u/Willing-Stay-3498

I really don’t know if this is specific to INFJs in general but what I noticed about other subs compared to many other subs is that there’s rarely any downvotes here 😂

My theory is we tend to understand more perspectives than most so not a lot of perspectives really surprise us or would give us a reason to differ.

I would say though when it’s soemthing completely
Asinine I have no problem downvoting

I think you really have to grind my gears if order for me to downvote I don’t downvote just to downvote lol

What you guys think?

I was thinking about any possible Loba buffs since she hasn’t had anything updated in awhile.

But I also wanted a buff that doesn’t completely change her kit because personally i think her kit is fine

I think she can be a bit underwhelming in the rank scene and if she’s able to do this with her black market

Maybe it’ll see a uptick in pick rate

What you guys think?

Idk if this is a INFJ thing at all but I was having a conversation with a friend about sex and we were talking about casual sex and she asked me if I ever had casual sex and I told her no. Idk what it is but I just cant do it, maybe it’s the wiring within my brain but something within me just cannot have sex with someone I don’t have a mental connection with.

I can’t even get turned on if there is no mental connection

And even if sex does happen with the person I do have chemistry with I would just want a relationship

Im not so sure if this is strictly a INFJ thing but im just curious to know how you guys feel about the topic.

I’ve been noticing something in schools that honestly doesn’t sit right with me, and I feel like people don’t really talk about it the way they should.

There are situations where boundaries between staff and students just aren’t as clear as they need to be. I’ve seen students get way too comfortable around certain staff, walking in and out whenever they want, getting physically close, even initiating contact. And instead of it being shut down immediately, it gets brushed off or ignored like it’s not a big deal.

That’s where it starts to become a problem.

It’s not always something extreme. Sometimes it’s the smaller things that build up over time and create an environment that just feels off. Students having too much access to certain staff, physical contact not being clearly addressed, communication that starts to blur lines, and situations that other staff notice but nothing ever really gets said about it.

And I’m going to be honest, if a male staff member was involved in some of these same situations, I think it would be taken way more seriously. But when it’s the other way around, it feels like it gets minimized or explained away.

I’m not saying every situation means something inappropriate is happening. But I do think schools should be way more strict and proactive when it comes to boundaries before anything escalates. Because once something does happen, people start asking why no one said anything earlier.

At the end of the day, this is about protecting students, protecting staff, and keeping things professional. Boundaries shouldn’t be optional.

I’m curious if anyone else working in schools has noticed this or if I’m just overthinking it.

I really think the NBA is starting to underrate having a real point guard.

And I’m not talking about a shooting guard who just brings the ball up. I mean a real PG someone who controls pace, gets people easy shots, organizes the offense, and keeps the team from looking lost when the game slows down.

Look at the Pacers. They made the 2025 NBA Finals, and Tyrese Haliburton was basically the brain of that whole team. In 2024-25 he averaged 18.6 points and 9.2 assists, and the Pacers had a 118.3 offensive rating with him. Then he tears his Achilles in Game 7 of the Finals, misses the whole 2025-26 season, and Indiana falls to 18-61, second-worst in the league at that point. That’s not a small drop. That’s basically proof of how much structure a true PG gives a team.

And yeah, I know teams can win without a “traditional” point guard. But usually those teams have an elite offensive hub somewhere else Jokic, LeBron, Luka, Shai, Tatum, etc. Basically somebody still has to run the offense.

That’s why I look at teams like the Pistons, Magic, Rockets, Hawks, and even other young playoff teams, and I think the next step is not always “get another scorer.” Sometimes the next step is getting someone who makes the offense easier.

The playoffs expose this badly. In the regular season, athleticism and talent can win you games. But in the playoffs, defenses adjust, pace slows down, and half-court offense matters way more. That’s where a true PG becomes valuable.

Even this season, Cade Cunningham led point guards with 634 total assists and averaged 9.9 assists, which shows how much Detroit’s offense depends on having one real organizer. But it also shows the bigger point if your whole offense depends on one guy creating everything, you better either have an elite PG or build the roster like you understand how important that role is.

So my point isn’t “you can’t win without a true PG.”

My point is this

A lot of teams are trying to skip steps. They want wings, scorers, spacing, defense, all that. And that matters. But if nobody can actually control the game, settle the team down, and create easy shots when playoff basketball gets ugly, you’re going to hit a ceiling.

For teams like Detroit, Orlando, Houston, and Atlanta, I think the blueprint should be simple either get a real point guard, or make sure your best player can function like one. Because talent gets you to the playoffs, but structure is what helps you survive once you’re there.