u/True-Quote-6520

I don't really understand why people think religious books can prove the existence of God. Have you actually read them? A book, by itself, cannot prove whether God exists or not. This applies to every religion. At best, we can assume some of these texts were written by thoughtful or wise individuals shaped by their time and culture. But I don't understand why people treat them as unquestionable frameworks for how everyone should live. A lot of these systems were also designed to create order, obedience, and collective identity. It's psychologically safer to follow something pre-written than to confront uncertainty and think independently. The human brain naturally prefers cognitive ease over deeply questioning things for itself, why people take the account that human nature utterly relies on selfish motive, but not inherently bad they can do anything to save their species or own selves, which is another proof that this type of book exists, I mean even well thought book sounds like it's made for enlightenment but it's not necessarily meant to direct those stuff to a godly figure.Navigating existence without a predefined framework requires immense cognitive effort and forces an individual to confront existential dread and moral ambiguity, which most of the people not have courage to do.

Edit: My original point wasn't that religious people are stupid or weak. It's that human cognition naturally gravitates toward frameworks that reduce uncertainty. Religion is remarkably well designed for that purpose. Recognizing that psychological function doesn't require accepting its metaphysical claims as true.That's all I was saying.

I don't really understand why people think religious books can prove the existence of God. Have you actually read them? A book, by itself, cannot prove whether God exists or not. This applies to every religion. At best, we can assume some of these texts were written by thoughtful or wise individuals shaped by their time and culture. But I don't understand why people treat them as unquestionable frameworks for how everyone should live. A lot of these systems were also designed to create order, obedience, and collective identity. It's psychologically safer to follow something pre-written than to confront uncertainty and think independently. The human brain naturally prefers cognitive ease over deeply questioning things for itself, why people take the account that human nature utterly relies on selfish motive, but not inherently bad they can do anything to save their species or own selves, which is another proof that this type of book exists, I mean even well thought book sounds like it's made for enlightenment but it's not necessarily meant to direct those stuff to a godly figure.Navigating existence without a predefined framework requires immense cognitive effort and forces an individual to confront existential dread and moral ambiguity, which most of the people not have courage to do.

I am 21, an INFJ 5w4. From the start, I have always found myself kinda resonating with INTJs, and they also liked talking to me because I'm not really among the feeler type of INFJs. Having high cognitive ability makes me balance between my rational and emotional side. Similarly, I found this INTJ from another country. It's been almost 570+ days. Although we had a long break due to many reasons, we started talking again. She is 19 INTJ 3w4.

I like her worldview and how rationally and logically she brings things up from time to time. As for me, I'm not very touchy-feely and often get overwhelmed by constant calls and messages. I asked her to message me only during the night or anytime when she is absolutely free to talk to me. I even asked her to create a schedule because I'm on vacation, so I'm flexible throughout the day. She says that we are super excited to talk to me, but when I message her, after a few seconds she is gone, which I don't like , Considering what she has gone through childhood makes me feel more love towards her.

She also doesn't want me to worry about her much, which isn't possible for me at all. She is my love, and I do care about her. So similarly, this previous evening we talked about how we could bring predictability and consistency to the way we talk, and we came to the conclusion that she is free at night time.

The next day was her birthday, which is today. I had planned to give her a website that I made for her. I believe no one has ever made something like that for birthday, I wanted to watch her reaction at 12:00, while I am on call. So I waited for that time. I even had a plan to call her, but I didn't call her without asking first, so I waited because we have a 1.5-hour time difference. Since she had a fever, I thought she must be feeling dizzy or something. Although she previously explained to me that she still wants to talk to me even when feeling dizzy, I thought it was fine.

But by this time, it had already been 12 hours without us talking to each other. Now it's been 28 hours since we last talked. It hurts more because it's her birthday, and I wanted to see her happy. I don't know if her fever got worse or something, but wouldn't people at least tell their partner how they are doing if they were in a relationship? No matter how ill you are? Especially when you know that person cares about you a lot?

I am really angry and trying to cool down right now. I always said, "Be upfront. Don't keep things in your head," because I know she hides a lot.