u/Shot-Equipment7312

Even with the spiderman movie where we've seen he appears, new merch has come out but is all kind of off.

Not a controversy post, just opinions.

https://preview.redd.it/58wodi37kh8h1.png?width=498&format=png&auto=webp&s=d1b5e1039f6583a0b7d38d738b604ab79e5921ce

Morality is very complex. Just as we all know what is good and bad, we can perfectly well have different beliefs about what is good and what is bad.

To some people is normal to have children without necessarily being married, that in another country would create a disadvantage for the woman and the child; it's seen as wrong and even immature. But it's simply the environment where it's normalized.

Someone religious might see both things as immoral because of their religion, and someone more aligned with purity culture would believe the same, but at the end of the day, the idea of ​​good and evil is very globalized on the planet. If you harm someone in any way, it's labeled as bad, which is true.

Now, clearly this is not a crime or so bad as killing as Omniman did, but what about Mark.

But what if there's a child isolated from a society where killing a bad person is normalized? Let's say two wrongs make a right. To anyone else, that sounds immoral, but it's their culture. I'm saying this because of everyone's perception of Mark, they think he should just kill and not resist. So, would that make him bad? For many, no, because if someone kills a bad person, what's really lost? Nothing. So, is Mark good or bad?

Yes Omniman killed random people and Mark till now, has barely kill people but they dont believe in the same things.

Omniman comes from ANOTHER PLANET with different beliefs. As I already said, he's bad for Earthlings, and that's understandable; I never said otherwise. But being inherently bad, when Viltrum's idea is to create "Balance" in the universe, their ideas are different from Earth's.

Earth's morality isn't universal for all planets. Everyone has their own idea of ​​what's right and wrong, as long as it's the globalized idea of ​​their home.

The fact that he's repenting is because he adopted Earth's ideas and mixed his Earthly ideals with Viltrum's, and ended up being a traitor to both.

He's bad for Earth in terms of Earth's morals, and they have a right to feel resentful, CLEARLY. In Viltrum, he was loyal and adhered to his moral code, making him a good soldier.

He mixed both beliefs and ended up being a traitor.

Ideals in the fictional world of Invincible vary from planet to planet. Those on Earth are considered good for having their own ideals, as are the Thraxans who are very different and act different.

Depending on the perspective of whoever is watching, he is seen as bad, good, or confused about which ideal to follow.

But if we consider his perspective, he isn't bad; he believes himself to be bad for violating the morals of another planet to which he tried to adapt.

At first I didn't like Karen because she was only a love interest character, but she deserves to be more of a character than JUST a love interest. Writers and fans should see her as a person, not choosing who she looks best with as a girlfriend.

It took them three seasons to finally show Karen's backstory, I hate this idea that writers don't see the potential in her character to be more determined but it seems to late to even change her personality now.

They make her seem like this irrational woman who has no accountability for her actions, being a cliche for "The Decorative Secretary" or "The Ditz" so they have made her just a pretty girl with a gun, we see her care more about her love interest's feelings than her own. Randomly fights with Matt about having no morals but justifying Frank's actions. Got Ben Urich killed all because she didn't want to be more careful and he stilled warn her.

I still don't get why a character like hers is still around, apparently Foggy wasn't supposed to die and he died so Karen wouldn't. Foggy should be alive and Karen was supposed to be killed by bullseye at the church.

The only character development she got was in the Born Again series is that she is the "Strong Woman" trope, only because she thinks that she should be good at the things that the men that she surrounds herself with are good at.

I think she will PROBABLY die just to give Matt or Frank more character development.

I feel like she could been more but her character is just annoying now.

https://preview.redd.it/b14l60quoi7h1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=5c763f3edd3527e194b6895c9ffe4d7f5ab2dcdd

https://preview.redd.it/olyde59voi7h1.png?width=815&format=png&auto=webp&s=3c517f78d4b70166e1d27c2e14dcdae21a57dc58

You've notice how Butcher has MM and the Punisher has Curtis. Both black friend is tired of the more protagonist character but always comes back and forms part of their plans.

They are both with the white more protagonist character that they helped but they are very toxic so they try to leave the characters like butcher and punisher behind but again and again they come back to helped them.

They are the more morally and grounded friends, and also being a form of inclusivism for the story, that being POC (Mental health and Body prosthesis)

Both show remorse for Butcher and the Punisher

https://preview.redd.it/dftkfrhucy6h1.png?width=1417&format=png&auto=webp&s=ef6b5c301edcc4493fd6b883c3007ad9a00eb927