Study ranks “intimacy/making love” as the single highest source of momentary happiness at 14.20 - far above socializing, exercise, or anything else

Study ranks “intimacy/making love” as the single highest source of momentary happiness at 14.20 - far above socializing, exercise, or anything else

Circumcision permanently blunts that peak for us.

This table measures average happiness while people are doing common activities (not long-term life meaning).

(Bryson & MacKerron, 2017)

Among all the things people actually spend time doing, intimacy/making love sits alone at the top with a coefficient of 14.20. Exercise lands around 8.12. Talking, chatting, socializing is 6.38. Everything else trails further behind. Nothing else comes close to the intensity of that peak. Sex isn’t “just one part of life.” According to the data on what people feel in the moment, it is the single strongest source of experienced happiness people ever get. For many of us, though, that peak is strongly diminished. Some men are left with a more severe circumcision that took huge portions of the frenulum and left only tight, scarred skin behind.

When some inactivists shrug and say “there’s more to life than sex” or dismiss the whole thing as no big deal, they are not really understanding what was denied from us. They’re minimizing a permanent loss of sensation and function that many of us still feel every day, and in doing so they only deepen the isolation for those of us who refuse to pretend the damage never happened.

Circumcised men need to stop treating this like a gentle-parenting debate and start taking the permanent harm seriously. We need to outlaw it now, the same way FGM is banned, and put our energy behind the intactivist organizations that refuse any compromise and demand a complete end to the practice.

reddit.com
u/ballistic762 — 1 day ago

Video of AZ Regret Mother who was present for the procedure later shares footage of her son’s recovery. This is what “they didn’t know any better” looks like

Rare find here from a deleted series of posts, showing that even in the mid-2020's RIC is ongoing while declining. An older millennial mom took her first son in to get circumcised at a pediatric clinic. She was in the room for it and said she’d never heard him scream like that. It shook her.

Later that night she’s holding him while he’s asleep in her arms and his breathing is all labored and stressed. This infant already went through hell and he’s going to be dealing with the pain for weeks.

I just finished the POTS interview where u/cartersteinhoff talks about how people infantilize the mothers in these situations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZSdmYNMs6o It’s one thing to talk about “they don’t know any better,” but watching her go through with it with no real critical-thinking amazes me.

The post was deleted from the IG mom's account due to shame, she regrets what she did.

I honestly didn’t get the infantilization critique until I saw this. That’s why I think this needs to be shared more. A lot of people still default to the soft version of the story where parents are just confused or misled. Footage like this cuts through that. It describes the decision, the infant suffering, and the aftermath all in one place. If it opened my eyes the way it did, it can do the same for others who are still stuck in the excuses.

reddit.com
u/ballistic762 — 3 days ago

Do circumcising US Pediatric Doctors & Nurses spare their own sons?

Do the American pediatricians obstetricians, and nurses who routinely cut healthy foreskins off screaming newborn boys actually subject their own sons to the same procedure after they’ve watched it up close, day after day?
I heard both /u/cartersteinhoff & /u/adkisojk mention in some older podcasts that some physicians know the anatomy they’re removing isn’t “just a little skin.” But then other Intactivists I follow say the doctors truly don’t know and follow AAP guidelines and protocol (photo above of real Ped NP. For example, Dr. Andrew Freedman (a pediatric urologist at Cedars-Sinai in Los Angeles) has publicly stated that he circumcised his own son himself on his parents’ kitchen table on the eighth day for religious reasons, citing “3,000 years of ancestors looking over my shoulder.” Was it a clamp or just a quick Bris loose cut? I think some physicians know it’s densely innervated. Yet many of them still perform the cut for parents who request it, citing the 2012 AAP statement that “the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks.”
That same AAP statement carefully stops short of recommending routine circumcision for all boys.

If the clinicians who perform circumcisions truly believe the procedure is net beneficial after watching it, they should have no hesitation subjecting their own sons. I’m just trying to figure out if it’s “circumcision for thee, but not for me” or if this is unfounded conspiracy from John and others. Any help on this subject is appreciated and I’ve already donated to Intact America, and plan to continue.

u/ballistic762 — 5 days ago