Moderna just showed the market what a Keytruda combination is worth. DRTS is doing the same!
▲ 121 r/DRTS_Stock+1 crossposts

Moderna just showed the market what a Keytruda combination is worth. DRTS is doing the same!

I woke up to Moderna doubling its market cap, adding over 25 Billion dollars to its worth. The reason: their mRNA melanoma vaccine paired with Keytruda beat Keytruda alone in a Phase 3 trial. Recurrence and metastasis risk both dropped significantly. Market reaction was immediate and brutal in the best way, tens of billions added to Moderna's valuation even before the open.

That's what happens when a combination therapy with Keytruda actually works in a real trial. Merck's drug is approved in more than 40 cancer indications and pharma companies have spent years trying to find partners that meaningfully improve on it. When one does, the market doesn't wait around to price it in.

Alpha Tau ($DRTS) is running the same playbook, and most people haven't noticed yet.

At AHNS in July, Alpha Tau presented mature data from the Hadassah combination trial: Alpha DaRT plus pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in elderly head and neck cancer patients. A 100% objective response rate and 18.2 month median overall survival, both clearing the study's pre-specified bar for success. The lead investigator at Hadassah said he wasn't aware of any other pembrolizumab combination study that had put up numbers like that in this population.

And now Alpha Tau is in active discussions with the FDA about running a larger multi center US trial of the same combination. That's the same regulatory conversation Moderna just proved is worth having. A positive Keytruda combination signal is one of the more valuable things a company can bring to that table, because it opens the door to a much bigger addressable population than any single indication on its own.

Different tumor types, different mechanism, but the underlying thesis is identical: pair with the best selling immunotherapy on the planet, show you make it work better, and let the market figure out what that's worth.

Moderna just got that repricing in a single morning. Alpha Tau is still trading like nobody's looked at the data yet.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 day ago
▲ 54 r/DRTS_Stock+1 crossposts

Curious if anyone has thoughts about DRTS (Alpha Tau Medical).

I’ve been researching the company quite a bit lately, and the more I read, the more interested I get. I’d really like to hear from people who understand the science better than I do.

From what I’ve seen, Alpha DaRT seems like a really unique technology with the potential to be used in multiple solid tumors if future trials go well. I’m also starting to believe if DRTS could eventually become a successful standalone company rather than just being bought out.

I’d like to get opinions here because i believe I’ll get opinions on from both people that believe in it and don’t so I’d genuinely like to hear both the bull and bear case. What do you think the market is getting right or wrong about DRTS?

reddit.com
u/Ok_Leading_2669 — 13 days ago

Merck reports Q2 earnings today. Curious how others here are thinking about what it means for DRTS

For anyone who missed it, Alpha Tau (DRTS) put up strong data at AHNS a couple weeks back. Alpha DaRT plus Keytruda in advanced head and neck cancer, 100% objective response rate across nine evaluable patients versus a historical benchmark of about 19% for pembro alone, and median overall survival of 18.2 months versus 12.3 months historical. Podium presentation, beat the study's own pre-specified bar.

Merck's call is at 9am ET today. Keytruda is the number everyone will watch, and every quarter Merck talks more about extending its life through combination regimens ahead of the 2028 patent cliff. Head and neck is a setting where pembro alone has never been great, which is exactly the gap Alpha Tau's data is aimed at.

I don't expect Merck to say Alpha Tau's name on the call, there's no formal partnership so that would be unusual. But the strategic backdrop keeps lining up. A checkpoint inhibitor giant publicly hunting for combination data, and a small company that just produced a number like that in a hard-to-treat population, feels like something worth paying attention to even without a direct mention.

Genuinely asking, not just posting my own take. Anyone here have a read on how Merck typically handles BD conversations for combination data like this, or know if there's any prior contact between Merck and Alpha Tau. Also curious if anyone's tracking how the stock trades once Keytruda's actual number comes out this morning. Small trial, nine patients, so I know there's a long way between a podium talk and a partnership, but I'd rather have eyes on this than not.

Position: long DRTS. Not financial advice, just trying to think this through with the group.

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 16 days ago
▲ 83 r/DRTS_Stock+1 crossposts

DRTS close to its biggest IDE yet, and the stock just gave you a discount to get in

I want to focus on what I think is the real catalyst here. DRTS just wrapped a study combining Alpha DaRT with Keytruda in head and neck cancer patients, and it hit a 100% objective response rate (4 complete responses and 5 partial responses out of 9 evaluable patients) with median overall survival of 18.2 months. The trial met its prespecified success threshold and enrollment is already complete. Yes, nine patients is a small sample size, but in oncology, jumping from a roughly 19% historical response rate to 100%, and extending survival from 12.3 months to 18.2 months in a frail population, is a massive signal.

In the last press release, CEO Uzi Sofer directly addressed what comes next. He said the company is exploring, in his words, the idea of "a similar but larger study" done in the US, and that these talks are already happening with the FDA. That is about as clear a signal as you are going to get from a CEO without them just announcing the filing outright.

In my read that points toward a new IDE for a larger pembrolizumab combination study, and this would be the most important one this company has filed. Every prior IDE here opened a small feasibility study. This one would be building on data that already blew past the historical Keytruda monotherapy benchmark. Head and neck cancer is roughly 890,000 new cases a year worldwide, so a bigger trial approved on the back of numbers like that would move this from a small early study into a real pipeline asset with genuine commercial potential.

Now here is the part that makes the timing interesting to me. DRTS closed yesterday at 11.55, down from the low 14s just last week, even after that data came out. So you have what I think is the most significant IDE this company has ever pursued potentially coming, and the stock has cooled off instead of running up. That is the setup I want to see: strong data already banked, a much bigger trial likely on the way, and a price that gives some room before the next catalyst instead of already pricing it in.

None of this is guaranteed and small cap biotech can move fast in both directions, but if that IDE comes through, I think the gap between where the stock sits now and where it could reprice to is significant.

Curious if anyone else is seeing this too and if anyone has a sense of timing on when the FDA might respond.

Not financial advice, just my own research and opinion.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 22 days ago

Lifeward get to know the products - skelable upper body exoskeleton

This one's a little different from the last two since it's not even on the market yet, but it's worth understanding because it's a real piece of the future pipeline.

Back in February 2026, lifeward signed a deal to acquire the technology, IP, and prototypes from an Israeli company called Skelable. total consideration is up to $500,000, with $480,000 paid in lifeward stock across milestone based installments and $20,000 in cash at closing. cheap deal for what they're getting.

Skelable is a powered exoskeleton for the upper body, meaning arms and hands, with AI built in. It's designed to assist functional movement and restore function in people with weakened or paralyzed arms and hands, mainly stroke survivors. Think of it as rewalk's cousin, but instead of helping someone walk again, this one helps someone use their arm and hand again for everyday tasks they otherwise couldn't do alone.

Market for the Skelable in the US alone, there are around 245,000 people who are newly diagnosed with stroke related upper limb impairment every year, and of the more than 7 million stroke survivors total, roughly two thirds remain disabled, which adds up to about 4.6 million people who could be candidates for this kind of device. That's a massive pool of potential patients that lifeward currently has zero presence in.

Skelable fits so well with what LFWDalready do. The same doctors who prescribe rewalk, like physical medicine and rehab physicians, neurologists, and stroke specialists, are the exact same people who would prescribe this device, so lifeward doesn't need to build a new sales channel from scratch. same reps, same relationships, new product to sell into them.

The deal brought over the Skelable engineering team, with more than 60 years of combined experience across electrical, software, mechanical, and industrial design, so this isn't just buying a patent and a prototype sitting in a drawer, it's buying the people who know how to actually finish building it.

Timeline and risk: on the Q4 2025 earnings call, management reaffirmed the device is expected to be ready for commercial launch in roughly 18 to 24 months, pending further development and regulatory clearance. The regulatory pathway is expected to be 510(k) exempt, which if it holds is a faster and cheaper road to market than a full FDA clearance process. worth noting nothing is guaranteed here, timelines can slip, and 510(k) exempt status isn't locked in until FDA actually treats it that way.

Skelable isn't revenue yet, it's optionality. a cheap, capital efficient bet that turns lifeward from a lower body mobility company into a whole body neuro rehab company, with a built in sales channel and a multi million person addressable market.

nfa dyor (ai assisted post)

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

Lifeward get to know the products - AlterG

Next one in the series, breaking down AlterG for anyone in $LFWD who wants the plain version.

AlterG is an antigravity treadmill. Sounds like sci-fi, but the underlying idea is incredibly practical. You zip into a pair of specialized shorts that lock into an air filled chamber surrounding the lower half of your body. The machine pumps air into that chamber to uniformly lift you, taking pressure off your lower extremities. It can reduce gravitational load down to 20 percent of your total body weight in precise 1 percent increments, letting a physical therapist dial in exactly how much support a patient needs.

Where it came from is a great detail: the underlying tech, called Differential Air Pressure, was originally developed for NASA to help astronauts maintain bone density and muscle mass in zero gravity environments. It was reverse engineered for terrestrial clinical use, which is a fantastic backstory.

Currently, it is used in over 6000 facilities worldwide. You will find them anywhere from elite pro sports training rooms used heavily in the Premier League, NBA, and NFL to local physical therapy clinics treating everyday patients. Elite athletes use it to rehab injuries faster or pack on training volume without joint impact, while patients managing neurological or orthopedic conditions use it for safe, fall risk free gait training.

When you compare it to alternatives like hydrotherapy pools or overhead harness systems, AlterG stands out because the unweighting is completely uniform. It does not distort a person's natural mechanics, which is vital in rehab because the goal is to relearn normal movement patterns, not modified ones. Plus, it skips the massive footprint, plumbing overhead, and high maintenance costs of physical therapy pools.

The mid to high tier systems also come with real time gait analytics tracking symmetry, cadence, and step length and live video monitoring built in. Therapists can see exactly what is happening with a stride on a 21 inch screen and make objective adjustments on the fly.

From a business standpoint, Lifeward has tiered the current lineup nicely to capture the entire market:

NEO: The entry point. Launched to bring core AlterG DAP technology down to a price point smaller, budget conscious clinics can actually afford. You get the same fundamental unweighting tech, just without the higher end monitoring extras.

NEO+: The mid tier and probably the sweet spot for most clinics. Adds live video monitoring and real time gait analytics, tracking symmetry, cadence, and step length, on top of the core NEO platform. This is the tier that gives therapists the data and visual feedback loop to make objective adjustments mid session.

PRO: The top of the line, built for extreme speeds and elite performance training. This is what you see in pro sports training rooms and Olympic level facilities. Built to handle serious training volume and higher speeds.

AlterG is not a niche gadget, it is an established, widely adopted recovery standard with NASA pedigree, real clinical backing, and a tiered commercial strategy built to protect its position as the category leader.

Not financial advice. Just tracking the tech.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

Lifeward get to know the products - ReWalk

Quick rundown for anyone holding $LFWD who doesn't have a medical background and wants to actually understand what they own.

ReWalk is a wearable robotic exoskeleton. think a set of motorized braces that go over the hips and knees, strapped onto someone who has a spinal cord injury and can't walk on their own. the person leans forward slightly, the device reads that shift in weight, and the motors move the legs in a walking motion. crutches are used for balance. that's it in plain terms, no medical jargon needed.

who it's for: people with spinal cord injuries, ranging from mid back down to lower back level injuries, who would otherwise be in a wheelchair full time.

what makes it stand out from other devices in this space (The Moat): it's the only personal exoskeleton that lets users walk over stairs and curbs, which opens up real world environments instead of just flat indoor surfaces. most competitors are limited to flat ground or clinic settings only. This is Lifeward's primary product moat: ReWalk is the only personal exoskeleton to receive FDA clearance for use on stairs and curbs in the United States. The FDA even granted it a "Breakthrough Device" designation because of this. No other company has this clearance, meaning ReWalk holds a functional monopoly on navigating real-world architectural barriers like a flight of steps or a sidewalk curb. ReWalk is built and cleared for actual day to day use at home and in the community, not just rehab sessions.

the newest version, ReWalk 7, added a new crutch control system that makes it easier and faster to learn how to use, which matters a lot since training time has historically been a barrier for these devices.

benefits aren't just "they can walk again." studies tied to ReWalk use point to improvements in spasticity, trunk control, bladder and bowel function, and mental health, on top of the obvious mobility gain. that's a big deal for a population that deals with a lot of secondary health issues from being seated all day every day.

coverage is the other piece that matters for the business side (The Reimbursement Moat): Because these devices cost upwards of $100k, insurance coverage is the business model, and Lifeward has established a massive first-mover moat here. Medicare added ReWalk to its brace benefit category back in January 2024, creating a standardized, national payment pathway. Following that landmark ruling, commercial payers are falling into line. More recently three of the largest Medicare Advantage insurers, Aetna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare, have all approved coverage for qualifying patients, representing close to 16 million covered lives between them. This commercial backing forms a massive barrier to entry for competitors. wider insurance coverage means more patients can actually access the device without paying out of pocket, which is the real unlock for sales growth.

ReWalk isn't just a cool robot, it's a clinically proven mobility device with real health benefits, expanding insurance backing, and a feature set (stairs/curbs, easier training) that puts it ahead of where the competition currently sits.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

Reimbursement is key for LFWD turnaround

​

Quick background for anyone new here. LFWD, formerly known as ReWalk Robotics, makes a wearable robotic exoskeleton that lets people with spinal cord injuries stand up and walk. Incredible tech, but for years the company had a huge problem. The device works, but almost nobody could actually get insurance to pay for it. That is finally changing, and it is the biggest reason people are paying attention to this stock right now.

Let me break down how insurance reimbursement actually works here, in plain language.

Step 1: Getting a code

Before any insurance company can pay for a medical device, that device needs its own billing code. Think of it like a barcode that tells Medicare and private insurers exactly what they are being asked to pay for. Without a code, insurers just say no because they have no system to process the claim.

In 2020, ReWalk got its first ever code for an exoskeleton, called HCPCS code K1007. This was a big deal because no exoskeleton had ever gotten one before. It opened the door, but it did not set a price yet.

Step 2: Getting a category

Next the government has to decide what kind of medical equipment this even is. In 2023 Medicare officially put personal exoskeletons into the brace benefit category. This matters because braces get paid out in one lump sum instead of small recurring payments, which is a much cleaner and more predictable path to revenue for the company.

Step 3: Getting a price

Having a code and a category means nothing without an actual dollar amount attached. This is where things really turned. In April 2024, Medicare finalized a payment rate for K1007 at exactly $91,031.93 per device. That is a real number the government has agreed to pay, not a hope or a projection.

Step 4: Getting private insurers on board

Medicare is only part of the picture. Private insurance companies make their own decisions independently, and this used to be the biggest wall for the company. Cigna became the first major private insurer to move away from a blanket denial policy back in 2019, agreeing to review cases individually instead of rejecting them outright.

That trickle turned into real momentum recently. Over the winter, three of the biggest Medicare Advantage insurers in the country, UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and most recently Aetna, all independently approved coverage for individual patients. Together those three companies cover about 16 million people. When three separate giant insurers reach the same conclusion on their own, it tells you the clinical evidence is doing its job.

The Management Shift: From Product Pioneers to Commercial Execution

This brings us to the real catalyst behind why this plumbing is finally working. For years, the old management team operated purely like a tech pioneer. They did the heavy lifting of keeping the company alive, getting FDA clearances, and pushing for that initial raw billing code. But they were engineers and product people, not commercial operators. They built an incredible machine, but they did not know how to systematically force insurers to open their checkbooks.

The turning point came when the company transitioned leadership to Mark Grant. The major advantage of the new management team is that they are execution focused executives who actually understand how to weaponize the regulatory infrastructure the old team left behind.

Instead of treating the Medicare codes like a nice press release, new management built a dedicated internal reimbursement team. They stopped just waiting for inbound interest and started systematically pushing individual claims through the pipeline, forcing insurers to honor the federal fee schedule. You can see it directly in the data: the sudden cascade of wins with UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and Aetna did not happen by accident. It happened because the new leadership knows exactly how to work the gears of the insurance system, turning legal and administrative precedents into predictable corporate revenue.

Why this actually matters for the turnaround

Before all this, Lifeward was basically selling a life changing device that almost nobody could afford out of pocket. Now there is an actual paved road from a doctor's prescription to an insurance check. Every new code, category, price, and insurer approval removes one more obstacle between the product and the patient who needs it. That is not just good PR, that is the exact plumbing a medical device company needs in place before it can scale revenue.

There was even an administrative law judge ruling this year in favor of a Medicare patient's appeal, confirming the ReWalk is a reasonable and necessary device. Rulings like that build precedent and make future approvals much harder for insurance companies to fight.

This is the boring unsexy part of the story that does not show up in a hype headline, but it is genuinely the foundation the whole bull case is being built on.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

Meet CEO Mark Grant: The Man Architecting the LFWD Turnaround

Mark Grant took over as President and CEO in June 2025, replacing Larry Jasinski who had run the company (then still ReWalk Robotics) for years. Jasinski stuck around as Co-CEO briefly and then in an advisory role through the end of 2025 to help with the handoff, ensuring a planned transition rather than a chaotic exit.

His resume is worth walking through because it explains a lot of what's happened since he arrived. Grant spent almost two decades at Medtronic (2004 to 2023), working his way up to Vice President for the Americas within the Diabetes Group. In that seat, he had full P&L responsibility for a business doing north of $1.5 billion a year. His mandate there covered building out sales channels, securing critical access to new payer relationships (including the VA), managing complex revenue cycle operations, and restructuring the business as market conditions shifted.

Before Medtronic, he was at Bristol Myers Squibb and FLA Orthopedics in commercial leadership. Right before joining Lifeward, he was President of Americas and Chief Commercial Officer at IMRA Surgical, where he built out the go-to-market infrastructure for a brand-new category of soft-tissue robotic surgical procedures. He holds a BS in industrial technology from East Carolina University. The clear through-line across his 30-year career is commercial buildout, reimbursement navigation, and channel development in medtech—he's an operational sales guy, not a bench scientist.

That background is exactly why the board brought him in with a clear mandate: get Lifeward to profitability. On the ReWalk side specifically, his first year has been about capitalizing on structural tailwinds already in motion: the newly established Medicare reimbursement pathway for personal exoskeletons, the launch of the ReWalk 7, and the transition to in-house manufacturing to lift margins. We started seeing that discipline show up clearly in the Q2 2025 numbers, which posted a gross margin near 44% and cut quarterly cash burn to under $4 million.

A side story that might turn out to be a major catalyst is Grant’s deep diabetes commercial experience, this explains why Lifeward executed the strategic transaction with the Oramed oral insulin platform in January 2026. While it’s a real piece of the corporate structure now, the core day-to-day value driver remains the exoskeleton and rehab portfolio.

Turning around a small-cap medtech company isn't an engineering problem anymore; it's a commercial execution and insurance reimbursement problem. That is the exact game Grant has played and won at scale. Running a $1.5B P&L means dealing with payers, distributors, and revenue cycle headaches vastly more complex than what LFWD faces. With the Medicare reimbursement framework finally active, if he can replicate even a fraction of his Medtronic channel expansion here, the stock is completely mispriced for that outcome.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

LFWD: Take a break from the spreadsheets, just watch the sci fi

Quick context if you are new to LFWD. Lifeward, which used to be called ReWalk Robotics, builds actual physical medical tech that helps people move again after spinal cord injuries or strokes. This is not some hype story about a concept. It is real hardware being used right now in clinics and homes.

If you want a quick feel for what they actually build, take a break from squinting at SEC filings and just watch the gear in action.

The ReWalk 7 Exoskeleton

This is a personal wearable bionic suit for people with lower limb paralysis. It lets users stand, walk, turn, and even handle stairs.

The best part is that this is not just a cool video from a tech convention. With Medicare coverage expanding in the US, this is actively being prescribed and paid for by insurance.

Watch it handle stairs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWEDF6Mx5WA

The AlterG Anti Gravity Treadmill

This one uses air pressure technology derived from NASA to literally unweight a patient by up to 80 percent.

It looks a little funny, almost like you are zipped into a giant bubble wrap suit, but it is a massive commercial hit. Thousands of clinics and pro sports teams use it so athletes can run without wrecking their joints during rehab.

Watch it defy gravity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qllqv8S\_6QU

Seeing these two in motion makes the whole thesis click way faster than a massive financial model. You have a company solving real human mobility challenges with two completely distinct products that already have strong clinical adoption.

Definitely worth five minutes of your time if you are building a position or just watching from the sidelines.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 1 month ago

LFWD Why standing upright matters way more than people realize

Hey everyone, Tasty here, first post here so a quick intro. I have some experience in biotech stocks, but the more relevant piece for this sub is my background. I have a background in physical therapy, most of my clinical experience is in orthopedics, with less time spent specifically in neuro rehab, but a lot of the core principles around mobility and movement still carry over. I wanted to bring a clinical perspective to the LFWD conversation instead of just talking about numbers.

Let's talk about the actual product for a minute, because I think the clinical side of the ReWalk gets glossed over in most financial posts.

The ReWalk is a powered exoskeleton for people with spinal cord injuries. It lets someone stand up and walk using a wearable brace system controlled by their own subtle shifts in balance. What gets me excited is not just the walking itself. It is what standing upright actually does to the human body over time.

When someone uses a wheelchair for years, the body adapts to that sitting position in ways that are terrible long term. Here is what standing and walking in a device like this can help with, based on what the company has published from user surveys and data:

Spasticity: Muscles that are chronically tight or overactive due to nerve damage tend to calm down with regular weight bearing and movement. Less spasticity means better sleep, more comfort, and less reliance on heavy medication.

Trunk control: Holding an upright posture forces core and postural muscles to work in a way that sitting never will. Better trunk control translates to easier transfers, better sitting balance, and way more independence in daily tasks.

Bowel and bladder function: This one surprises people outside of clinical practice, but upright positioning and movement can meaningfully improve gut motility and bladder emptying. For a population that deals with chronic bowel complications, this is a massive quality of life victory.

Bone and cardiovascular health: Weight bearing activity slows down the bone density loss that comes with long term wheelchair use. It also gives the heart and lungs a workout they simply cannot get from a sitting position. Over months and years, that adds up.

The Human Element

I have seen this firsthand in clinical settings, and it is something no spreadsheet can capture. I once worked with a patient who lit up every single morning when he saw me, simply because he knew it meant he would get to stand up and walk that day. Gravity and movement did wonders for his bowel motility, which made a massive, real difference in his comfort.

What takes the dignity aspect to a completely different level is that this device is intended for home use. It is one thing to achieve these milestones in a clinic under a therapist's supervision, but being able to stand up, move around, and manage your basic bodily functions independently in your own home changes everything. It restores a level of personal privacy and daily dignity that a spreadsheet just cannot measure.

From a clinical standpoint, this is a genuinely well built rehab tool. The fact that it is not just a research prototype, but a device already getting FDA clearance updates and expanding Medicare reimbursement specifically for home use, tells me the industry is starting to treat it with the respect it deserves.

Happy to answer any questions to the best of my knowledge if anyone wants to learn more about the clinical side.

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 2 months ago

$DRTS - The Float Problem Nobody Is Talking About

After reading a post by @SlimyMango on stocktwits yesterday it got me thinking, Most people look at DRTS and see a small cap biotech with a thin trading history. What they're missing is that the float here is almost artificially constrained, and that changes everything when institutions start moving in.

Here's the math. There are roughly 90 million shares outstanding. Insiders hold about 39% of that. Then Tolmar just came in with a $20M equity investment, picking up 1.67 million shares at $11.99 as part of their 20-year commercial partnership. Those shares effectively locked up.

So what's actually available to trade is a lot smaller than the headline share count suggests.

Now think about what happens when a mid-size fund, say a healthcare focused fund with $500M AUM, decides they want a 1% position in DRTS. That's roughly $8M worth of stock they need to buy. In a normal large cap that's nothing. In DRTS, with the float as tight as it is and most holders not selling, they are going to have to pay up to get filled. There's no way around it.

This is not theory. This is how small cap biotech re-ratings happen. The supply just isn't there to absorb institutional demand quietly. At some point they have to chase it.

We're sitting at roughly 4.5% institutional ownership right now. ARK and Citadel have already started building positions. But 4.5% is still almost nothing.

And the catalyst runway is not empty. REGAIN enrollment resumed after FDA clearance and early GBM data is already showing signals. ReSTART hit full enrollment. Pancreatic data landed at DDW and ASCO. Japan approved through MHLW. Tolmar's commercial infrastructure for prostate is in place.

Every one of those milestones is the kind of thing that shows up in an analyst's derisking checklist. Funds do not buy on hope, they buy when boxes get checked. The boxes are getting checked right now, one by one, while institutional ownership is still sitting near the floor.

When the funds decide it's time, the float becomes their problem, not ours.

Disclaimer: I used AI to help research and draft this post.

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 2 months ago

Weekend Dive on Alpha Tau's H2 2026 Catalyst Timeline

Alpha Tau has hit most of their stated H1 milestones, which sets up a fairly loaded back half of the year. I put together a straightforward breakdown of where they stand and what's coming.

*Note on process: AI tools were used for research assistance, fact checking, and image generation.

Quick recap. They submitted their first FDA PMA module for skin cancer in January, completed enrollment in the ReSTART pivotal trial in May with 88 patients, and reported early glioblastoma data showing 100% local control and a 67% complete response rate in the first three patients. They presented pancreatic survival data at ASCO in June, and announced a partnership with Tolmar that brought in 35 million in upfront cash and manufacturing support for a prostate cancer program.

That's the foundation. Here is what's actually coming.

Summer 2026

Podium presentation at the AHNS head and neck conference covering their Keytruda combination study. This one hasn't gotten much attention yet.

Full enrollment completion for the IMPACT pancreatic trial, recently expanded to 40 patients with a combination chemotherapy arm added.

The final 7 slots in the REGAIN glioblastoma trial filling in, following FDA clearance earlier this month to resume enrollment and add new US sites.

Ongoing commercial activity in Japan where they already hold marketing approval for head and neck cancer.

Late 2026

Top line data from the 88 patient ReSTART pivotal trial in skin cancer. They have Breakthrough Device Designation for this indication, so clean data feeds directly into the remaining PMA modules and puts an early 2027 approval decision in play.

Initial 10 patient data readout from the REGAIN glioblastoma trial. This determines whether the program advances into a US pivotal study.

Early data from the expanded IMPACT pancreatic cohort.

Enrollment and interim data building from the ACAPELLA study in Europe.

2027 and Beyond

Potential FDA approval for recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and the start of US commercialization.

Pivotal trial decisions for glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer based on the late 2026 readouts.

First patient treatments under the Tolmar prostate program.

A few things worth noting. The ReSTART readout is the most important near-term event from a regulatory standpoint. It's not speculative, it's the direct input into the PMA submission. The glioblastoma data is the higher-variance event. Brain cancer is a historically difficult indication and no one is pricing in much from that program right now, which is probably the right call until the 10 patient data is actually in hand. If it holds up, that changes the conversation pretty quickly.

The Tolmar deal is underappreciated as a structural piece here. It doesn't just add cash, it adds a credible commercial partner with existing infrastructure in the oncology space.

NFA DYOR.

u/Tasty-AH750 — 2 months ago
▲ 106 r/DRTS_Stock+1 crossposts

Yes DRTS won the deal, but wait till you hear Tolmers plan to dominate the market

Everyone's talking about what Alpha Tau gets out of this deal. $20M equity investment at a 25% premium, $15M toward a new U.S. manufacturing facility, up to $161.5M in milestones. Great deal for $DRTS, obviously.

But I want to flip the lens. Why did Tolmar, a profitable specialty pharma company with 22 marketed products and estimated revenues of $100M-$500M, write a $35M check upfront for a therapy that hasn't even started a formal U.S. trial yet? Because the math on their end is pretty compelling.

The market they're buying into, as the DRTS CEO Uzi Sofer said to Globes, the recurring prostate cancer market, represents roughly 60,000-80,000 potential patients per year in the U.S. alone. This is the specific population Tolmar is targeting first, men whose prostate cancer has come back after initial treatment.

Here's the problem that makes this market so valuable: once prostate cancer recurs after radiation, you basically can't re-irradiate the same area with conventional radiation. The tissue has already absorbed its lifetime dose. Your options get very limited very fast. Surgery after radiation is extremely morbid. Systemic therapies exist but they come with their own tradeoffs. Local salvage options are genuinely scarce.

Alpha DaRT's mechanism is specifically suited for this gap. It delivers alpha radiation directly inside the tumor via tiny seeds, with an extremely short diffusion range. That precision matters a lot when you're treating tissue that's already been radiated before.

The numbers Tolmar is looking at, and this is my own back-of-the-envelope, not financial advice, but walk through it:

If you assume Alpha DaRT eventually captures 20% of that recurring prostate cancer population, say 20% penetration of a 60,000 patient pool, that's 12,000 treatments per year.

At an estimated $100,000 per treatment, that's $1.2B in annual revenue for Tolmar on a single indication.

Even at the low end of Sofer's patient estimate, 20% of 60,000, you're still at $1.2B. At 20% of 80,000 you're at $1.6B.

Tolmar's supply price to Alpha Tau is set at 60% of net sales. So Tolmar keeps 40 cents on every dollar of net sales after paying Alpha Tau. On $1.2B gross that's roughly $480M staying with Tolmar, before their own costs. For a company their size, that's a potentially transformative number.

And that's before the bladder cancer option they hold.

Tolmar is specifically well positioned because this isn't a company that wandered into urology. Tolmar already has deep commercial infrastructure, existing relationships with urologists and oncologists across the U.S., and a track record of getting products adopted in this exact specialty.

They're not starting from scratch on sales execution. That commercial depth is precisely why Alpha Tau gave them exclusivity rather than building their own U.S. sales force.

For Tolmar, the $35M upfront is the price of entry into one of the only localized treatment modalities that could realistically address recurring prostate cancer at scale. They have a 20-year exclusive on a high-value procedure in a specialty where they already operate, backed by a partner that is leading clinical development and handling manufacturing. They don't have to build the science. They just have to sell it, which is exactly what they're already doing every day in this market.

For the market to be pricing $DRTS the way it currently is, it has to be assuming this is just an Alpha Tau story. The Tolmar angle suggests a sophisticated commercial operator ran their own due diligence and liked what they saw enough to pay a 25% premium for equity on the same day they signed.

That's the part I keep coming back to.

NFA DYOR

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 3 months ago

Anders Research is increasing his (already large) position

From Andres research:

"$DRTS going full mainstream, and is down 12% today on ASCO data that was largely already reported.

Have been increasing my already-large position size this morning."

https://x.com/i/status/2061479466728046761

In another post:

"A lot of new investors that don't quite know the $DRTS story selling it off on ASCO data.

These data are from disparate, diversely-enrolled trials, with many patients not receiving full tumor coverage.

And still Alpha DaRTs is delivering 11+ months mOS vs. 6 months SoC...

The 17-month mOS from last chemo initiation is an interesting data point but difficult to interpret.

The bottom line is that even at these levels Alpha DaRT is a major improvement in SoC that can be COMBINED with $RVMD's daraxonrasib because of its stellar safety.

AND that the data from the US-based 40-patient pancreatic trial due around YE will likely look even better. "

https://x.com/anders\_research/status/2061481887713857886?s=46

In another post:

"Many not realizing that $DRTS' Alpha DaRTs isn't even competing with $RVMD's daraxonrasib.

The two will likely be used in combination.

Dara's 13 months mOS is great, a doubling vs. SoC, but you are still dying in a year...

Not to mention DaRT's immunogenic effect (CPI combo)"

https://x.com/anders\_research/status/2061482767066505679?s=46

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 3 months ago

CFO just confirmed DRTS is presenting survival data at ASCO this weekend

We got confirmation from CFO Raphi Levy yesterday that Alpha Tau will be dropping survival data from their pancreatic cancer trials at ASCO this weekend.

The median survival for patients who failed first line Folfirinox is 10.1 months. In an early combined Alpha DaRT + Folfirinox trial, 8 out of 10 patients were still alive at 15 months (as of January 2025). Small sample size, early data but this direction and results will be very hard to ignore.

Presenting safety, efficacy AND survival data at ASCO, the most prestigious oncology conference in the world, is a BIG deal. 

ASCO takes place this weekend

u/Tasty-AH750 — 3 months ago

Under the radar signals on $DRTS that most people are missing

Not talking about the clinical data. Talking about the market structure stuff that doesn't make headlines.

Volume has matured. Average daily volume is sitting around 500K shares. A year ago this stock was at $2.78. That volume profile doesn't happen by accident — it means real accumulation.

Market cap rerating in real time. May 2025 $184M. October 2025 $370M. April 2026 $628M. Now approaching $913M at $10.38. That's not a pump, that's a slow grind higher as milestones get checked off.

Institutions are showing up. 37 institutional owners have now filed 13F/13D forms. The names matter: Bank of America grew their position by 2,779%, Mariner LLC added 185.8%, Wells Fargo raised their position by 291.7%.  When Millennium and BofA are filing in the same cycle on a sub-$1B name, that's worth noticing.

Nobody is shorting this. Short interest is 0.65% of shares outstanding according to StockAnalysis. For a clinical-stage biotech, that's basically zero. Shorts aren't touching it.

The warrants are pricing in a move. DRTSW is trading at $2.56 with expiration in March 2027 — less than a year out. That's real money going into a leveraged, time-limited instrument. Nobody pays $2.56 for a warrant expiring in 10 months unless they think the common has significantly more room to run. 

Insider ownership is unusually high. Insiders and core strategic holders control over 32% of the company, with the CEO personally holding over 13%. The float is tighter than it looks and management is not selling.

Chart is strong. 52-week low was $2.78, now trading near the high at $10.38. Short and long-term MAs both on buy signals, short above long, MACD buy signal confirmed. Trading above the 200-day MA near the top of the 52-week range. 

Analyst consensus zero sells. 4 analysts, average target $13.50, high target $17. Still under-covered, which means there's room for rerating when more eyes find this.

Stock is up almost 250% in 52 weeks and still hasn't crossed $1B market cap. The setup is intact.

Not financial advice. DYOR.

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 3 months ago

I Read the ASCO Abstract and Realized I Was Only Getting Half the Story. Here's What I'm expecting the Conference Will Actually Show.

Let’s be clear: the ASCO abstract that dropped last week is just the trailer. The actual presentation, with full patient breakdowns, survival curves, and subgroup analyses, happens at the conference starting May 29th. That’s where the real story gets told, and it’s what I’ll be watching closely.

ASCO abstracts are intentionally stripped down. The numbers that actually matter to investors come from the podium. Given what this company has been quietly building all year, I think there’s a lot more coming than the abstract lets on.

So, What am I looking for at ASCO:

The 58-Patient Breakdown: DDW showed a staggering 100% local disease control across patients ranging from chemo naive to fourth line failures. Will that hold when expanded to the full pooled cohort from all three sites?

The Immune Signal: Montreal data at ASCO GI showed Alpha DaRT didn't suppress the immune system like conventional radiation does. It also showed a dramatic drop in IL-6 (a key inflammation marker). If this pattern repeats across the full pooled dataset, people are seriously underestimating its potential for combination therapy.

Updated Subgroup Survival Data: This is the big one. At the 2025 R&D Day, post-FOLFIRINOX patients hit a median OS that hadn't even been reached yet at 15 months vs. a 10–11 month historical benchmark. Chemo-ineligible patients showed 7.5 months median OS vs. 3–3.5 months untreated. I want to see if these trends hold across the larger pooled cohort.

IMPACT Combo Signals: The U.S. IMPACT trial (DaRT+chemo) wraps recruitment in Q3. While it’s too early for efficacy data, any early safety or clean tolerability signals will provide meaningful context for where this program is heading.

The big picture is what keeps me in this name. Three major conference presentations in a single year—ASCO GI, DDW, and the main ASCO annual meeting. A company this size doesn't get that kind of exposure unless the scientific community is genuinely interested. That's how you build the credibility that moves regulators.

Conference starts in four days.

— Not financial advice, do your own DD.

reddit.com
u/Tasty-AH750 — 3 months ago