Astrology book recs?
93!
Pretty much the title. I'd like to get a decent knowledge of astrology, so i can interpret my natal chart. I have no idea where to start. (General tips on that would be great too)
93 93/93
93!
Pretty much the title. I'd like to get a decent knowledge of astrology, so i can interpret my natal chart. I have no idea where to start. (General tips on that would be great too)
93 93/93
93
So I'm thinking of joining the OTO, because I'm searching for a community of like-minded people. But I keep hearing from people who are either not in the order (go figure) or people who claim to have been members in the past, that it is just a pedophilic sex cult. On the other hand, I hear people who are members saying that it's not. Which is it? Is the crazy stuff only in the higher degrees? Does it vary from lodge to lodge?
Please forgive me if my questions are dumb, I'm just trying to get an honest answer.
93 93/93
93
So... questions:
For those of you who have done all of the yoga stuff in Liber E, which pose would you choose? For me it's between the dragon and the god, and Im leaning dragon. However, I heard someone say "don't do dragon. Iykyk". Why not? It seems fine.
Second, I have pain, obv, but not "I am hurting myself". It's more "this is hard". So what's the timeline of the pain look like? Does it stop being hard after a while? Does it get worse before it gets better?
Third, how long should I wait before incorporating Pranayama?
93 93/93
Pretty much the title. Preferably a pdf
Not looking to become a master but just to understand the basics and how to use that practically
We all know about the LBRP (and personally, I am tired of hearing about it) as being necessary for banishing.
But magick has been around since the birth of civilization, and the Golden Dawn was only founded in 1888. It follows then that there must have been some ritual used before the Golden Dawn for banishing.
Do you guys know of anything like this? I really want to find something new.
Ok so in LLPSI Chapter 18 line 36-38 it says
"Magister, quī puerōs legere docet, ipse et librōs Latīnōs et Græcōs legere potest, *nam is utramque linguam scit*."
The "linguam" is throwing me off because it's accusative singular, even though it's taking about "both" languages. It's there a reason why it isn't plural "utramque linguās"?
Also I just got back into latin after a break so it might be related to that so sorry if this is a dumb question
I know it's really inconsequential but I need to know😭😭