
u/Rural_Dictionary939

Clarification about the purpose of this subreddit
I'm making this post, because I've noticed some misconceptions about this subreddit or the purpose of this subreddit.
First of all, you don't have to subscribe to "radical egalitarianism" to participate in this subreddit, or agree with it on everything.
Radical egalitarianism, depending on the perspective of the radical egalitarian, is either a form of feminism, or is a distinct ideology from feminism that borrows aspects of different branches of feminism, as well as combining this with left-wing male advocacy. I personally fall into the second camp, for example.
There are five ways you could conceptualize gender issues:
Only women are oppressed by our gender system, and if men are harmed at all, it is a mere side effect
Women are more oppressed than men by our gender system
Men and women are roughly equally oppressed by our gender system
Men are more oppressed by our gender system
Only men are oppressed by our gender system, and if women are harmed at all, it is a mere side effect
This subreddit allows perspectives 2, 3, and 4, but not perspectives 1 and 5.
Feminists would tend to agree with either perspective 1 or 2, egalitarians would tend to agree with perspective 3, and MRAs would tend to agree with either perspective 4 or 5.
Male advocates would tend to agree with either 3, 4, or 5.
This subreddit allows egalitarians, feminists, and male advocates / MRAs to participate. It's also perfectly fine to believe one sex is more oppressed/harmed by gender issues than the other.
Oppression score-keeping is more about dismissing the problems of one sex or gender, and promoting perspectives 1 and 5 on our subreddit. The "No oppression score-keeping rule" also allows for good-faith discussion of differing impacts on groups.
We're still trying to fully figure out the purpose of our subreddit. Is it a debate subreddit, a discussion subreddit, a combination of both, or something else?
We're also still trying to come to a mod consensus about what should be removed and what shouldn't.
I personally believe that this subreddit should err on the side of free speech, and just remove posts and comments that pretty clearly violate the rules.
Women are less likely to receive CPR than men. Training on manikins with breasts could help
Women are less likely to recieve CPR than men from bystanders. This is due to multiple factors, including fear of being accused of sexual assault, having more discomfort with touching a woman's chest to perform CPR, the perception that women are more "frail" than men, and being less likely to recognize that a woman is experiencing cardiac arrest, such as due to misperceptions that cardiac arrests primarily affect men.
The Supreme Court keeps abortion pill mifepristone available by telehealth
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to restrict the nationwide mailing of the abortion drug mifepristone. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that abortion is not a constitutional right in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in 2022, medication abortion continued to be available in states that banned abortion due to being shipped from states where it is legal.
A 19th century federal anti-obscenity law called the Comstock Act was invoked in Justice Thomas's dissent, and it was mentioned by both Justice Thomas and Justice Alito during 2024 oral arguments in a case about mifepristone.
According to Wikipedia, "The Comstock Act of 1873 is a series of current provisions in federal law that generally criminalize the involvement of the United States Postal Service, its officers, or a common carrier in conveying obscene matter, crime-inciting matter, or certain abortion-related matter."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comstock\_Act\_of\_1873
The Comstock Act is not enforced by the federal government regarding abortion.
Will a new flavor of capitalism replace neoliberalism, or do you think capitalism will be replaced by socialism before then?
Do you think there's going to eventually be a new flavor of capitalism that will replace neoliberalism, or do you think capitalism will be replaced by socialism before then? For example, between the 1800s and 1930s, laissez-faire was the dominant form of capitalism (in the West). Keynesianism was the dominant form between the 1930s or 1940s and 1970s or 1980s. Neoliberalism has been the dominant form since then.
Also, why didn't neoliberalism get replaced by another flavor of capitalism after 2008, unlike laissez-faire with the Great Depression and Keynesianism with the 1970s recession?
Women shouldn't have the same risks and burdens as men
Marijuana is legal recreationally in 24 U.S. states, as well as Washington D.C., the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. It is also legal medically in 16 other states and Puerto Rico.
Liechtenstein and Thailand were the most recent, in 2025.
Which countries do you think will be the next ones to legalize?
Also, which countries do you think will legalize it within the next 10 years?
This means that women can no longer be prosecuted for abortions at any stage of pregnancy, but abortions are still only legal until the gestation limit. Previously, women could sometimes be prosecuted for abortions under some circumstances under archaic laws like the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929.
This means that women can no longer be prosecuted for abortions at any stage of pregnancy, but abortions are still only legal until the gestation limit. Previously, women could sometimes be prosecuted for abortions under some circumstances under archaic laws like the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929.
This is an interactive map of states by overall abortion policy.
The seven categories states are put it are:
Most restrictive
Very restrictive
Restrictive
Some restrictions/protections
Protective
Very protective
Most protective
Idaho could be voting on a ballot initiative that could re-legalize abortion in Idaho.
Currently, abortion is only allowed in Idaho in cases of rape, incest, or if the patient's life is in danger.
A judge has temporarily blocked a law in Wyoming that bans all but very early abortions. In January 2026, more sweeping bans were struck down by the Wyoming Supreme Court, using the same rationale.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQRKL4BxrEM
Exclusive survey for the New Statesman reveals that a minority of U25 women in the UK have a positive view of men. By contrast, 72% of men in that age bracket have a positive view of women. Categorised responses include neutral, and mildly/strongly favourable/unfavourable. The journalists in this video, all women, were fairly objective and reasonable in their coverage. I was also surprised that a centre-left publication would cover this.
One thing that stands out is their discussion regarding how social media algorithms fuel misandrist hate. Apparently videos of brides getting humiliated at weddings are being blasted onto women's social media feeds. Frustratingly though, they didn't call a spade a spade, and I don't think the word misandrist was uttered once throughout the entire video. They instead more vaguely referred to "female rage" and such like.
Something that was quite vindicating was when they discussed political views amongst these groups. They dispelled the myth that young men en masse are gravitating towards Reform UK/the far right in general. They explained that young men are actually marginally more likely to vote for the Greens, but no where near to the same extent as women.
Outside of the video itself, I saw a clip of the interview reposted to the NS instagram. In response to their discussion of the survey results, Tilly Middlehurst commented underneath insinuating that the majority of men think their wives should obey them. This is a shame because I've watched some of her stuff recently and didn't think she had these misandrist attitudes. She's also a massive rising star on the left, so people with attitudes like hers filling the movement will no doubt set conversations about men's issues back slightly.
If there's one thing I'm taking away from this video it's that the boundary between social media and real-life is getting disturbingly fuzzy.
This video explains various aspects of anarcho-capitalism. They also make arguments for how the military / defense would work under anarcho-capitalism, and how how an all-private police force would work, among other things.
This video explains right-wing libertarianism, and some arguments for it, as well as some cons.
This video briefly explains right-wing libertarianism, the positions they hold, and the pros and cons of the ideology.
This is a video explaining right-wing libertarianism. Right-wing libertarianism argues for a small or minimal state, or even a stateless society, alongside laissez-faire capitalism.
This is a brief video by One Minute Economics explaining, comparing, and contrasting left-wing anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. Anarcho-capitalists think everything should be privatized and support a form of "ultra-capitalism", while left-wing anarchists oppose capitalism.
In this video, Bret Weinstein argues that left and right libertarians should unite, work together, and ally with each other against political authoritarians.