u/Trynabeanintrovert

It is high time people stop victimising themselves just to gain freebies. Stop looking at discrimination through a single, isolated lens. Discrimination happens literally everywhere and in countless forms—people face prejudice for their body size, shape, facial features, skin tone, financial status, social class, regional background, state, country, and race.

Given how universal human bias and hardship are, how is it logical to shine a massive spotlight on only one form of historical grievance while granting arbitrary handouts under the guise of supporting the oppressed?

If a person comes from a poor or backward background, the most effective and empowering intervention a government can make is to provide free education, foundational resources, and financial scaffolding from primary school onward. It is an entirely different—and deeply flawed—matter to hand over seats in critical, high-stakes professions to candidates simply based on identity rather than merit, effectively bypassing individuals who have spent years sacrificing and working hard to score exceptional marks (600–700+).

If the primary objective of these policies is representation for the majority or social engineering, why bother holding competitive national exams at all?

What is the point of a rigorous entrance test if students securing extremely low or negative marks (such as — 40 or — 12) are funneled into critical professional courses, what do you want to show? That they're at least not scoring — 400?. What exactly is this supposed to prove? That a system is "inclusive" even if it compromises professional competence? If a doctor or an engineer is admitted based on low thresholds rather than rigorous capability, the long-term cost is paid by society at large.

And the irony is that these same people were crying about paper leaks.

Just because it was "illegal" and they have the audacity to admit their selectivity and feel superior about speaking trash but on the ground reality on the basis of morality and ethics what's exactly the difference between students who qualified their exams through paper leak and those who qualified it because their ancestors got oppressed 500+ years ago.

In modern classrooms across the country, teachers of all backgrounds teach students, and children of all communities sit together, play together, and share lunch. Grassroots integration is happening naturally among the younger generations.

Instead of fostering unity, certain political and coaching-industry stakeholders exploit historical grievances simply to protect their own interests, keep identity politics alive, and maintain relevance.

The worst part is how a sense of entitlement has taken root. Certain groups begin to view public resources and institutional seats as birthrights rather than achievements earned through competitive excellence.

True Equality Means Equal Opportunity, Not Equal Outcomes without equal hardwork.

Invest heavily in rural schooling, primary healthcare, nutritional security, and coaching accessibility so that a child from a remote village has the exact same competitive capability as someone from a metro city.

Once the starting line is fair, the finish line must be judged purely on effort, capability, and talent. Compromising merit in high-skill sectors helps no one—neither the individual admitted under arbitrary relaxations nor the public who relies on their expertise.

Discrimination cannot be fought by introducing new forms of systemic unfairness. It is time we demand a system based on economic need and pure merit, rather than perpetual division.

Some people would come here talking about how SC/ST act is not a poverty elevating scheme but then their whole argument is "poor SC/ST from villages didn't have right to education. They don't have resources either so they deserve to eat the seats of wealthy Brahmins who had access to education and resources since forever." Expecting logic from them is the last thing I want to do but can the GC stop being blind and being okay with whatever it happening? We can raise our voices.

Imagine being so obsessed with a woman to an extent where even after the show ends, you still feel the need to shame people—especially women—connected to her, just like your idols do. You do not even know if they are friends. Still, you attack them because your so-called idols and self-proclaimed "main character winners" could not compete against her. They even lack the looks and character to be a good side character. They even lost after the show brought them back following an eviction. Pathetic and shameful. And when people call out AK. It's suddenly attack, obsession, face shaming, look shaming.

This is the same so-called paid and biased reviewer of Akanksha who shamed Shreya for sharing her CSA story and called it a "sympathy stunt."

She blamed Ruru for being cheated on. Yeah. She said that it's her fault.

But suddenly, her feminism gets awakened whenever AK gets cheated on or whenever she shares her SA stories.

I would give her the benefit of a doubt if her reactions and mentality stayed the same for everyone, but at this point, no one can convince me that she's not a paid PR because it's clear as fuck.

And lastly, those so-called girls in that particular sub who claim to be a "girl's girl" and always talk about blaming Yogesh and not Akanksha on rare days—because on even days, they defend both of them and justify their actions. The same people who do "women, women" all day are sharing this selectively immoral chick’s take and justifying it.

Like, wtf!? It's literally as clear as water at this point. Suddenly, that sub has been filled with hate posts for Shreya and appreciation posts for AK.

And that one other sub—( Lockupppofficial )—this one is clear as fuck. You don't have to abuse anyone or argue with them. Just question one of the posters supporting AK and say anything that's against her fans or her. Not even clearly, just a question. You'll be banned permanently. Like, how can someone stoop so low?

I don't understand one thing about those who criticize rishabh— shreya can have thousand flaws but how does a cheater feel contended after calling a loyal man "rental bf" and how is it an attitude thing for his so called fans? ( coming from a man btw ) when I look at rishab ( obviously I don't know him personally ) ever since I've started watching lock up, I realise how much he supports Shreya and stands up for her always. That's honestly a sign of a loyal partner. It honestly makes me feel like such a rare thing it is.

I'm not someone who consumes their content frequently or even someone who knew them before but definitely it feels good and I wonder why many women support that duo of cheater x side chick and abuse these people.

I've seen some men making reels about how he's fake and stuff but it honestly just makes me think one thing — Those who see themselves in cheaters and side chicks and those who support them will always find a loyal person performative.

By the way, I'm a man earning on my own while studying and I've worked as a writer in a lot of projects — I sing too and planning to release my own music after some time so I don't need to be someone's pr to earn money or express what I feel ( not sorry to break it to you at all delulu haggu fans ) and yeah that's a fact.

And in those other subs where AK and Y is running their PR. I don't even see a justification of their actions and just hate for others. I honestly feel like how can some people stoop so low for some money. Especially these grown ass women and girls. Honestly shameful.

Recently I've seen a post in that feminist sub where a user posted about how women are the one who get targetted always in these political fight.

I've seen people there acting like — Brahmins are the utter misogynist/patriarchal people while poor SC/ST men have been born with revolution for equality in their veins and blood. They are feminist.

Except for few people no one there has called out hate towards Brahmin and disrespect for brahmin women and even at times someone calls it out. There would be thousands of posts following it telling how it is casteist that someone specifically made a post about calling out abuse happening towards Brahmin girl and how it's a proof that casteism still exists in THAT FEMINIST SUB.

While when it comes to SC/ST men and women abusing Brahmins it always becomes "it's not about caste. It's about blah blah blah and blah."

And even I saw a lot women defending that stance of dalit men wanting brahmin women. Sure if someone wants to marry them but not sorry to break it to you. Even in an arrange marriage If a women gives someone rights to find a groom according to her preference like her parents. Her parents' literally have rights to find a groom they find worthy of their daughter and the one she likes.

This idea that "Inter-caste" marriages will solve the problem of casteism is peak bullshit because it clearly implies you see yourself as "inferior". The ask for removing surnames is also the same thing— it proves that you find your identity "inferior".

Because it's similar to black people saying —

"Remove race to end racism"

Or

"A black person marrying a white person will solve the problem of racism"

which is clearly not the case because. Why would you consider yourself as inferior and always throw it on others to make up for it?

And why would you demean Brahmins solely? Why would you ask for their women? What about the SCs who aren't ready to marry STs?

You feel the oppression? You take the reservation? You are OPEESSED? You want to remove casteism?

Why don't you start it from your home?

Why don't you ask SCs to marry lower SCs and not discriminate them?

And why would you ask for brahmin girls?

Why not brahmin men? Why not two people of same gender to marry each other?

Main bolu — Give your mother, daughter, sister, grandma to brahmins and accept that Brahmins are superior and you can't compete with them and then take 100% reservation. No problem. I'll be shamed and jailed. I'll be called a casteist.

Even If I just say "I'm proud of being a brahmin"

Someone will take offense to that and throw the accuse of me oppressing them. Doing casteism.

But —

What's with JAAT and YADAVS flexing their castes in MVs or wherever they go. Brahmins don't see a problem with that?

Why so much hypocrisy?

And don't worry. I'm not expecting support from here and I don't even want it but just wanted to show you the mirror if your feminism and morality is so selective then it's just NOT Feminism and you're far from being moral.

Jai shri ram 🙏🏻 ( jisko offense lena hai lelo )

The audacity of these haggu fans to call the show biased towards Shreya even after they called this failure back after he failed to survive on the show and got evicted.

Hey everyone, I need to vent about a promotional reel I just came across for the book SHIVADHYA: The Lethal Love by author_riona, because it perfectly highlights a trend in modern indie romance/dark romance that drives me absolutely insane.

I’ve attached the screenshots from the reel so you can see the exact text being hyped up. We see the classic trope setup: the male lead, Shiv, trying to control his "dirty thoughts" because they aren't married yet. fair. But then you slide over to the other one, and the author writes this:

"Her roaming in his room in reveling clothes to break his rules and made him do ✨it✨ before the marriage. So that she can 'test' him if he can pass for marriage or not."

I’m sorry, but what kind of absolute garbage writing and logic is this? Since when did love, emotional compatibility, or mutual respect get completely thrown out the window, replaced entirely by "he has to be good in bed to qualify for marriage"?

What bothers me the most is that these authors advertise these characters as "baddies" or "strong, independent women." Breaking someone's boundaries, invading their space ("roaming in his room"), and intentionally manipulating them into breaking their own rules just to "test" their sexual performance isn't being a badass. It’s toxic, manipulative, and incredibly shallow.

***Let’s play a quick game:*** Switch the genders.

Imagine a male lead deliberately invading a woman's room in revealing clothes, intentionally trying to break her personal boundaries, and forcing a sexual situation just to "test" if her body or performance "passes" for marriage. The entire comments section would rightfully be calling it out as predatory, toxic, and worse than basic misogyny. But because a female character is doing it under the guise of being a "boss girl" or an "empowered baddie," it gets celebrated with sparkles and crying emojis in the captions.

And I don't even care if someone wants to read this. They can.

But then these people and their readers are the first one to hate people who write weak fls or other tropes that they personally don't like and try to portray themselves as if they are morally superior.

We are accumulating a really warped, strange idea of what a strong woman looks like in fiction. A strong female character shouldn't need to rely on boundary stomping and treating her partner like a disposable test-drive vehicle to show she has agency. It just makes the character look deeply insecure and toxic, and honestly, it ruins the romance before it even starts.

Can we get back to romance books where the characters actually like each other as human beings?

Hey everyone,

I’ve been writing for about four years now and have managed to build a pretty solid audience on Wattpad. One of my books actually crossed 11.6M reads, and I’ve just started working on a second one.

While I’m incredibly grateful for the traction there, we all know Wattpad’s primary vibe: it’s heavily dominated by dark romance, YA, and fantasy fiction.

Lately, I’ve been wanting to shift gears and write something entirely different—more of a classic, moral-message-based story.

However, I want to keep these two worlds completely separated. I don’t think my current Wattpad audience is the right fit for this new direction, and I want to start fresh.

Just like Wattpad is the go-to for teenager-centric tropes, I’m looking for a platform that caters to a crowd that appreciates more classic storytelling.

My goal is to build a dedicated readership for this new style before I eventually look into publishing it.

I know people use Instagram, but honestly, it feels like it's only good for short snippets, and I've never tapped into it for promotions and stuff and I have absolutely no clue how to market myself or push content there anyway.

Does anyone have recommendations for platforms where slower-paced, classic, or message-driven fiction actually thrives?