▲ 56 r/printSF

Recommondations for serious first contact novels with unique well-thought out aliens from the last 25 years

Looking for something like Rememberance of Earths Past, Blindsight without the vampires, the Southern Reach series, Sevenesses- looking for a serious tone and dialogue, so please *no fantasy at all and nothing like Project Hail Mary or Dungeon Crawler Carl or The Expanse*

Original aliens is a must! Please no necromancers, vampires, or aliens that are AI/based on animals from earth/hive-mind/Crabs etc. The aliens from The Sparrow is not what im looking for. The octopuses from Mountain in the Sea is not what im looking for. Something totally unique and un-human like the Trisolarians or the Southern Reach.

I really want to be immersed in a believable world with rational actors who communicate like regular people and aliens that surprise me. Thank you so much!

reddit.com
u/SpotIsALie — 3 days ago
▲ 41 r/toners

Two Rainbow Textile Toned Morgans

Testing new camera out, figured it post two cool Morgans. Other sides are boring. Both straight graded before anyone asks.

u/SpotIsALie — 20 days ago
▲ 0 r/canon

Need help on lens for macro product photography, please help!

Hi all,

I am having a very tough time figuring out what lens to get for the specific purpose of photographing coins. I am planning on getting either the R8 or the newer version coming out in a few months as my old t6s is basically broken.

Today I used my old T6S and tried using my 50 1.4mm as well as a low end 24-105 (not the L) and both were pretty bad- they werent focusing properly and I could never zoom in enough- when I tried bringing my camera closer to the subject neither of the lenses were focusing properly, AF doesnt work on either so I was doing MF.

I want to be able to zoom up close to the coin so the coin takes up the entire image. Im concerned the always mentioned 100mm L will be limiting in this factor + it simply does not zoom in enough as when I was using my 24-105 I kept trying to zoom more and was not able to. Obviously ny t6s is a low end body and the lens is cropped but I was not able to zoom in at all. The 50mm was even worse- I am not able to get close and at 50mm the coin just looks small.

I have extensive experience with nightlife videography/concerts and this is totally out of my wheelhouse. I dont understand why people online are recommending the 50mm or a 35mm when those are lenses I would use for portraits, NOT macro photography. Why would people recommend these? Isnt a 35mm almost a wide lens? Wouldnt the best option be a nicer version of something like the 50-200mm kit lens?

Ive been out of the game for a while and my T6S is basically falling apart so maybe its the camera, but if I could get any assistance I would really appreciate it. I can spend around 1.5k on a lens.

reddit.com
u/SpotIsALie — 1 month ago

Are these opalied wood?

Saw these at a coin show and figured id grab a few. I beleive they are from 50 Million years ago from Montana. Not sure if they are in fact opalied (thats what I was told) or just petrified or what the difference is. Opals I have seen seem to be much more colorful.

u/SpotIsALie — 1 month ago
▲ 16 r/coins

Rainbow (reverse) Toned Morgan, recent pickup

Really lovely reverse toned Morgan I recently aquired. Looks PL but not designated as so. Guess the grade!

u/SpotIsALie — 1 month ago

Rainbow textile toned Morgan Dollar I recently picked up

​

Great neon colors, fully toned obverse. Boring reverse.

u/SpotIsALie — 1 month ago
▲ 39 r/Silverbugs+1 crossposts

A few of my naturally rainbow toned Morgan Silver Dollars

[deleted]

u/SpotIsALie — 2 months ago

[Negative] Scammer Impersonater u/mugsy420420

Hey all, a new PMS user, u/SilentInterest7767 reached out to me after u/mugsy420420 responded to his WTB thread using my photos from an old WTS post of mine.

​

Please note that these scammers are targeting new users. The impersonator did not post a comment on SilentInterests post and messaged him directly- im assuming hes already on the ban list but this is a great reminder to never respond to any DMs unless someone posts a comment on your thread.

​

The scammer also forgot to remove my custom handpour with my username that I use on my proof pics- these little details are extremley important and you must do your due dilligence.

​

Proof: https://imgur.com/a/NqzOHTD

u/SpotIsALie — 2 months ago
▲ 11 r/toners

1899-O Rainbow Toned Morgan

Really like this one, one of the most unique toners in my collection.

u/SpotIsALie — 2 months ago
▲ 14 r/coins

1891 Seated Liberty Quarter

Looks much nicer in person, nice bit of toning on obverse as well.

u/SpotIsALie — 3 months ago

[WTB] High end vivid rainbow toned Morgans or other graded pre-64 coins

Hello, looking for a graded MS62-66, PCGS, NGC, ANACS, or CAC. No details grade. Vivid color toning taking up most of the coin or deep crescents, so no black or browns or rim toners. Paying via Venmo, new or low flair users would need to ship first or we can use a verified middleman and I can cover fees. Must send pics and prices (please dont message me asking for an offer). Common dates only. Thank you!

Potentially also interested in other US coins (Peace Dollar, Merc Dime, Wheat Penny, Franklin etc.), nothing modern, must be graded and must have significant vivid rainbow toning. Same grade requirements as above.

Examples of what im looking for to not waste time: https://imgur.com/a/yA5YzW1

u/SpotIsALie — 3 months ago

Im reading book 2 of Southern Reach Trilogy, page 206-207. Author details the numbering conventions of the expedition but to me it looks like the math is incorrect and its making me go crazy:

"The Southern Reach called the last expedition the twelfth, but Control had counted the rings, and it was actually the thirty-eighth iteration, including six "eleventh" expeditions.

The hagiography was clear: After the true fifth expedi- tion, the Southern Reach had gotten stuck like a jammed CD, with nearly the same repetitions. Expedition 5 became X.5.A, followed by X.5.B and X.5.C, all the way to an X.5.G. Each expedition number thereafter adhered to a particular set of metrics and introduced variables into the equation with each letter. For example, the eleventh expedition series had been composed of all men, while the twelfth, if it continued to X.12.B and beyond, would continue to be com posed of all women. He woridered if his mother knew of any parallel in special ops, if secret studies showed something about gender that escaped him in considering the irrelevance of this particular metric. And what about someone who doesnt 't identify as male or female?

did Control still couldn't tell from his examination of the records that morning if rations had started as a clerical error and become codified as process (un- the iterati likely) or been initiated as a conscious decision by the director, sneakily enacted the iterations ow the radar of any meeting minutes. It had just popped up as if always there. A need to somehow act as if they weren't as far along without concrete results or answers. Or the need to describe a story arc for each set of expeditions that didn't give away how futile it was fast becoming.

During the fifth, too, the Southern Reach had started lying to the partici- pants. No one was ever told they were part of Expedition 7.F or 8.G or 9.B. and Control wondered how anyone had kept it straight, and how the truth might have raten away at morale rather than buoyed it, brought into the Southern Reach a kind of cynical fatalism. How peculiar to keep prepping the "fifth" expedition, to keep rolling this stone up this hill, over and over.

Grace had just shrugged when asked about the transition from X.11.K to X.12.A during orientation on Monday, which already felt a month away from Wednesday."

How is this possible/correct? At the beginning author states there were 6 11th exepiditions, meaning it would end at X.11.F and then on the next page states the 11th grouping ends in K which would be the 11th number of the 11th expidition.

Further it states that X.12.A is the 38th expidition but how is this possible given the numbers? Assuming X.6 and X.10 only had 1 expidition the total number would be the 40th expidition? And why would they only have one iteration for 6 and 10? Am I crazy? Heres my math:

1 (1)

2 (1)

3 (1)

4 (1)

5 A B C D E F G (7)

6 A (1)

7 A B C D E F (6)

8 A B C D E F G (7)

9 A B (2)

10 A (1)

11 A B C D E F G H I J K (11) NOT 6, otherwise it would be F

12 A (1)

reddit.com
u/SpotIsALie — 4 months ago