u/SoloTiger_

I got tired of outbound being the same AI generated text over and over again.

So I built a tool where you record yourself once, and for every prospect it generates completely new personalized script and a new video of you delivering it.

Not just lip-syncing a template or changing a few words. The entire message is regenerated based on the person and company, and the final video is designed to look indistinguishable from one you actually sat down and recorded yourself.

It researches the prospect, writes what you should say, generates the video with your face and voice, then sends it as part of the outreach sequence.

Basically: personalized founder/sales videos at the scale of automated email.

Curious what people here think, genuinely useful for outbound, or still too gimmicky?

I got tired of outbound being the same AI generated text over and over again.

So I built a tool where you record yourself once, and for every prospect it generates completely new personalized script and a new video of you delivering it.

Not just lip-syncing a template or changing a few words. The entire message is regenerated based on the person and company, and the final video is designed to look indistinguishable from one you actually sat down and recorded yourself.

It researches the prospect, writes what you should say, generates the video with your face and voice, then sends it as part of the outreach sequence.

Basically: personalized founder/sales videos at the scale of automated email.

Curious what people here think, genuinely useful for outbound, or still too gimmicky?

I build an AI video outreach tool. I have never hired an SDR. Every customer we have came from me pointing the product at my own pipeline and living with whatever it did.

That is an uncomfortable place to sit, because my ICP is heads of sales, SDR managers, and founders running their own outbound. These are the exact people who can smell a template from the subject line. If the video is stiff or the opener is generic, they do not just ignore it, they screenshot it and post it here.

Last week the loop finally produced a number worth writing up: 52 meetings booked.

The funnel

Contacts worked: 1,842
Touches sent: 3,110 across email and LinkedIn
Replies: 214 (11.6%)
Positive replies: 78
Meetings booked: 52
Of those, 35 have happened: 31 held, 4 no-shows, 17 still on the calendar

Our normal week is 8 to 12. I do not think 52 is the new baseline. I think 25 to 30 is, and I will post again in a month with whether that held.

Why dogfooding changes what you build

When you sell an outbound tool and do not use it, you optimize for the demo. Dashboards, charts, a settings page with forty toggles. When the replies land in your own inbox, you optimize for the only thing that decides whether a stranger books time with you, which is the first five seconds.

Four things I only learned because I was the one getting the responses:

1. Every script sounded like the same person wrote it. Technically they were all personalized. Different company, different role, different opening fact. But the rhythm was identical across all 1,800, and once you notice it you cannot unnotice it. Nobody replies to tell you this. They just stop replying. I rebuilt the generator so the sentence structure varies, not only the nouns.
2. The opener has to be something they know I could not have guessed. Not “I saw you’re hiring SDRs.” That is public and reads as scraped. Closer to “you posted two SDR roles and an enablement role in the same month, which usually means the problem is ramp time, not headcount.” The inference is the personalization. The fact is just the setup.
3. Video length. Anything past 40 seconds and replies roughly halved. My best performer is 28 seconds. I kept wanting to explain the product and the product is not what gets the meeting.
4. No calendar link in the first touch. Asking a question outperformed asking for time by a wide margin, and the people who answered the question booked anyway when I sent the link in the reply.

What flopped outright

Video on a LinkedIn touch before the connection is accepted. Dead every time.

Monday 8am sends. Tuesday to Thursday, 10am to 2pm local, roughly doubled replies.

Openers starting with “Hope you’re well” or “Quick question.” Under 3% reply rate.

Going wider. I ran a looser second list of 900 contacts mid-week and it returned 4 meetings. The tight list returned 48 off 1,842.

The part I would not have believed a year ago

The tool is maybe 30% of this. The list filter and the first line are the other 70%. You could take the exact same product, point it at a bad list, and book nothing. I know because I did that to myself for months.

This is my own pipeline, not a customer case study, and I am not linking it here. If you want the sequence structure or the actual scripts I will paste them in the comments, and they work with whatever you are already sending from.

Ask me anything about the funnel, the list build, or the failures. The failure list is longer than the win list and I am happy to go through all of it.

I build an AI video outreach tool. I have never hired an SDR. Every customer we have came from me pointing the product at my own pipeline and living with whatever it did.

That is an uncomfortable place to sit, because my ICP is heads of sales, SDR managers, and founders running their own outbound. These are the exact people who can smell a template from the subject line. If the video is stiff or the opener is generic, they do not just ignore it, they screenshot it and post it here.

Last week the loop finally produced a number worth writing up: 52 meetings booked.

The funnel

Contacts worked: 1,842
Touches sent: 3,110 across email and LinkedIn
Replies: 214 (11.6%)
Positive replies: 78
Meetings booked: 52
Of those, 35 have happened: 31 held, 4 no-shows, 17 still on the calendar

Our normal week is 8 to 12. I do not think 52 is the new baseline. I think 25 to 30 is, and I will post again in a month with whether that held.

Why dogfooding changes what you build

When you sell an outbound tool and do not use it, you optimize for the demo. Dashboards, charts, a settings page with forty toggles. When the replies land in your own inbox, you optimize for the only thing that decides whether a stranger books time with you, which is the first five seconds.

Four things I only learned because I was the one getting the responses:

1. Every script sounded like the same person wrote it. Technically they were all personalized. Different company, different role, different opening fact. But the rhythm was identical across all 1,800, and once you notice it you cannot unnotice it. Nobody replies to tell you this. They just stop replying. I rebuilt the generator so the sentence structure varies, not only the nouns.
2. The opener has to be something they know I could not have guessed. Not “I saw you’re hiring SDRs.” That is public and reads as scraped. Closer to “you posted two SDR roles and an enablement role in the same month, which usually means the problem is ramp time, not headcount.” The inference is the personalization. The fact is just the setup.
3. Video length. Anything past 40 seconds and replies roughly halved. My best performer is 28 seconds. I kept wanting to explain the product and the product is not what gets the meeting.
4. No calendar link in the first touch. Asking a question outperformed asking for time by a wide margin, and the people who answered the question booked anyway when I sent the link in the reply.

What flopped outright

Video on a LinkedIn touch before the connection is accepted. Dead every time.

Monday 8am sends. Tuesday to Thursday, 10am to 2pm local, roughly doubled replies.

Openers starting with “Hope you’re well” or “Quick question.” Under 3% reply rate.

Going wider. I ran a looser second list of 900 contacts mid-week and it returned 4 meetings. The tight list returned 48 off 1,842.

The part I would not have believed a year ago

The tool is maybe 30% of this. The list filter and the first line are the other 70%. You could take the exact same product, point it at a bad list, and book nothing. I know because I did that to myself for months.

Disclosure up front rather than buried: the tool is Outvid and I built it. This is my own pipeline, not a customer case study, and I am not linking it here. If you want the sequence structure or the actual scripts I will paste them in the comments, and they work with whatever you are already sending from.

Ask me anything about the funnel, the list build, or the failures. The failure list is longer than the win list and I am happy to go through all of it.

I’m building in the AI sales space and I keep coming back to one question: does personalized video materially improve reply rates, or does text still win because it is faster to consume?

The workflow I’m testing is:

You record yourself once, then AI researches each prospect, writes a relevant message and creates a unique video using their company context. The outreach can then continue across email, LinkedIn, WhatsApp and Instagram.

The theory is that video builds more trust and helps outreach stand out. The concern is that prospects may see AI-generated video as less authentic, or simply not want to watch it.

For people running outbound today:

Have personalized videos actually improved replies or booked meetings for you?

At what stage do they work best: first touch, follow-up, demo recap or re-engagement?

Would you trust an AI-personalized video from a founder or sales rep, provided it was clearly based on real research?

I’m especially interested in honest criticism from people who have tested video outreach at scale.