u/TheMightyChocolate

I don't like the flair but I had to choose one. I would have chosen "lifestyle" if it was avaiable.

Examples:

-Someone who is 30 and has been at their university for a decade will be a shitty friend and partner because they are clearly too lazy or incompetent to actually commit to any task

-Someone who has been in 10 relationships in 5 years is either incapable of seeing they make bad choices or they actually suck as a person. They will bring the same same attitude to their workplace

-Someone who can't do basic stuff like cook food, wash their own laundry, keep their living space clean will be a shitty partner. They can't even take care of their own life.

Now of course there are always exception. But they are rare So anything like "but I know someone who X" is not a real response to what I said. There are things like chronic diseases or genetically low intelligence, which might force someone into a dead end minimum wage job through no fault of their own. These are rare.

Hallo werte Carbonajünger,

Kurze Erklärung zu meiner Situation:

Ich bin 23 Jahre alt, in Deutschland aufgewachsen, Deutscher Staatsbürger und studiere Medizin in Österreich. Es ist also sehr wahrscheinlich, dass ich(mit Inflation) in 10 Jahren ein Bruttoeinkommen von >100.000€/Jahr haben werde. Noch dazu wird ja jetzt schon diskutiert diese Grenze komplett zu entfernen oder zu senken damit man noch einmal die Renten erhöhen kann.

Nun war mein Vater eine absolute Vollkatastrophe, hat auf allen Ebenen versagt und mich komplett als Kind vernachlässigt bis zu dem Punkt, dass ich irgendwann mein Essen bei Verwandten holen musste.

Der Mann ist außerdem verschuldet, konnte nie mit Geld umgehen, hat regelmäßig Monatelang nicht gearbeitet und hat keinen Cent den der Staat ihm abnehmen könnte. Leider legt mein Vater die selbe Einstellung bei seiner Gesundheit an den Tag und hat bereits ein Bein wegen unbehandeltem Diabetes verloren. Es ist davon auszugehen, dass er irgendwann zum Pflegefall wird was er sicher auch großartig fände, weil er dann noch mehr den ganzen Tag rumgammeln kann. Unterhalt hat natürlich nie jemand von ihm gesehen.

Mein Glück ist jetzt folgendes: Ich bin mit 15 Jahren ausgezogen und habe dann 1 Jahr im Jugendheim gelebt - danach bei einer Pflegefamilie. Seitdem besteht kein Kontakt. Wäre ich der Pflegefamilie gegenüber pflichtig hätte ich da gar kein Problem damit, aber bei meinem Vater - nein danke.

Demnach müsste ich nachweisen können, dass mein Vater seinen väterlichen Pflichten grob nicht nachgekommen und wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe, kann ich damit die Unterhaltspflicht umgehen. Normalerweise geht das ja nur extrem schwer aber ich dürfte ein Fall sein wo das funktionieren könnte oder?

Wie seht ihr da meine Chancen? Ist das was worum ich mich jetzt schon kümmern kann? Was ist die Anlaufstelle dafür? Muss ich da zu einem Anwalt? Wenn ja, welcher?

So I do a lot of urban exploring in my free time and I've been to great places which I would in principle like to post pictures of. I often do my own research to find places, so I have been to places that are not well known.

Some of these places were slightly illegal to enter and some of these were very illegal to enter (for example former army bases which are actively patrolled by security). I've never gotten into trouble and I've never shared my pictures in public forums.

For those of you who have experience with posting pictures publicly, have you ever heard of people getting into trouble for it? They are posting evidence of criminal activities afterall. I feel like it's hard to argue that's not you.

This is mostly a question for those people who are as retarded as me who explore places where the owners really seriously do not want people there. Not places where no one actually cares. Please only answer if you have actual experience, not "I would think that"

Before you crucify me, hear me out.

When I occupy a territory with my army, there is always a famine and the local economy collapses completely (and sometimes never recovers) while I understand that war is brutal and exacting on the civilian population, I think in many cases it doesn't make sense for the population to be starving. First of all, maybe the leadership of the enemy country is fine with just occupying the territory. The goal is occupying or maybe even annexing the territory. Killing everyone was undesirable because of practicality and at least a basic sense of morality. The us army didn't just let confederate civilians in occupied territories starve, neither did this happen in ww1(there were famines but not on a genocidal level and if germany wasn't blockaded, the occupied territories would have been fed too because these people would still have money. There was a famine because germany couldn't even feed itself). This brings me to my second point. Occupied territories are blockaded. In real life civilians would have access to the market of the occupying country. They could buy food there. It would be expensive and they would have definitely been taken advantage of, but they wouldn't die en masse like in victoria.

In victoria, civilians always suffer catastrophically for the entirety of the occupation, while in real life during the time period this wasn't the case(if avoidable). Sometimes it was not avoidable.

I think occupied territories should join the market of the occupying power for the duration of the occupation instead of just becoming isolated. It makes intuitive and historical sense. There should be a strong modifier for goods output though because of disrupted supply lines and also because occupied territory shouldn't be able to outcompete your factories if it joins your market