

Would victoria 3 become a lot more popular if the economic and political problems are fixed? Would victoria 3 also require a different or improved military system? Or would victoria 3 remain not as popular as the other paradox gsg titles, even if the issues are fixed?
Asking because im wondering if victorias "unpopularity" is inherent to its economic and political focus. Or if its because vic 3 economic and politics are not well designed. etc etc
genuine question, is there anyway to convince people away from these insane beliefs. Or is it near-impossible
So how do tankies cope when you tell them stalin admited that lenins testament was true
Just curious
Europeans:
-arrived in north america and required native cooperation to survive
-europeans built up some colonies
-eventually after colonies grew big enough, europeans increasingly didnt need native help
-europeans started becoming increasingly predatory towards native americans
-europeans now americans started taking over native american land
-the end goal resulting in massive native american death, with the few survivors being isolated in reserves
-americans now recieve the heavy benefit of being the sole controller of the land. Which lead them to becoming a industrial superpower
Potential ai superintelligence:
-relies on humans to create its proto forms (early ai)
-humans build ai up until eventaully ai starts building itself up
-eventaully after ai becomes complex enough, ai becomes increasingly indepndent
-ai now doesnt need humans and can become potentially predatory.
-the possible end goal resulting in human extinction, which allows ai to optimize and take all the resources and land all for themselves. Without wasting time cooperating with humans.