With "Kotyan Khan", "The Grand Dukes", "Edward Longshanks" we have seen the other side of a campaign, this was taken to the extreme with 3K, now what story would you like to see from an enemy side?
If I had to choose, I would go for Henry the Lion, taking advantage of the Saxons as a new civilization
Whenever you see a thin or darker rock, it means it's a dyke.
We already had a rework of a classic civilization with the Persians, 3K did the same with the Chinese, and finally, with the upcoming DLC, it seems they'll be changing Viking architecture.
So, what changes are you willing to accept? Architecture, unit changes, UU changes, etc.
I'm refining a strategy with the Kitan and other civilizations. I already know the website to find out how many villagers I need for each resource to maintain consistent villager and soldier production.
My question is, how many do I need to maintain farms and pastures?
I want to optimize this strategy
Over 10 years ago, I saw that life here was very difficult.
Does anyone know what life is like there today?
After reading and thinking about it, I honestly believe they're aiming for a grand Alexander the Great-style campaign. I don't mind it, actually; I like the idea of crossovers in the story. However, traveling across Europe as a mercenary does look interesting.
Personally, I would have preferred a campaign for Cnut with the Danes as an introduction, followed by a look at the chaos that ensued after his death, and then a jump to Harald.
Even so, it looks interesting.
That's how I feel checking SteamDB once a week and browsing through the game files.
I still remember when they confused 11/10 with 10/11 and the Georgians and Armenians were leaked a month early.
I have a friend who plays a lot with the Cumans, and well, they always censor the word "Cumans" because, you know... CUM ans 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I have had to find alternatives like Qmans, Cu mans, etc.
It is a parasitic cone on the side of the Osorno Volcano (Chile), it was basalt. On the other side, there was an area with argillic hydrothermal alteration.
I think it might be part of the cone's chimney, but I'm not sure.
I'm the blue
He leido mucho y creo que esta propuesta podría ayudar a miles de egresados sin pega, detener la maquina de imprimir titulos y otros tantos problemas.
Si, habría problemas en q los "mas ricos" tendrian acceso a estas instituciones porq su calidad sería superior, pero hoy no veo una solución que nos haga felices a todos.
Elegí 600 puntos en la PAES porq sería equivalente a un 4.0
Based on the time range between the years 380 and 1599 (mid-game range), propose a civilization or campaign that would undoubtedly generate controversy by dealing with a sensitive topic, a complicated civilization, or a controversial event.
What do you think of other campaign gameplay styles?
​
A "Risk" scenario like in Dracula 2, RPG-style scenarios like several in V&V, King of the Hill (Yodit 4), etc.
​
Sometimes it gets a bit boring when everything is a Battle & Destroy scenario or a fixed-force scenario.
​
But what do you think?
I wanted to create a scenario inspired by a Jurchen raid on Goryeo, Great Liao, and I wanted to use Cao Cao as the leader. The problem is his Chinese dialogue. Is it possible to disable it?
Many of us are convinced that the new Chronicles will be based on the Punic Wars, the war between the Romans, Carthaginians, and some other civilization to support it (perhaps the Celtiberians).
I wonder, what will happen to the current Romans? Will they recycle them to use as Romans, or will they create new Romans from the past?
If we read Professor Pieixoto's lectures, it sounds like the Gilead event was so severe that it destroyed what the United States is as we know it.
If Gilead falls, it's unlikely the USA will ever reunify. It wouldn't be surprising if entire regions became independent, and we ended up with several new countries.
If we use the series as a starting point, those fighting in Michigan are fighting for themselves and have no idea what Mayday is. Later in Season 6, Mark Tuello tells us that the USA has "few friends" left. It wouldn't be surprising if Hawaii sought independence and various rebel factions followed suit.
Do pop-ups update here? Because there's been a new update here. What could it be?
Llevar con suerte 1 mes y ya andar pidiendo gente para que te suceda es como mucho ¿no?, como si solo le interesase perpetuar a su sector en el poder.
We usually talk about proposed civilizations, campaigns for existing civilizations, and other topics.
But let's look at something different. Which civilizations do you think won't have a campaign in the medium term?
I think the Japanese, because there's almost nothing to create that isn't a mirror campaign like the old Pachacuti campaign.