How does diagnosis usually go?
I was diagnosed with depression 2 weeks ago because I've been dealing with the symptoms for a month before that. A week after taking SNRI, I started feeling better but in a way that I had a surge of physical energy first, but I still felt depressed. 2 days after I felt energized, mental clarity finally came with it, but I eventually ended up feeling mentally scattered.
I told the doctor on my second visit that I remember myself being depressed and mentally weak, but I also remember myself being mentally resilient, optimistic and confident in a way that I was productive and felt I could do anything. That's when the suspicion of bipolar started. They then prescribed me Lamictal (25mg)for a week and made me stop taking. SNRI. My 3rd visit, I was simply told to keep taking it and observe myself. This time, the doctor said if I "get better" then that means I'm bipolar. But when I asked what exactly does "getting better mean" (because if it's for depression then I'm definitely more functional and energetic now but that started after taking SNRI for a week, before I started lamictal). I was simply told to just observe myself and not make judgements by myself. I was a little confused to that answer. I'm don't know if I'm being too paranoid but I don't really trust this doctor. (the doctor I see is different each visit. The clinic seems to be on a rotation system)
To those who are diagnosed with bipolar i/ii, how did your diagnosis go? What did you or your doctor do to confirm it? Is simply forcing this medicine on me really a solid method of diagnosis? I find it a little weird. They never tried to ask me more about my past or even my family history--this is something my therapist noted when I told her about the bipolar suspicion. She was wondering why they didn't ask me more.
I live in Japan, btw.