u/Vinicentian

BVF Cartier Santos Medium 35mm SS

• ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/VW5V4Aa
• ⁠Index alignment: Printed dial
• ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
• ⁠Hand Alignment: Can't tell from pictures
• ⁠Bezel: Good

• ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d, 261 degrees, error 0.1ms - looks good

Looks good to me, but would really appreciate a second set of eyes. Thanks in advance!

• ⁠Dealer name: Angela
• ⁠Factory name: BVF
• ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Santos Medium 35mm SS
• ⁠Price Paid: $385 (shipped)
• ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/VW5V4Aa
• ⁠Index alignment: Printed dial
• ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
• ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• ⁠Hand Alignment: Can't tell from pictures
• ⁠Bezel: Good
• ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d, 261 degrees, error 0.1ms - looks good

• ⁠Anything else you notice: Second watch after I RL'd the first one for dust inside the case. This one looks fine to me. Can't see a reason to RL but would love a second opinion. Thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer Name: Angela
2. ⁠Factory Name: BVF
3. ⁠Model Name: Cartier Santos de Cartier 35mm SS White Dial A9015 V2
4. ⁠Price Paid: $385 USD shipping included
5. ⁠Album: https://imgur.com/a/yanuHyK
6. ⁠Index alignment: Printed dial
7. ⁠Dial Printing: There is a white dot in the middle of the 10. I can't tell if it's a print error or a dust particle since it changes shape in pics. Will ask about this.
8. ⁠Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: n/a
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Can't tell because no video but honestly, a slight misalignment is something I'm okay with if it does happen to exist. I've requested a video so I'll check when I get it.
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks good.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SEL): n/a
12. ⁠Timegrapher Numbers: Requested, but I'm sure they'll be fine.
13. ⁠Anything Else You Noticed: First QC for a watch. Just looking for a second, more seasoned, set of eyes to take a look. Biggest concern is speck on 10. Does this warrant a RL?