u/cat-consumed-chicken

do ppl actually like their sexed bodies?

​

like do heterosexual men and women like seeing their own bodies in the mirror?

does it depend on whether they are conventionally attractive or not?

also, if someone's heterosexual how do they even instincually feel their bodies as "attractive"/"repulsive"? for me this is has always been a mental process of observation of how ppl rate male bodies, but instinctually i feel as repulsed by a conventually attractive male body as much as by an unattractive one.

transitioning helped at first, because for the first time i had an internal compass of how i want my body to look because im attracted to women. it helped me love myself a little.

but i quickly hit the major issue, faces are the most gendered thing for me, and my face was always going to be a man's face. so its not really possible for me to consider my face "attractive", not because of self esteem, but because its male, and male faces just can never look attractive to me.

detransitioning works as long as i dont think about my looks that much. (which was wat ive been doing all my life before transitioning). but then i want to be attractive to the category of ppl (or even a single person from that category) im attracted to. my brain just short circuits.

it feels very frustrating because i feel like the only true heterosexual person ive known. i cant imagine knowing wat is an attractive man without being slightly bi myself, and im just not. like at all.

reddit.com
▲ 3 r/askAGP

i think agp is a limited construct

a lot of AGPs view it as an integral part of their orientation.

ive spend years trying to shoehorn in either "AGP as a sexuality" or "innate gender identity" as reasons for the pull ive had towards feminization (very late onset). but neither really fit.

here's what i think is my case:

- i grew up very heteroromantic and heterosexual, but more accurately i'd say "exclusively attracted to women". my "identity" was never initially part of my sexuality.

i say this because i do think many heterosexual men (e.g. red pill) are very auto-androphillic. they really enjoy the idea of being a man having sex with a woman or in a relationship with a woman. this seems so obvious to me, because i have no autoandrophila at all (and esp. not when it comes to my body). the concept is alien to me and always has been. even some AGPs (like the recently retransitioning youtuber Rae/Ray) seem to have some degree of autoandrophilia in some settings.

- women generally dont find me attractive. and the few times they have, i cant really figure out if its real or if they are mistaken about how they feel (even the sex i had i dont really know why it happened [from the woman's POV]).

- my autoandrophobia resulted clearly from this feeling of undesirability. not from some latent sexual orientation hidden for decades.

- transitioning (to relieve it) didnt really help. body feels better and softer, yes, but that doesnt feel like AGP to me. just the way a heterosexual (non-autoandrophilic) brain would react to having softer skin.

- i detransitioned, not because of "gender", but because i identify strongly with a non-autoandrophilic version of heterosexuality (im attracted to women as "me", not as "a man" or a "woman"). also trans lesbianism & agp pseudo-bisexuslity sound incredibly depressing to me because they are hugely autosexual.

- going through a lot of therapy id say im more neutral now about my body (which is how i started anyway). however, the neutrality feels dangerous because women dont find my natural body attractive and "masculinizing" doesnt even make sense to me because i dont even have the right mental map for it (because i have zero androphilia and zero auto-androphilia).

TLDR; i think the complete lack of androphila and autoandrophilia + lack of perceived visceral desire from women can cause gender dysphoria and agp. but they remain as symptoms (or sexual subconscious "strategies"), not real causes (for me anyway).

thoughts?

reddit.com
u/cat-consumed-chicken — 2 days ago

uber-patriarchal men v. women's sexuality

i thought id look up the most conservative non-western view on women's sexuality i could find [orthodox islamic fatwa site citing centries-dead clerics].

they seem confused about it from what i see.

i also find it a bit ironic that the one cited to be against the idea of super horny women didnt cite common sense or common knowledge, but the idea that "they (theologically) couldn't be" because god gave men all these "outlets" for sex.

though id have to wonder if the myth of women being hypersexual was just a tool for societal control (to justify to individual men why they need to keep their women in check and not trust them entirely, otherwise they'd fuck all their friends and neighbors or something).

disclaimer: i know muslims today live differently obviously. my focus is on the old patriarchal structure (which has existed in some form everywhere, see: old testament etc). some antifeminist men seem to idealize it for some reason. but i think its healthier for both sexes to view it from a lens of inhereted trauma [as in: ur great great great grand parents probably either did or have endured some nasty stuff, because it was normalized]. sorry different topic.

thoughts?

u/cat-consumed-chicken — 2 days ago

non-binary male heterosexuality?

can male heterosexuality find meaningful existence outside the binary of feminism/blue-to-purple pill & red-to-black pill/patriarchy?

let me try ... 🤔

cylinder of ... umm .. cyclical emissions?

u/cat-consumed-chicken — 3 days ago

sexuality as context

i randomly remembered this video i watched years ago. it baffled me at the time, but i admit i do love Eve Lupine and women who give sex positive + autism vibes because they tend to explain things better for my very sexually male brain.

i want u to think of what she describes not as an exception to women but as a point on multiple spectra: asexuality (graysexuality in her case), kink (D/S for her).

most men (and not to be transphobic, but anyone who goes through male puberty imo) dont act as if context as part of their orientation but something adjascent to it.

although most women wont go as far as to affirm what im saying here, i still think its conceptually useful to think of context as an integral part of a woman's sexual orientation. [either that or comp-het or some mix of both, which makes knowing any woman's "true" orientation extremely difficult, because u need to do be aware of honest mistranslation (what remains if u remove the contextuality from her sexual-self narrative?) in addition to lack of self-awareness due to comp-het societal brainwashing]

https://youtu.be/NdxjQpuOmEo

u/cat-consumed-chicken — 3 days ago