Setting the record straight - part 2
I recommend to go through my previous post "Setting the record straight" before reading this one.
GNC, passing .... etc
One of the goals of the "gender nonconformity to one's sex based gendered stereotypes" movement was to enable trans people to change their gender expression to that which did not match socially acceptable stereotypes for their sex group.
People used to use this line "clothes have no gender". Particularly for trans people, it was and is a way to socially normalize that it was okay for an AMAB person to wear dresses, and an AFAB person to wear trousers.
But do you notice something here? the sex of the trans person is acknowledged in the language, which developed in a way to separate sex and gender. Sex not equal to gender identity forms the basis for the trans movement.
The implications are profound.
Trans people's sexuality
Back then, the people who gave trans people THE certificates, they made sure that the trans individual had a firm understanding that post transition they shouldn't be changing from straight to homosexual or from homosexual to straight labels, if the target of their attraction stayed consistent.
However, in general -
- gay men aren't attracted to trans women.
- lesbian women aren't attracted to trans men.
- straight men who are attracted to trans women, are not into men.
- straight women who are attracted to trans men, are not into women.
yet based on technicality of sex and sexual attraction labels, straight partners of trans people would be considered bi/homosexual, which does not do justice to the totality of the trans experience, and erodes the sexuality of the straight partners.
On the other hand, using labels based on gender identity also does not do justice to the totality of trans experience, like for example, no one should be forced to date trans people simply based on identity alone.