With all the hype around haaland, this is a reminder that we've got our own monster in the making

With all the hype around haaland, this is a reminder that we've got our own monster in the making

He will hopefully come even better 🤞

u/chrosoka — 9 hours ago

We have to acknowledge the flaws in our judgement

​

This is a message to myself first and foremost tbh.

Human beings generally tend to perceive things being easy or easier whenever they see other people do it. With how much passion and emotions there is in football, we tend to believe that our judgment can't be mistaken.

"What are you talking about, bring tchouameni, he's a megastar way better than any other target".

But here we have to unfortunately steal a leaf from liverpools book.

I remember back then all liverpool fans AND KLOPP wanted Julian Brandt, but the analysis and data team had way different and astonishingly better idea. They bought salah. Because underneath all the hype, what wins is the analytical model of fitting in the right profile of players into the system.

Again still pealing off the scourers book, I remember when they were rebuilding their entire midfield, they bought macallister, szobozlai, granverberch and endu. I was really confused and excited bcz I thought surely that's their downfall. Who's their matic, who's their kante, the destroyer, the ball stealer. In my mind I just adore those types of players and think any system without them is fragile.

However, when I saw szobo allister and granvenberch running like mad dogs latching onto players and annoying the life out of them, I was really astonished by that. They're a menace, they don't rest and let no one rest.

So the moral of my story is that, none of us wanted chicharito, or anderson or park ji song. But at the same time, none of us true manutd fans can express how much we adore those players. Who'd you rather have had, another di maria like shiny striker or another chicharito?

To bring this to our midfield pursuit context, I'd rather a mad tidy dog like alex scott, running his ass off, fond of the club for choosing him, getting paid similar wages to his colleagues who are on the same kind of wages with no grudges, comparison and darama. Where effort is rewarded and status and money rise with sacrifice and hard work, rather than go looking for the perceived shiny object and be bullied by smaller teams who are playing smart.

Football is becoming a very competitive and dangerous business. Palace are winning trophies and going to europe. Same are brighton. Villa were fighting relegations 3-4 years ago and bar our recent 3rd finish they've been perceived superior to us, despite all our history.

We have to calm down and trust the process, that same process that bought us the amazing attacking trio we have now!!

reddit.com
u/chrosoka — 2 days ago

Because we're Manutd, we shouldn't overpay!!

Hear me out. The tension around the Spurs coup for our targets comes from two opposing points of view.

  1. We're absolutely right to avoid splashing this kind of cash, for several reasons. The biggest one is protecting our wage structure. The second is finally developing a spine as a football club.

  2. The problem during the Woodward era wasn't just spending big. It was spending big on the wrong players—players who fit the marketing strategy more than the on-pitch one.

Between the two views, I'm firmly on the INEOS side. Bruno said it perfectly on the Diary of a CEO podcast: we only want players who want to play for us.

We're Manchester United. We're not Spurs. We're not City or even Chelsea. We're a club with the richest history and some of the greatest glories in football. No amount of money will make a player carry the weight of this shirt, and no amount of money should lure a player away from it if they truly understand what this club means and what they're signing up for when they put on that shirt.

Beyond the sentimental value, it's also smart business. We should use the pull of the Manchester United name to attract the best players, buy well, build football success, and let the financial success follow. Woodward did the exact opposite.

No matter what, when Kobbie, Cunha, and Mbeumo have taken us from 15th to 3rd while earning around £160k a week on average, it's insanity—and frankly a disgrace—to reward a relegated midfielder with almost double their wages.

I trust INEOS on this one. Blindly.

We're the famous Manchester United... and they're just Spurs, lads.

Come on.

u/chrosoka — 5 days ago

Recurring dream about impulsively agreeing to marriage, then panicking at the wedding

Recurring dream about impulsively agreeing to marriage, then panicking at the wedding

Archetypal Dreams

I've had this recurring dream 3 or 4 times over the past 7 years. It's not frequent, but it's always essentially the same dream.

In it, I somehow agree to marry a woman almost on a whim. Usually someone suggests it, or it's done in a moment of excitement, and I think, "Why not?" without really considering what I'm agreeing to.

Then, when the wedding day arrives and the ceremony is actually about to begin, I suddenly realize the enormity of what I've done. I panic and think, "This is terrible. I don't even love this woman. I barely know her. Why did I agree to this?" From that point on, all I want to do is escape before the ceremony starts. The feeling is intense panic, like I've trapped myself in a life-defining commitment that I never truly wanted.

What's interesting is that the dream isn't about being forced into marriage. I always chose it myself, but almost absentmindedly or impulsively. The panic only comes when the commitment becomes real and irreversible.

I'd be interested to hear different interpretations rather than looking for one "correct" meaning.

reddit.com
u/chrosoka — 9 days ago
▲ 47 r/Dreams+1 crossposts

Recurring dream about impulsively agreeing to marriage, then panicking at the wedding

I've had this recurring dream 3 or 4 times over the past 7 years. It's not frequent, but it's always essentially the same dream.

In it, I somehow agree to marry a woman almost on a whim. Usually someone suggests it, or it's done in a moment of excitement, and I think, "Why not?" without really considering what I'm agreeing to.

Then, when the wedding day arrives and the ceremony is actually about to begin, I suddenly realize the enormity of what I've done. I panic and think, "This is terrible. I don't even love this woman. I barely know her. Why did I agree to this?" From that point on, all I want to do is escape before the ceremony starts. The feeling is intense panic, like I've trapped myself in a life-defining commitment that I never truly wanted.

What's interesting is that the dream isn't about being forced into marriage. I always chose it myself, but almost absentmindedly or impulsively. The panic only comes when the commitment becomes real and irreversible.

I'm curious how people familiar with Jungian psychology would approach this symbolically. Is the marriage itself likely to represent something other than literal marriage? And what might it mean that I willingly enter into it, only to desperately want to flee once it becomes real?

I'd be interested to hear different interpretations rather than looking for one "correct" meaning.

u/chrosoka — 9 days ago

Sounds lame, but how do you know that you're addicted, or that your addiction is a problem.

For a very long time, I’ve tried to have a healthy relationship with social lubricants. I’ve always despised them and built a lot of theories around how they should be withdrawn in order to unveil “true” relationships. The only healthy lubricant, after ruminating on this idea for years, seemed to be shared foundational principles/morals that two people build a relationship on top of.

At the same time, I can’t fully commit to that idea either, because life often feels so lame without these lubricants. Unfortunately, the stronger the lubricant is, the more powerful the pull feels, and the closer people seem to become because of it.

For example, I’ve never drank alcohol, but being in college, the FOMO around YOLO nights, club nights, and all that was absolutely decapitating. As a puer, it fueled this weird limbo state in me where I simultaneously despised that world and deeply wanted to dive headfirst into it. Later on, I realized this probably became part of my shadow.

Two years into college, I got into nicotine smoking, and ever since, I haven’t really been able to put that beast down no matter how hard I tried. It has lessened a lot, I’ve restricted it mostly to social events, sometimes hookah only, but to this day, I barely remember enjoying or even planning a social outing without nicotine attached to it somehow.

The sad part is that I already struggle to find friends I genuinely relate to and actually want to be around. But even then, no matter who it is, especially in the dopamine age we live in, being present with people who are themselves anxious, addicted, overstimulated, etc., without some kind of lubricant just feels… empty.

I also grew up in a household where my parents struggled immensely to enjoy life hedonically. They always leaned toward loving suffering itself and attaching meaning to sacrifice. They almost enjoyed cutting people off because they perceived it as noble, part of some “meaningful suffering.”

So my actual question is this:

Do I have to completely demonize nicotine?

Do I have to give it up entirely in order to adhere to my principles and actually unlock my potential?

Or is it okay if I keep it controlled and limited?

Because whenever I imagine cutting it off completely, I can only picture life becoming grey and lame while everyone else is still enjoying these dopamine-maxing moments or using them as crutches to go through life. Especially as a puer, I struggle to even envision those moments without nicotine attached to them somehow.

And this extends beyond nicotine too. It feels like every dopamine-potent thing becomes a catastrophic trap for someone with ADHD:

Sugar feels terrible. Nicotine feels terrible. Alcohol feels like a curse.

Sometimes it genuinely feels like conquering ADHD/puer tendencies is harder than what “normal” people can ever achieve.

I guess this is where concepts like libidinal energy come in. But even then, my brain keeps pointing out examples like Dr. K still playing video games despite openly discussing how they affected him negatively. So where is the line between healthy engagement and self-destruction or moral contradiction and self agency?

reddit.com
u/chrosoka — 2 months ago

Whoever comes in to replace Case will be a destroyer, someone there to do more of the dirty work for Kobe, although the latter has recently been a beast in all departments, with some immaculate defensive work too.

That being said, it seems like a lot of us have forgotten how terrible we looked without him vs Leeds.

Adam Wharton is not only Premier League proven, but he’s an outstanding through-ball player. It’s safe to say his talent might not be matched when it comes to that aspect.

Yes, playing them both might tip off our midfield balance, but that doesn’t mean they play the same style. Kobe is a tik-tik-tik-boom kind of player, while Adam is a slashing, sword kill out of nowhere type. Meaning he offers something different and adds to our arsenal of solutions, especially against low block teams.

Yes, he’ll be competing for Mainoo’s position, but with a 60-game season, there’ll be a place for everyone.

Don’t let others fool you with all the complex analysis and drama about what it takes to win the league. It takes almost flawless recruitment that stacks the squad with quality players. You elevate your team much more by raising its floor, rather than its ceiling.

The Gooners are about to win the league, and they get Madueke when they have Saka, Eze when they have Odegaard, Nørgaard when they have Rice, Zubimendi when they have Merino... I can go on for ages with examples from City and Livershit.

For those who think his fee is a problem, tbh it’s not. Him and Anderson/Tchouaméni can be our Cunha and Mbeumo of the midfield.

u/chrosoka — 2 months ago