u/SPJess

Seriously this sub just talks about art.

Why?

There is so much more to actually talk about

Heres a hypothetical.

If you could get rid of all your small choices (like what you'll have for dinner, what time should you go take a walk, should you wear the red shirt or the blue shirt, etc.) By just giving the choice to AI. Where all you had to do was make big decisions, (how much money to take out of the bank, if you should spend that extra 50$ on groceries. What school you should go to when you graduate, what job would be the best fit for you etc.)

Would you do it? Would you give away all those small choices?

What effect do you think that would have? Would it make you better at making big choices? Would it affect your ability to make small choices?

Where would you personally draw the line between big and small choices?

This is a question to see who would give even a part of their autonomy to AI because they feel they dont need it. It should come with the shifting of AI becoming a negligible interaction in our everyday lives.

If you want to assign this to art, since rhats all anyone here wants to actually "debate" about. Then yes youre giving a piece of your autonomy to the AI, only making the bigger choices, what the picture is, what its supposed to mean, what colors, the general vibe. Those are bigger choices you gotta make when drawing anything(the impressive part is the person's hand being able to consistently have good line work or use the shading and lighting to add better depth, as if they were looking right the subject of their picture.)

The small stuff, like a flower in the corner thats a call back to a previous piece or acts as a signature of your own. The lines coming off the sun making a subtle symbol that holds meaning for the rest of the piece. Stuff like that. The little crap that dont matter unless some one is looking at the picture over and over again.

A bit of nuance, I understand there are skilled prompters out there and very level heads who make good use of this new tool. If this question of; "how much of your autonomy are you willing to give AI "

Isnt something that you think you do or would have to deal with then you can ignore the question

But imo it would be irresponsible as a person willingly giving away autonomy not to think of any effect it would have on them, both he good and the bad.

(*I meant fun)

Like i get why he wasnt seen much at a competitive level, the game is pretty designed to be anti "conventional grappler" with all the zoning options.

But holy crap grodd has some nasty looking combos

B3 J2 22 1+3 mb 112 BF3 mb

Two bars and like 300+ damage and thats probably a baby Grodd combo, also he seems to have forced resets?

Either way fun character,has clear flaws but damn it would have been cool to see Grodd at the height of the game played at high level. (If there are some matches you can think of feel free to send me a link)

So rhe first time i broke a card, I ended up with a pink death, then the next time i broke a card I got a blue death, and I have recently beaten red death.

How many deaths am i missing or are there different ways to get different deaths?

They essentially have the exact same powers but who wins the fight (lets say post s4 Nate vs Tony)

I wanna know yalls thoughts.

So we all know Domi Reversi gives the affected wings and horns. It gives then a crazy lust for battle and conquest.

Now I know there are probably instances of character noticing something "odd" about their allies who were DR'd but they can really see the wings and horns, they only see the new weapons and the power.

This may sound a but far fetched, but remember CoA is Not visible to the characters of the story. The same could apply to the effects of Domi Reversi.

I do think those who have experienced "Maki" can see Domi Reversi but thats about as much as I have.

TL;DR

Domi Reversi is like Armament Haki it is invisible to the characters for the most part.

So i decided to go back through the flash. Since I dropp3d it around s7 and just jumping in at s6 is like impossible to do unless you remember who everyone is.

That being said. Iris does nothing but cause fabricated tension through her entire time in S1 which was the season she was supposed to show the kind of character she was.

Hip, cool, down to earth, doesnt like lying.

This just makes her absolutely insufferable she just gets angry and comes in and causes issue among the team. There are even points where you can tell the characters are thinking "are we really doing this right now?"

I think it starts when she starts to get mad at Eddy. Everything after that just cements her as unlikable through the rest of the season until she finds out who Barry is, when she spends like 15 minutes just being angry at everyone and lashing accusations

Now I know Iris becomes a more focal character and these are meant to be like her beginnings with team flash. She doesnt always stat insufferable, she just becomes... a way to cause fabricated tension through her playing the opposition to the groups ideas. ​

And ofc theres the very iconic fight between Iris and Barry over Nora being a student of Thawne. And the infamous "we are the flash"

Ngl after not watching the series for a long time I forgot why i disliked Iris. But going back through S1.. yeah she is definitely kind of annoying.

Thank you for reading this

I dont "hate" Iris just i very much dislike how her character is written