want to be straightforward about this because it matters in our community.

The engine and the original interpretive scaffolding were structured around Greer's approach, which is the modern English-language framework I learned the art through. The mechanical doctrine, the four classical perfecting modes, the use of aspects, Company of Houses, the broad shape of the Way of Points, is from the shared traditional record that Greer himself works from.

The on-screen reference text in the app today, however, is my own writing. I have rewritten every figure, house, and court description (beyond short one word descriptors) from my own practice, my own reading notes, and publicly available sources (Agrippa's Three Books of Occult Philosophy, Cattan, Heydon, Fludd, Hartmann, and material in the public domain), expanding well past where I started. None of Greer's prose, definitions, or wording is reproduced in the app, the corpus is my own, and is licensed for non-commercial reuse so other practitioners can quote from it freely. I deliberately didn't want to ride on copyrighted text I don't own; rewriting it forced me to deepen the material, my understanding of geomancy and own what I was presenting.

So: doctrinal lineage acknowledged, copyrighted prose not reproduced, and the educational reference text in the app is something you can read and quote without worrying about the IP underneath.

How AI was used (and where it categorically wasn't)

• At runtime, when you cast: there is no AI involved at all. Chart construction, perfection detection, scoring, Way of Points, court placement; every one of these runs as deterministic code paths I wrote and own. No LLM is reading your chart, summarizing your figures, or generating a verdict per session. The same four Mothers will always produce exactly the same chart and analysis.
• The interpretive reference text described above is written from my own practice and from public sources. It is not generated per-reading by an AI, its a complex directory and API working together with my own engine.
• In development, I have used AI-assisted coding tools (like cursor) to speed up UI work and engineering plumbing for the modern web client. The geomancy engine itself predates that era and was written by hand; later refactors and the web rewrite were assisted but human-reviewed.

All the Technical Design and UI/UX Design decision, Process Flows, Data Object Model Schemas, Calculation formulas, and API structures were curated and intentionally developed by hand and logically constructed by myself and my own knowledge of engineering solutions in C# .NET and web architecture.

If the distinction matters to anyone reading: no part of your reading or user experience, sees a server database, let alone touches an AI.

Free, and intended to stay that way

Geofancy is free to use. There's no paywall, no premium tier, no upsell, no ads, and no subscription. I intend to keep the core experience free indefinitely. If anything monetized ever appears in the future, it will be optional and will not gate the chart engine, perfections, Way of Points, or the existing reference material.

On software, "canned" interpretation, and what this tool actually is

I want to say this plainly because it matters more than any feature list:

Geofancy's on-screen text is reference material; vocabulary, structure, and prompts are to think with your own interpretation. Software cannot read a chart for you. It cannot weigh your situation, your timing, your relationship to the question, the figure's resonances in your life, or anything else that requires a human mind in contact with a real moment. Whatever any digital tool prints; mine included, however thorough: is not a substitute for your own discernment, study, mentorship, or reading from a qualified practitioner.

Use Geofancy like a sharp knife and a careful checklist, if anything; developing this app was for myself to learn about geomancy on a deep systematic level. That I could break it down in a user friendly way to help improve and build my own interpretation of the charts and help develop a deeper correspondent relationship with the figures and the placement mentally. I sincerely hope that Geofancy's additional features for analysis provide a deeper more interconnected understanding of geomancy for the benefit of every practitioner and the preservation of the art.

What I'd value feedback on

• Tone and accuracy of the reference corpus if a figure description, house affinity, court placement, or perfection commentary lands wrong, please tell me.
• Any bugs or issues Report issues with the app performance or chart output, it has been tested pretty rigorously, but there might be a couple of edge cases.

🔗 App: Geofancy Beta 🔗 Source / issues: Geofancy Github

Thanks for reading, and thanks to the mods for letting me share this. Looking forward to feedback from users who actually know the art.

— u/ProtagonistThomas