FWI: James Talarico cleanly defeats Ken Paxton by 15 pounts in the Texas Senate race. By January 2027, the Texas state government is doing everything possible to keep Talarico from being seated lawfully.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 13 days ago

FWI: A huge number of feral pigs invade a crowded recess schoolyard in a wealthy Dallas suburb. Anyone who falls is devoured. By the time police are done shooting, hundreds of pigs and twelve humans are dead.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 15 days ago

FWI: Trump says he should think about an executive order to treat any city or state that “dares to vote for illegal communism and illegal socialism” like “1960s Vietnam to be rescued at last”.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 17 days ago

FWI: Worldwide scientists declare one whale species sentient.

Difty science papers all came out at once tomorrow endorsed by thousands of reputable experts with shockingly easy to retest data that scientists have decoded a species of whale song to be an actual functional language with syntax, context, and everything that flat out says:

This type of whale is 100% sentient. Anyone can retest, all the recordings and methodology there. Hard bulletproof confirmed, you'd be a lunatic to contest it or a speciest loon.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 1 month ago

FWI: An anonymous fundraiser collects $10 million for a fireworks show in a major city to go off if and when current President leaves office by any method.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 1 month ago

Why is it so bad for government to offer subsidies, novel legal protections and major tax gifts to businesses, but it’s often fought tooth and nail against far smaller equivalent benefits for citizens directly?

EDIT: I screwed up the title slightly.

Basically: why do conservatives as a policy generally support and vote for business subsidies and tax giveaways for business, but typically oppose or limit benefits to individuals?

Example 1: Trump tax cuts in term one had no sunset clause for business… but did for individuals. Why put that sunset in at all?

Example 2: It’s ever easier for companies to shield or shed liabilities - but it’s fought hard for people to more easily shed debt.

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 1 month ago

Do you support Texas Republicans, even at this late hour in an election year, trying to close almost 100 polling stations in a swing area?

How can this not be seen in any way but "might makes right", which is antithetical to human norms and democracy.

Are conservatives afraid of a straight battle of voters and ideas?

https://apnews.com/article/texas-voting-poll-closures-talarico-paxton-14753f336d2977fdd0dd88492e707035

I cannot fathom a valid reason to do this as voting is about to start but to "thumb on the scale".

u/PyroIsSpai — 1 month ago

FWI: Karma suddenly becomes rather real, and its swiftness is equal to the volume and intensity of the good or bad, help or harm, as you put out. How does the world look by Christmas?

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 2 months ago

Why are Republicans undoing worker heat protections?

Do you agree with this deregulation to undo worker protections?

https://theweek.com/politics/heat-workplace-protections-trump-osha

> It is hot out there. Summertime heat can take a deadly toll on workers, especially in the era of climate change and frequent heat domes. The Biden administration initiated rules to ensure that U.S. companies provide their employees with breaks to hydrate and recover while laboring in warm temperatures. Now the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are looking to roll back those protections. > > ‘A matter of life and death’ > > Heat causes “hundreds of workplace deaths” every year, but the Trump administration is rewriting rules that “mandate breaks and access to water and shade for workers,” said The New York Times. The details of those changes are still unknown, but already the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is “curtailing workplace inspections” that had been designed to “raise awareness of heat-related illnesses.” > > A House committee last month also gave approval to a bill that would block the Labor Department “finalizing any worker protections for extreme heat,” said E&E News. The Biden-era rule solves a “problem that doesn’t need solving,” Rep. Mark Messmer (R-Ind.) told the outlet. At least a few workers disagree. “We didn’t sign up for the heat to become as severe as it is,” Trina David, a baggage handler at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, said to the Times. > > “Trump will cause some of you to die from the heat,” Robert Reich said on Substack. There are countless workers who toil “under the hot sun, or in stifling warehouses or in delivery trucks with no AC,” which can “trigger heat stroke, organ failure and chronic kidney disease.” Those illnesses and deaths “can often be prevented with strong safety standards,” but the Trump administration is “retreating from worker safety.” Workplace heat protections are “literally a matter of life and death.” > > The Biden-era rules had a “deep benevolent paternalism” to them, Matthew Kahn said at Environmental and Urban Economics. But workers possess a “degree of choice over where they live and work, what job they take and what shifts they agree to work,” Kahn and Joseph Tracy said in a 2025 paper for the American Enterprise Institute. They can “move or switch firms” if conditions are too onerous. There is “no ‘crisis’” in on-the-job heat injuries that requires a heavy regulatory touch. > > ‘Can’t afford to stay cool’ > > New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani in June signed an executive order “ensuring the safety of municipal workers in the heat,” said E&E News. Workers should not have to “choose between their paycheck and their health,” Mamdani said at the signing ceremony. > > For many workers, though, the twin trends of “high temperatures and high inflation” are creating a “crisis that rarely makes headlines,” Sharon Block and Dr. Satchit Balsari said at USA Today. Cash-strapped workers increasingly “can’t afford to stay cool.” Rising prices force them to choose between paying for “food, rent and healthcare” or the electricity needed to “cool off during their off-hours.” The combination of low wages, increased costs and poor protections are forcing workers into “deadly trade-offs.”

u/PyroIsSpai — 2 months ago

Aside from reasons of "real politik", is there any justifiable reason for anyone to maintain the ongoing "Is Mitch McConnell alive or functional?" mystery going?

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 2 months ago

[MCU Spidey all films including BND] what happens if Peter takes them to meet Doctor Strange?

Example:

Post-Brand New Day… Spider-Man (not Peter/Maynard) asks MJ and Ned to meet him at a given address at a certain time: noon tomorrow.

They go, and it’s the Sanctum Santorum. Spidey rings the bell. Stephen answers.

Spider-Man, after he and Stephen hug (Spidey did save his life and they saved the universe together), he says, “Stephen, I’d like you to meet—“

Now:

Stephen was not compelled to forgot MJ and Ned. We know how his memory is. He just has no idea who PETER is anymore. Spidey is his anonymous friend.

Presumably he does that “uh oh” Strange tone and says “MJ and Ned… and why can you use a sling ring? And why do I know that? And why do I know two other Spider-Men, Spider-Man?”

Or something to that effect.

What happens if Peter rings that bell? I mean, last time he rang a bell, it took care of one problem… and Parker luck is good luck, right…?

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 2 months ago

Why does the USA need a position on, let alone a plan, to cause the International Criminal Court (ICC) to lose power and cease to be, as we aren’t even members?

We aren’t a party to these treaties.

Other countries never need our permission to make treaties that we are not party to.

We have no authority legal or otherwise on legal interstate affairs between, say, Belgium and New Zealand.

Why are Republicans even talking about something:

  1. expressly none of their business

  2. beyond their power and authority

Why is the ICC an increasing important topic?

What business is it of ours?

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 3 months ago

From an American legal perspective, why is it ok to arrest Preidents of Central and South American nations, but not Presidents of Middle East nations?

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 3 months ago

FWI: Trump issues the Tate brothers unconditional pardons and declares they are exempt from extradition on “fake radical left child porn planted by lunatic Democrats.”

reddit.com
u/PyroIsSpai — 3 months ago