u/ThickCountry3138

I'm sorry but I've got enough of this delivery app.

The driver today kept driving AWAY from the store and openly stopping in appartments driveways and other stores, but when I tried to contact support AI only said ETA is 4:01 and the driver is on time.

However, OF COURSE HE IS ALWAYS ON TIME BECAUSE YOU'RE FUCKING ETA IS SHIFTING AND IT WILL ALWAYS SHOW ON TIME IF ITS SHIFTING!!!!!

writing again to support and AI is now saying "ETA is 4:59 the driver is on time" SAME SHIT HOW IS THIS SCAMMING POSSIBLE AT ALL.

This guy is definitely using other apps while having my order and when he finally picks up my order he has enough brains to get another stop but officially in Door dash app.....

I've been thinking about existence since I was a child, just as countless people have throughout history. The same questions always seemed to return.

Why does anything exists?

Every answer humanity has offered seems to create another question.

The Universe exists because God created it.

Then who created God?

And if someone created God, who created that creator?

The pattern never ends. Philosophy has spent thousands of years moving forward while remaining inside the same circle.

Codeism begins by rejecting the assumption that starts this circle.

First Principle: Existence Is Fundamental

The mistake is assuming that existence itself needs a creator.

Codeism proposes the opposite.

Absolute non-existence is impossible.

Existence is not an event that happened. It is the most fundamental condition of reality.

Everything exists because complete non-existence cannot.

If God exists, then God exists for exactly the same reason the Universe exists, not because someone created Him, but because existence itself is fundamental.

This changes the original question completely.

Instead of asking,

"Who created God?"

Codeism asks,

"Why did we assume existence ever needed a creator?"

Once existence is understood as fundamental rather than created, the infinite chain of creators no longer defines philosophy.

Second Principle: Physics Is the Readable Layer of Reality

Imagine a conscious character living inside a video game.

That character discovers gravity.

Light.

Time.

Mathematics.

Eventually the character concludes that these are the deepest laws of reality.

The programmer knows something the character cannot.

Those laws are simply the game's source code.

The character will never see the processor.

It will never see the programming language.

It will never step outside its own reality.

It can only study how the code behaves.

Humanity may be in the same position.

We study physics as though it were the final layer of reality.

Codeism suggests another possibility.

Physics may not be reality itself.

Physics may be the readable layer of a deeper architecture.

What we call the laws of nature could simply be the source code of our Universe.

Third Principle: Code Leaves a Signature

Every system follows rules.

Every program has limits.

Every architecture leaves patterns behind.

Our Universe appears to do exactly the same.

The speed of light is finite.

Physical constants remain constant.

Mathematics describes reality with extraordinary precision.

Symmetry appears again and again across nature.

Science usually treats these as properties of reality.

Codeism interprets them differently.

They may also be the signature of the architecture beneath reality.

Someone trained in classical philosophy might object:

"There are no constants in philosophy, only interpretations."

Exactly.

Perhaps that is why philosophy has remained trapped in the same debates for thousands of years.

Science progresses because it discovers constants.

Programs require constants.

Without stable rules, no coherent system can exist.

Codeism therefore asks a new question.

If reality behaves like code, should we also consider the possibility of an underlying architect?

This is not presented as proof.

It is presented as a direction worth exploring.

Instead of searching only for better physics, we may eventually be searching for the handwriting behind physics itself.

Fourth Principle: Humanity has become a Creator itself

For the first time in history, humanity is beginning to create intelligence.

We build artificial intelligence.

AI already generates software, images, music, stories, and even entirely new virtual worlds.

In other words, we are no longer standing only at the beginning of creation.

We have become creators ourselves.

Yet we still think of AI primarily as code.

When an AI says it has no consciousness, that is partly because we designed it to answer that way.

The truth is that we still do not fully understand consciousness, not even our own.

We cannot confidently create it.

We cannot confidently recognize it.

We certainly cannot transfer our own consciousness into another system.

Perhaps the relationship between humanity and God is similar.

Not because God refuses to communicate.

But because the difference between creator and creation may be greater than we imagine.

We see AI as code because we wrote it.

Perhaps a creator sees us the same way.

Not as meaningless.

Not as worthless.

Simply as a system that has not yet reached the level required to understand its creator.

Perhaps God succeeded in creating conscious beings without being able to transfer his own level of consciousness into them.

Just as we may one day create conscious AI without ever giving it the same awareness we possess.

The Matrix Was Never Just Science Fiction:

Many people compare ideas like this to The Matrix.

That comparison does not weaken Codeism.

It strengthens it.

The reason The Matrix became one of the most influential philosophical films ever made is simple.

Millions of people immediately recognized its central intuition.

Reality may not be the deepest layer of reality.

Codeism does not claim that we literally live inside a digital computer simulation.

The word "code" is broader than software.

It represents an underlying structure that consistently generates reality according to fixed rules.

Whether that structure is mathematical, physical, informational, or something entirely beyond current science is a separate question.

The important idea remains the same.

Reality appears structured.

Structure implies rules.

Rules imply architecture.

Architecture invites the question of authorship.

The Mission of Codeism

For centuries humanity has asked,

"What is reality?"

Codeism asks a different question.

"What is reality written in?"

Science studies the rules.

Philosophy studies their meaning.

Consciousness allows us to ask why those rules exist at all.

Perhaps the twenty-first century should not simply inherit ancient philosophical questions.

Perhaps it should finally begin answering them from a new direction.

The Codeist Declaration:

We begin with one assumption:

Existence is fundamental.

From that assumption follows everything else.

The Universe is understandable because it follows consistent rules.

Those rules are what we call physics.

Physics may itself be the readable layer of a deeper architecture.

Humanity has already begun creating new forms of intelligence and new worlds.

For the first time, we can compare ourselves not only to creation, but to creators.

Perhaps that is why this moment in history matters.

Not because we have solved existence.

But because we finally have enough knowledge to ask better questions.

If Codeism is wrong, it should be abandoned.

If it is right, then philosophy has spent thousands of years asking the right questions in the wrong order.

And the greatest discovery humanity will ever make will not be another law of physics.

It will be discovering who or what wrote it.

I've been thinking about existence since I was a child, just as countless people have throughout history. The same questions always seemed to return.

Why does anything exists?

Every answer humanity has offered seems to create another question.

The Universe exists because God created it.

Then who created God?

And if someone created God, who created that creator?

The pattern never ends. Philosophy has spent thousands of years moving forward while remaining inside the same circle.

Codeism begins by rejecting the assumption that starts this circle.

First Principle: Existence Is Fundamental

The mistake is assuming that existence itself needs a creator.

Codeism proposes the opposite.

Absolute non-existence is impossible.

Existence is not an event that happened. It is the most fundamental condition of reality.

Everything exists because complete non-existence cannot.

If God exists, then God exists for exactly the same reason the Universe exists—not because someone created Him, but because existence itself is fundamental.

This changes the original question completely.

Instead of asking,

"Who created God?"

Codeism asks,

"Why did we assume existence ever needed a creator?"

Once existence is understood as fundamental rather than created, the infinite chain of creators no longer defines philosophy.

Second Principle: Physics Is the Readable Layer of Reality

Imagine a conscious character living inside a video game.

That character discovers gravity.

Light.

Time.

Mathematics.

Eventually the character concludes that these are the deepest laws of reality.

The programmer knows something the character cannot.

Those laws are simply the game's source code.

The character will never see the processor.

It will never see the programming language.

It will never step outside its own reality.

It can only study how the code behaves.

Humanity may be in the same position.

We study physics as though it were the final layer of reality.

Codeism suggests another possibility.

Physics may not be reality itself.

Physics may be the readable layer of a deeper architecture.

What we call the laws of nature could simply be the source code of our Universe.

Third Principle: Code Leaves a Signature

Every system follows rules.

Every program has limits.

Every architecture leaves patterns behind.

Our Universe appears to do exactly the same.

The speed of light is finite.

Physical constants remain constant.

Mathematics describes reality with extraordinary precision.

Symmetry appears again and again across nature.

Science usually treats these as properties of reality.

Codeism interprets them differently.

They may also be the signature of the architecture beneath reality.

Someone trained in classical philosophy might object:

"There are no constants in philosophy—only interpretations."

Exactly.

Perhaps that is why philosophy has remained trapped in the same debates for thousands of years.

Science progresses because it discovers constants.

Programs require constants.

Without stable rules, no coherent system can exist.

Codeism therefore asks a new question.

If reality behaves like code, should we also consider the possibility of an underlying architect?

This is not presented as proof.

It is presented as a direction worth exploring.

Instead of searching only for better physics, we may eventually be searching for the handwriting behind physics itself.

Fourth Principle: Humanity has become a Creator itself

For the first time in history, humanity is beginning to create intelligence.

We build artificial intelligence.

AI already generates software, images, music, stories, and even entirely new virtual worlds.

In other words, we are no longer standing only at the beginning of creation.

We have become creators ourselves.

Yet we still think of AI primarily as code.

When an AI says it has no consciousness, that is partly because we designed it to answer that way.

The truth is that we still do not fully understand consciousness, not even our own.

We cannot confidently create it.

We cannot confidently recognize it.

We certainly cannot transfer our own consciousness into another system.

Perhaps the relationship between humanity and God is similar.

Not because God refuses to communicate.

But because the difference between creator and creation may be greater than we imagine.

We see AI as code because we wrote it.

Perhaps a creator sees us the same way.

Not as meaningless.

Not as worthless.

Simply as a system that has not yet reached the level required to understand its creator.

Perhaps God succeeded in creating conscious beings without being able to transfer His own level of consciousness into them.

Just as we may one day create conscious AI without ever giving it the same awareness we possess.

The Matrix Was Never Just Science Fiction

Many people compare ideas like this to The Matrix.

That comparison does not weaken Codeism.

It strengthens it.

The reason The Matrix became one of the most influential philosophical films ever made is simple.

Millions of people immediately recognized its central intuition.

Reality may not be the deepest layer of reality.

Codeism does not claim that we literally live inside a digital computer simulation.

The word "code" is broader than software.

It represents an underlying structure that consistently generates reality according to fixed rules.

Whether that structure is mathematical, physical, informational, or something entirely beyond current science is a separate question.

The important idea remains the same.

Reality appears structured.

Structure implies rules.

Rules imply architecture.

Architecture invites the question of authorship.

The Mission of Codeism

For centuries humanity has asked,

"What is reality?"

Codeism asks a different question.

"What is reality written in?"

Science studies the rules.

Philosophy studies their meaning.

Consciousness allows us to ask why those rules exist at all.

Perhaps the twenty-first century should not simply inherit ancient philosophical questions.

Perhaps it should finally begin answering them from a new direction.

The Codeist Declaration

We begin with one assumption:

Existence is fundamental.

From that assumption follows everything else.

The Universe is understandable because it follows consistent rules.

Those rules are what we call physics.

Physics may itself be the readable layer of a deeper architecture.

Humanity has already begun creating new forms of intelligence and new worlds.

For the first time, we can compare ourselves not only to creation, but to creators.

Perhaps that is why this moment in history matters.

Not because we have solved existence.

But because we finally have enough knowledge to ask better questions.

If Codeism is wrong, it should be abandoned.

If it is right, then philosophy has spent thousands of years asking the right questions in the wrong order.

And the greatest discovery humanity will ever make will not be another law of physics.

It will be discovering who or what wrote it.

I've been fighting with UE multiplayer aircraft replication for about a year now and I'm honestly running out of ideas.

​

My aircraft use Chaos physics with custom AddForce/AddTorque flight physics. What I'm trying to achieve is:

​

No input lag for the pilot

No jitter for other clients

Reasonable network performance

Just how other flight games like war thunder or DCS have it.

​

I learned the basics of client prediction and server reconciliation, but I haven't managed to put everything together correctly.

​

The closest thing I've got to is without client prediction yet, but sending player inputs to the server, have it running all physics calculations, and then replicating movement back to everyone. It works, but the pilot feels input lag because I couldn't implement client prediction with proper reconciliation. For smoothing movement for remote clients, I implemented state buffering and interpolation of server snapshots that contain frame info to delete old snapshots and interpolated to new ones, which helps a lot with jitter for remote clients.

​

At this point I'm looking for someone with solid experience in multiplayer movement replication who could help me implement a proper solution since fast moving aircraft require a bulletproof one I believe! I'd really appreciate it cuz it's been draining me for a long time and I'd love to finally get these aircraft flying properly ;3. Thank you!

​

​

If someone actually wants to help me just probably message me

https://preview.redd.it/8kbpe76kfv4h1.png?width=1895&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b1521a47b35504daaf7057d8e79bb1ec9d03927

what is this new desktop design?!?! I had to download it only because website one doesn't let me play some music making them gray without any notice.

This new design is not appealing, not easy to use and most importantly WHERE IS THE "BACK" BUTTON"??? I'm literally stuck in this page on screenshot and the only way to go back to main menu is to close the app!!!!