Three cancers. Still winning.
A year ago I was sitting at my own desk when I found out I probably had cancer again.
There was no doctor in the room. No one was there at all. I had pulled up a radiology report from a scan I had done for something else, and I read it the way I have learned to read these things. Fast. Looking for the one line that matters. I found it near the bottom. A small mass on my right kidney. Mixed solid and cystic. About 1.4 centimeters. An outside read called it Bosniak III, the borderline category, the one where about half turn out to be cancer and half do not.
I have been a cancer patient long enough to know how the first hour goes. You read the words. You look up what they mean. You understand in the first thirty seconds that the news is bad, and then your body takes a minute to catch up. I sat there. I did not move. The thought that kept coming back was not dramatic. It was three words. Always fighting this.
I have been fighting this since I was sixteen.
In 1993, I had testicular cancer. I was a kid. I had four rounds of cisplatin and etoposide at Memorial Sloan Kettering, and a long abdominal surgery, and I lived. That treatment did exactly what it was supposed to do. I want to be clear about that, because none of what follows is a complaint about the medicine that saved me. The medicine worked. I am here because of it.
But platinum chemotherapy leaves a long shadow. The drugs that cure you in your teens are linked to a higher risk of other cancers and of heart disease decades later. Not the year after. Twenty, thirty years out, long after anyone is still watching.
That is the part almost no one is told.
Here is what should bother all of us. The formal follow-up for a testicular cancer survivor usually ends at five years. Five years clear and you are discharged, cured, sent back to your life. But the most serious late effects of the treatment do not arrive at five years. They arrive at fifteen, and twenty, and thirty. The science on this is neither new nor fringe. Some of it was built by the same doctors who treated me. The knowledge exists. It just stops at the exam room door.
I learned how true that was this spring.
When the kidney mass showed up, I did what you do. I got it imaged again. One cancer center read it one way: the gray zone, worth watching. Another center read the same scan and called it more than ninety percent likely to be cancer. Same images. Same kidney. Two different answers. If you have ever held two reports that did not agree, you know exactly how that feels. You are the one who has to decide which one to believe, and you never went to medical school.
The first plan was to watch it. Scan every few months and see what it did. I went along with that. It kept growing. From 1.4 to 1.7 to about 1.8 over the year. Small numbers, a few millimeters at a time, but always in the same direction.
In the middle of that watching, two things happened that taught me what advocacy actually costs.
Eight days before one of my appointments, a message came through the patient portal. It said the mass was not really significant, still mostly cystic, and that I could cancel the visit and just get another scan in a few months. I read it twice. Then I wrote back and quoted the other radiologist’s reading, the one that put it over 90%. The appointment stayed on the calendar.
I kept it. At that visit, I sat across from a specialist and asked the question that mattered most to me. I have a history of testicular cancer and platinum chemotherapy. Doesn’t that raise my risk for a second cancer? He did not think it did. He did not think platinum-based chemo was a significant risk factor for a second malignancy.
I had read the research. He had written the research in his own field. And I was sitting there being told the exact thing I had come in worried about was not a real concern.
That is the gap. That is the reason I am putting this on the page. The science is not the problem. The problem is that it does not reliably reach the person in the chair, so they have to carry it themselves. I had to be the one who knew my own risk. I had to be the one who pushed. I uploaded my own scans and asked for the opinion myself instead of waiting for the system to route me. I quoted one report back against the other. I asked the next question, and the next one, until the plan changed.
It is a real plan now. A biopsy first, because I have never had one, and a needle is the only thing that will finally settle what a year of imaging has been arguing about. Then ablation. They enter through the skin, guided by imaging, and destroy the mass with heat or cold. No open incision. That matters more for me than it would for most people, because my abdomen is already a map of old scars. A long incision from 1993. Two hernia repairs. A back surgery. Ablation goes around all of it. Then, a scan a few months later to confirm it worked.
So this is most likely my third cancer. The first one I beat. The second was a thyroid cancer last year, which I caught. This one I am going to treat before it gets a vote on how my story ends. My genetic testing came back negative for the known inherited cancer genes, so this is most likely not something I inherited. The most likely explanation is the treatment that saved my life thirty-three years ago. The cure is still being paid for. This is another installment.
If you are reading this because you just found your own mass, or because you are years past a cancer that everyone told you was finished, here are the things I wish someone had handed me.
A small kidney mass like mine, even if it turns out to be cancer, is very treatable when it is caught early. That holds for a lot of what gets caught late in survivors. Early is the whole game, and you can only be early if someone is still looking.
So be the one who keeps looking. You do not have to be loud. You do not have to fight anyone. You can ask what your treatment history means for the next twenty years. You can ask for the scan. You can ask for a second read when two readers disagree. You can write your own history down and carry it into every room, because you are the only person who sits in all of them. And you can find other people who have been through it, which is part of why I am writing this instead of keeping it to myself.
I am okay. I am treating this on my terms. I am going to keep telling the parts no one warned me about, because the warning is what helps.