Iowa's Proposed Tax Amendment is Really on Handcuff on our Future
▲ 142 r/50501ContentCorner+1 crossposts

Iowa's Proposed Tax Amendment is Really on Handcuff on our Future

This fall, Iowans vote on a constitutional amendment requiring a 2/3 supermajority to change income tax rates. Capping income tax flexibility is a "constitutional handcuff" and shifts the financial burden straight onto local property taxes (or 'regressive' sales taxes).

Limiting state revenue doesn't eliminate costs—it just forces a reliance on unfair sales taxes or pushes the financial burden directly onto local property taxes to fund rural public schools and local hospitals open.

Saying "no" isn't about wanting higher taxes; it's about being pro-community.

Earlier, I wrote this on substack https://ralphrosenberg.substack.com/p/the-tax-amendment-iowa-candidates?r=9e9e3&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

u/SkyBig952 — 4 days ago
▲ 6 r/Iowa

Non-citizen voting and use of federal dollars and limited resources

If HSI investigators are being diverted from transnational crime to investigate noncitizen voting, what happens to the investigations they were previously conducting?

I just finished reading an article in Pro Publica. Unprecedented Effort to Prosecute Noncitizen Voters Fell Apart https://www.propublica.org/article/noncitizen-voting-trump-homeland-security-investigations I do recommend Pro Publica.

I'm particularly interested in whether anyone has seen data on the opportunity cost of decreased resources on drug cartels, fentanyl trafficking, human trafficking, money laundering, terrorism, etc. Has anyone studied whether shifting federal investigative resources toward immigration enforcement affects those investigations?

reddit.com
u/SkyBig952 — 6 days ago
▲ 110 r/Iowa

Don't be Gaslight into Supporting the Tax Amendment

Today's piece by Ed Tibbetts is worthwhile for its emphasis that the Iowa Proposed Amendment 1 doesn't lock in low taxes; it locks in whose taxes rise next--unfairly on the backs of working-class and low-income Iowans..

Once income tax is supermajority-proof (under the amendment), the sales tax becomes the primary lever left — meaning future roads (gas tax), Medicaid shortfalls, school funding, or disaster/flood relief are all financed by consumption taxes, hitting working-class and lower-income earners hardest while the wealthy stay protected.

https://open.substack.com/pub/edtibbetts/p/dont-be-gaslit-into-believing-iowas?r=9e9e3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

u/SkyBig952 — 22 days ago
▲ 304 r/Iowa

‘Cancer Doesn't Care What Party You Belong To’: Poisoned Water Is Turning This Rural State Bluer

I spent years fighting for clean water and public health in Iowa, so it's refreshing to see a candidate who's hitting the sweet spot, even in today's ag dominated Iowa. Chris Jones isn't just talking about water quality/clean water—he's making it central to Iowa's future as a candidate for Secretary of Agriculture. If you get the chance to meet him, he's the real deal. This is compelling case for why this issue can no longer be ignored. And if a candidate does not mention it on a campaign trail, ask them, take them to task

politi.co
u/SkyBig952 — 1 month ago
▲ 500 r/50501ContentCorner+1 crossposts

Plans to replace state income taxes with higher sales taxes will help the rich and hurt the rest of us

Reliance on sales tax hurts us for generations, and candidates are silent from Rob Sand down. Sales tax sounds fair, while working Iowans spend more of their income just living—meaning we pay a far bigger share than the wealthy. It leaves our kids holding the bag.

open.substack.com
u/SkyBig952 — 1 month ago
▲ 29 r/ames+1 crossposts

Before the Data Center Arrives: Questions Iowa Communities Might Want to Ask

Ames is weighing a 25 MW data center on airport land. Iowa's got 32 of these now, 11 more coming. Before any council signs off, some questions worth asking — who owns the company, is "clean energy" real or just credits, who pays if the grid needs upgrading.https://open.substack.com/pub/ralphrosenberg/p/before-the-data-center-arrives-questions?r=9e9e3&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

u/SkyBig952 — 1 month ago
▲ 8 r/50501ContentCorner+1 crossposts

Why Do Americans Keep Falling for This Scam?

Political scams. Writer names a three-stage long con perfectly: absolute promise → quiet redefinition → retroactive victory lap. Four players keep it running: the con man making the promise, the recipients (the public), the media chasing the next shiny thing instead of the receipts, and political leaders who flinch from calling a lie a lie. Most of us aren't in the con. But we're obligated to hold the media accountable and demand our leaders grow a spine. Silence is a fifth player

open.substack.com
u/SkyBig952 — 2 months ago
▲ 9 r/evolutionReddit+1 crossposts

The Administration's Assault on the Civil Rights Community

if you agree with this piece by Joyce Vance, please let me know what you think of which acronym we should use to describe vindictive prosecution

BULLY — five letters, straightforward:

  • Bureaucratic
  • Undermining of
  • Law through
  • Lies and
  • Yoking (of opponents)

:

REIGN

  • Retaliatory
  • Enforcement
  • Intimidation
  • Governing through
  • Nightmare prosecution

 FARCE:

  • Fear-based
  • Authoritarian
  • Retribution,
  • Coercion, and
  • Extortion
open.substack.com
u/SkyBig952 — 2 months ago
▲ 43 r/Iowa

Chris Jones argues the plan forces taxpayers to foot the bill for pollution while demanding zero accountability from big-ag corporations. Instead of "throwing good money after bad" on edge-of-field fixes, Jones advocates for a shift to a "low-input" system with diverse crops like oats and alfalfa. For him, it’s time to stop treating symptoms and start addressing the root causes of Iowa's water crisis.

u/SkyBig952 — 4 months ago