I do not support David Kertes for mayor, and these are my reasons.

Santa Clara County’s certified 2024 election results show that District 5 voters reelected Suds Jain with 3,539 votes to David Kertes’s 3,010. Kertes subsequently launched an effort to recall Jain. In February 2026, he ended that effort and shifted his focus to running for mayor. The Silicon Valley Voice reported that the recall campaign had gathered approximately half the required signatures with a little more than three weeks remaining.

Kertes offered his own explanation for ending the recall, and I will not claim to know his private motives. Residents can examine the sequence of events and reach their own conclusions.

When I publicly criticized his political and community record, his attorney sent me a cease-and-desist letter. A demand letter is not a court order or a court judgment. My attorney disputed the allegations and maintained that my comments were protected political opinion. To my knowledge, no court has ruled that I defamed David Kertes. I will continue expressing my opinions while remaining willing to correct any factual error supported by credible evidence.

I have spent more than a decade advocating for the restoration of Santa Clara’s historic downtown. Kertes now says he supports revitalizing downtown. My question is straightforward: What specific, documented work did he do on downtown planning before seeking public office, through task-force meetings, planning workshops, grant advocacy, policy work or other measurable contributions? Campaign promises should be evaluated against documented results, and I am willing to review any documentation he provides.

If Kertes is telling residents that he would be able to vote on every downtown matter, that should not be presented as a blanket conclusion. FPPC conflict-of-interest rules require a decision-specific analysis. Decisions concerning property within 500 feet of an official’s property are generally treated differently from decisions concerning property between 500 and 1,000 feet, and the rules also contain exceptions. The correct question is whether each particular decision would require recusal.

If elected, Kertes should disclose the relevant conflict analysis and seek written FPPC advice before participating in downtown decisions that could affect his property.

These are my opinions based on the public record. Residents deserve documented answers and should review the evidence for themselves.

Sources:
Santa Clara County certified 2024 election results
Report on Kertes ending the recall and pursuing the mayor’s office
Report concerning the cease-and-desist exchange
FPPC Regulation 18702.2 index

reddit.com
u/Raskul1 — 2 days ago

I do not support Kathy Watanabe for Mayor of Santa Clara

I do not support Kathy Watanabe for mayor.
My primary disagreement with her concerns the future of Santa Clara’s downtown. At a recent coffee chat, I understood Watanabe to say that Related Santa Clara should be built first and that she hoped revenue from Related would help finance downtown’s restoration. If I misunderstood her position, I invite her to clarify it publicly.

I believe that approach is backward and financially risky. Related Santa Clara is a separate, privately developed 240-acre project whose schedule has repeatedly slipped. In 2019, its first phase was projected to be completed in 2023. Yet in April 2025, the project was still described as being in limbo and requiring additional review before construction could begin. Its plans were substantially revised again later that year.

Santa Clara should not place downtown on indefinite hold while waiting for revenue from a project with an uncertain construction schedule.
The City Council adopted the Downtown Precise Plan in December 2023, and the city is continuing to work on its implementation and Community Benefits Program. The city’s published downtown process does not identify completion of Related Santa Clara as a prerequisite

Both projects should be allowed to move forward on parallel tracks. If Related eventually produces revenue that can legally support downtown, that money could supplement other funding, but it should not control when downtown moves forward. Santa Clara should develop an independent, transparent financing strategy using appropriate developer contributions, community benefits, grants, partnerships and other legally available sources.
I want a mayor who treats downtown as a priority with its own schedule, financing strategy and accountability, not as a project that must wait indefinitely for uncertain revenue from another development.
Sources:

City of Santa Clara: Related Santa Clara
Related project remained in limbo in April 2025
Related Santa Clara’s plans changed again in July 2025
City of Santa Clara: Downtown Precise Plan and implementation

reddit.com
u/Raskul1 — 2 days ago

Welcome to National Night Out.

TONIGHTS THE NIGHT. 6:00 to 8:00 pm.

We’re fired up for National Night Out! 🚒🔥 Sparky will be there, along with a fire truck and possibly the police department’s new D.A.R.E. car! Bring the kids by—they’ll love it almost as much as Sparky loves stealing the spotlight. 😂💕

Come on down to 623 Robin Drive, in beautiful 😍 Santa Clara

reddit.com
u/Raskul1 — 16 days ago

Should attorneys go to jail for harming children? What if they steal from families or from taxpayers who pay them to represent children? Everyone has an opinion on such issues, and today I gave mine… | Susan J. Bassi

linkedin.com
u/Raskul1 — 25 days ago
▲ 0 r/Sunnyvale+1 crossposts

😂 I’M NOT POSTING TOO MUCH… I’M JUST MEDICALLY SUPERVISED! 😂

🥰 You may have noticed I’ve become a social media addict lately. No, Facebook didn’t hire me. No, I’m not running for influencer of the year. And no… I haven’t learned TikTok dances. (Let’s not get carried away.)

The truth is, I have a lot to say! Sometimes it’s about Downtown Santa Clara, sometimes it’s politics, sometimes it’s opinions, sometimes it’s showcasing amazing people, and every now and then… I just enjoy making you laugh.

But here’s the real reason…

About seven weeks ago, I managed to fracture two vertebrae in my lower back. Apparently, gravity and I had a disagreement. During the CT scan, the doctors also found a little 9 mm spot on my lung. As if my body wasn’t already providing enough entertainment. Also, the tip of my left lung has collapsed making my breathing very stressful.

To top it off, I had to cancel the vacation I’d been planning for over a year. My passport is now sitting in a drawer giving me dirty looks.

My daily schedule is now thrilling beyond belief:
💊 Pills.
😮‍💨 Four to five breathing treatments.
🚶 A brisk walk until I’m huffing, puffing, coughing, wheezing, and sounding like an old lawn mower that won’t start.

If anyone wants excitement, I can live-stream my breathing treatments. I guarantee they’ll put you to sleep faster than Netflix.

So… I post.

It keeps my mind busy, my fingers exercised, and gives me a chance to keep everyone informed about what’s happening in Santa Clara—especially our Downtown, because I’m simply too stubborn to quit caring.

If I seem to be posting every 15 minutes… don’t worry. It’s cheaper than therapy.

If a post isn’t your cup of tea, just keep scrolling. But if you decide to comment, please remember… you haven’t walked in these orthopedic shoes. At 84 years old, I’m just doing my best to heal, stay positive, and maybe make a few people smile along the way.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I think I’m due for breathing treatment number… oh, who knows anymore. 😜❤️

Three things I will never give up, The Downtown, the Coffee Chats, and yes I will be going to this event even if I cough all the way there.

u/Raskul1 — 28 days ago

The State is getting desperate!!

SB 79 Is Here. Santa Clara Can Either Lead - or Be Left Behind. The State is getting desperate.

California’s Senate Bill 79 is no longer a proposal. It is the law.

Within days of the law taking effect on July 1, a developer in Palo Alto filed the first project under SB 79 before the city could put local implementation measures in place. That wasn’t an accident. Developers are paying attention, and they are moving quickly.

Santa Clara should be paying just as much attention.

Unlike many cities, Santa Clara has spent years planning for growth. We have the Station Area Specific Plan. We have the Downtown Precise Plan. We have completed environmental review. We have publicly owned land in Downtown. We have one of the Bay Area’s most important transit hubs. We have a vision.

What we have lacked is urgency.

For years, we’ve commissioned studies, hired consultants, formed committees, and debated what our Downtown should become. Meanwhile, housing demand has continued to grow, state housing laws have become more aggressive, and Sacramento has steadily shifted more authority away from cities that fail to act.

SB 79 is the latest example.

If Santa Clara’s local regulations are not fully aligned with state law, developers may increasingly look to SB 79 rather than local zoning. That means the City has less control - not more.

The solution is not to stop development.

The solution is to lead it.

Downtown Santa Clara should be our highest priority. Blocks A and B are publicly owned. The vision already exists. The infrastructure planning has been underway for years. Every year we delay, construction costs rise, opportunities disappear, and the State gains a stronger role in determining what gets built.

This isn’t just about housing.

It’s about creating the downtown Santa Clara has talked about for generations—a vibrant center with homes, restaurants, retail, entertainment, public gathering spaces, and a true civic heart connected to one of the region’s most important transit stations.

If we continue to hesitate, we shouldn’t be surprised when others make the decisions for us.

Santa Clara still has the opportunity to shape its own future.

But that window will not stay open forever.

The question isn’t whether growth is coming.

The question is simple:

Will Santa Clara lead its future - or will we continue reacting to it after someone else has already made the next move?

u/Raskul1 — 1 month ago

Two major divisions - one common thread!!

In my opinion, there were no winners in either the Convention Center/Chamber dispute or the PAL BMX controversy.

Both conflicts began during Mayor Lisa Gillmor’s administration. Whether you supported the City’s position or not, it’s fair to ask whether these situations could have been handled differently before they grew into years of division.

The Convention Center dispute ended with a settlement, damaged relationships, and a fractured partnership with the business community.

The BMX dispute divided families, volunteers, and the community around a youth program that had once brought people together.

To me, the common denominator isn’t the Chamber or the BMX volunteers, it’s the City’s approach to resolving conflict. When disagreements repeatedly escalate into public battles, litigation, and community division, leadership deserves scrutiny along with everyone else involved.

No one truly won. The people who paid the price were the residents, taxpayers, local businesses, and our youth.

Santa Clara deserves leadership that brings people together, solves problems before they become crises, and leaves the community stronger - not more divided.

u/Raskul1 — 2 months ago