Image 1 — [4 July 1926] Jersey: Lady Houston recovers her civil rights, after temporary deprivation following the death of her husband on 14 April.
Image 2 — [4 July 1926] Jersey: Lady Houston recovers her civil rights, after temporary deprivation following the death of her husband on 14 April.

[4 July 1926] Jersey: Lady Houston recovers her civil rights, after temporary deprivation following the death of her husband on 14 April.

u/erinoco — 2 days ago

[3 July 1926] Women march in London, demanding votes for women at 21, as opposed to the current age of 30.

u/erinoco — 3 days ago

[3 July 1926] Dean Welldon of Durham rebukes the conduct of Labour MPs in the House of Commons (letter published 6th July).

u/erinoco — 3 days ago

[28 June 1926] 'Schoolboy's Death on Wimbledon Common' - inquest report

u/erinoco — 8 days ago

[26 June 1926] 'Canadian Cabinet in Danger' - the controversial end of the first Mackenzie King ministry.

u/erinoco — 10 days ago

[25th June 1926] Report on aftermath of the defeated Spanish coup attempt on 23rd June 1926

u/erinoco — 11 days ago

[25th June 1926] Senate rejects the McNary farm support Bill (report from The Times)

u/erinoco — 11 days ago

[25th June 1926] Radio listings from The Times: BBC programmes and foreign stations.

u/erinoco — 11 days ago

Your uncle has recently died; you are executor of his will.

You take a preliminary overview of his effects. Most of these are easily dealt with, but you find two very large locked chests. You can't find any keys which correspond to the locks.

Before you take further steps, you are visited by someone who describes himself as a close friend of your uncle. You have met this man a couple of times in your uncle's company, and your uncle has mentioned him in passing occasionally, but neither you or your relatives know anything more about him.

This man offers you £10,000 in cash (or your local equivalent) to take away the chests, as long as you make no effort to open them. When you ask him elaborate, he says: "If you do open the chests, I guarantee that you won't get that amount of money with what you find there. You will also end up with a load of hassle. You won't be able to sort this quickly." The man refuses to elaborate further, but says he must know within 24 hours.

Do you take the man's offer, or do you proceed to force open the chests by any means you can?

reddit.com
u/erinoco — 12 days ago

[21 June 1926] An inquest is held concerning the death of Edith Thompson, known professionally as Edith Drayson, an actress.

u/erinoco — 15 days ago

[21 June 1926] "An Extinct Giant Serpent" - Professor Graham Kerr expounds on the species, named Bothrodon pridii by him, to the Royal Society of Edinburgh (reported in The Times, 22nd June)

u/erinoco — 15 days ago

In this challenge, you will be transported to an alternate universe where an existing fictional detective is a real person.

You choose which detective's universe you enter; they must exist in any work of fiction which has been published or publicly released.

In this universe, you will have a first cousin of the same age and sex as you. This cousin is worth around USD 100 million at 2026 prices. You are currently in line to inherit this cousin's wealth; the cousin intends to pursue a romantic relationship which will almost certainly lead to a new will being made leaving you out.

Your challenge is to murder this cousin, and then to baffle the detective for a year and a day after the murder. Once you have conmitted the murder, someone will ask the fictional detective to investigate the circumstances surrounding your cousin, even if there is no evidence of an actual murder or foul play in public. If the fictional detective suspects you, but has no idea how you murdered your cousin, you win. But if the detective can accuse you openly of the murder and explain how you performed it, then you lose.

If you win, you are transported back to the present day, and you receive the cousin's wealth in your country's currency at current values. If you lose, you remain in the alternate universe and have to cope with either the criminal processes of that world or any other consequences that might arise.

If your fictional detective usually benefits from plot armour (lucky coincidences, for instance) the universe will give them some of the same treatment, so you will have to bear this in mind.

EDIT: you can select a lead time of anything up to a year before you commit the murder once you have arrived in the universe. If you don't do anything, you return unharmed to the present day.

reddit.com
u/erinoco — 17 days ago
▲ 91 r/ColdCaseUK+1 crossposts

It is now just over 43 years since Andrea Troupe was found dead in a park in South East London. No one has ever been charged with her murder.

Andrea Troupe was a 15-year old girl of Caribbean descent, born in 1967. She lived with her mother, Theresa,,and her sister Audrey. She also had an elder brother, Paul, who lived elsewhere at the time. She had a boyfriend of roughly the same age, Steven.

The family lived in Peckham, on Pencraig Way. Pencraig Way is on the Ledbury Estate, which was largely constructed in the 1960s. Ledbury is less well known than the North Peckham Estate to its west. North Peckham was (and still is, I suppose) a council estate with a very bad reputation in London for crime and anti-social behaviour; the composition of Ledbury was similar. Andrea attended Silverthorne School, a school on the northern side of Burgess Park, a large park created by post-war redevelopment. At the time, it separated the North Peckham Estate from other large council estates to the north.

Monday 2nd May 1983 was May Day Bank Holiday in the United Kingdom. Apparently, Andrea did not behave unusually during the day. Theresa did not allow her daughters to go out after dark. However, at some point late on the 2nd May or early on the 3rd May, Andrea left the family flat.

On the morning of 3rd May, a friend of Andrea's called for her. Her sister found the empty bedroom and assumed that Andrea had already gone to school. When Andrea did not return in the evening, the family began to worry.

Around a mile south of Pencraig Way, in central Peckham, lies a small park, Warwick Gardens. This park is a couple of streets to the west of Peckham's principal street, Rye Lane. Although the park itself is a post-war creation, the surrounding area is largely Victorian in composition.

Warwick Gardens is bounded to its south by four railway tracks. At that time, the tracks carried traffic between Victoria, Blackfriars/Holborn Viaduct, London Bridge and South London, Kent, Sussex. On the morning of the 3rd May, a passenger on a train into Victoria saw Andrea's body and notified the police once the train arrived at the terminus.

(I will declare a personal interest: at the very same time as the murder, I was a young child, living roughly 500 yards away from the place where the body was discovered. My siblings and myself would frequently play in Warwick Gardens, unaccompanied by our parents, but I am surprised to find that none of us recollected anything about the murder until we happened to come across the articles a couple of years ago.)

Andrea had been stabbed in the heart and neck twelve times. Andrea was also six months’ pregnant; no one in the family was aware of this. Andrea had marks on her fingers that strongly suggested she fought back.

The police sought to interview Andrea's boyfriend Steven. Initially, Steven's mother refused to let him be interviewed. The police did, however, eliminate him from their inquiries. No progress has been made since then. Paul, alongside other family members, have periodically made public appeals to the police and the public, but no further action has resulted. DNA was not collected at the time.

There is, however, the issue of Michael Smithyman. In 1990, Smithyman, a man with a previous criminal record, was arrested in Kent for the murder of Terence Gayle (a contract killing, for which he received £3,000 on presenting Gayle's severed hand as proof). Some days before this murder, Smithyman also murdered his girlfriend, April Sheridan. Smithyman drove Sheridan to a field in Kent, made her dig her own grave, and shot her. Notably, April was pregnant with Smithyman's child.

On arrest in 1991, Smithyman confessed to these murders. He also claimed responsibility for Andrea's murder. Smithyman also claimed to have witnessed the ignition of the New Cross fire - a deliberately-set house fire which killed 13 young black people. No-one has ever been charged for the fire.

The police chose not to pursue the additional allegations at the time. Smithyman, who later changed gender and is now known as Michelle, retracted these additional confessions on applying for parole in 2015.

One suggestion I will make with local knowledge. Andrea seems to have been found near the eastern entrance of Warwick Gardens. Across the street, a terrace of houses directly faces the site, and there was a pub a little further away at the time. Several houses to the north of the park overlook the site. I think it's quite likely that any struggle there would have risked attracting attention. The murder, in my view, took place elsewhere, with Andrea being placed in the park after death. But it's possible the Met has forensic evidence to the contrary.

Thames News report, 1983

Daily Mirror report, 2021

u/erinoco — 28 days ago

There is a facility underground in a remote area which has been built to capture samples from every living human being.

The samples consist of various items we discard: shed skin, hair and nail clippings, bodily fluids (including blood, semen and fecal matter) and any other items that can be captured. Swarms of nanobots capture these items and take them to larger robots capable of flight, who transfer the items to the facility. The items are preserved; meanwhile, a precise and complete record of the genome is compiled from the clipping. The bots are sophisticated enough to seek samples from specific humans to complete a genome, or reject samples for those whose genome is already captured. The entire facility is contained in a natural cave system which has not yet been discovered by humans. It is powered by geothermal means, with the other devices being powered by solar energy.

This entire project is the work of an alien race. On completion of the facility, they seized you. The aliens explained the project to you. They explained that they would have to leave the planet, but they would return when the facility sends them a signal that its work is complete. ETC is currently around 20 years. The aliens will be satisfied if they capture the profiles of more than 95% of living human beings over the time period.

In the mean time, they have decided to appoint you to be the caretaker of the facility. If certain trigger thresholds are met (say, humanity appears to have discovered the nanobots and is destroying them, or the facility is discovered) the main computer operating the facility will alert you, wherever you are in the world. You are then instructed to inform governments of the facility's purpose, and then warn them that any attempt to destroy the facility or stop the project will be met with retaliation by the aliens when they return. If you take part in any efforts, retaliation will embrace you personally. If you die, the aliens will also return as soon as they can to investigate.

When the aliens will return, they will remove the facility, including the samples and data, to their home planet. They refuse to say what they intend to do with them. But they do say they do not intend to visit Earth for at least a century after collection.

In return, you have been given an interface for interacting with the facility's master computer. This interface is in English. It is designed to allow no one but you to access it, using a variety of techniques, including analysis of your biological signature. You can access the samples and the database. You can also use the master computer to carry out experiments using the data, if you can structure and design potentially successful research.

In general, the aliens want you to be compensated by monetising their work.

Would you collaborate with the aliens, or look for a way of frustrating their work?

reddit.com
u/erinoco — 1 month ago

Avery famous celebrity, who has recently died, has been credibly accused of committing many heinous acts during his lifetime.

This is your problem because your parents were fans of the celebrity, and brought you up in their way of thinking.

Your given names directly reference the celebrity. Your parents, were members of his fan club; you joined it too.

You met this celebrity on more than one occasion, and you have signed photos as mementos of the occasions, alongside various memorabilia you and your parents acquired over the years. The celebrity was always pleasant and generous when he met you and your parents. All this was known to all your social circle before the allegations came to light. You are still personally fond of the work of this celebrity.

What do you do now? Do you change your name, get rid of anything connecting you to the celebrity, and pretend he never existed? Do you defend the work, but not the man? Or do you try and look for anything which might mitigate the crimes he has been accused of, which can never be fully proven now that he is dead?

reddit.com
u/erinoco — 1 month ago
▲ 135 r/compoface

Denied access to our home due to unexploded ordnance compoface

u/erinoco — 1 month ago